On the Problems of Theoretical Understanding of the Term “Fake News”

 
PIIS207987840029664-9-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840029664-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Affiliation: MGIMO University
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The paper examines the history of the formation of the term “fake news”. The main problems that scientists faced when trying to explain this phenomenon are explored. Attempts are made to classify “fake news” based on the features inherent in this phenomenon. An attempt was also made to highlight the main features of “national” approaches to describing fakes (Russian, Chinese and Western approaches). Explanations are given why “national” schools developed in this way, and a brief description of each of them is given. With the help of an extensive historical description, an attempt is made to give our own definition of “political fake news”.

Keywordspost-truth, information operations, political manipulation, fake news, information war
Received10.07.2023
Publication date31.12.2023
Number of characters21890
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 26

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Van Ts., Van Yu., Khuan M. Regulirovanie fejkovykh novostej: opredelenie, vyyavlenie, protivodejstvie // Informatika. 2021. № 8. S. 263—277.

2. Garbuznyak A. Yu. Fenomen postpravdy: deval'vatsiya fakta v medijnom diskurse // Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2019. № 1. S. 184—192.

3. Manoilo A., Yevstafiev D. Information Wars and Psychological Operations as the Basis for New Generation Hybrid Wars // ISTORIYA. 2021. Vol. 12. Issue 6 (104). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840016037-9-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016037-9

4. Zyryanova M. O. Sposoby protivodejstviya rasprostraneniyu fejkovoj informatsii // Obschestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika. 2020. № 6. S. 80—83.

5. Kara-Murza S. G. Manipulyatsiya soznaniem. M.: Ehksmo, 2005.

6. Kurilkin A. V. Informatsionnye i kiberneticheskie operatsii kak instrument realizatsii vneshnej politiki: formy, metody, tekhnologii: diss. kand. polit. nauk: 23.00.04. M.: MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. 2021.

7. Manojlo A. V. Informatsionnye vojny i psikhologicheskie operatsii. Rukovodstvo k dejstviyu. M.: Goryachaya liniya, 2018.

8. Manojlo A. V. Tsepnye reaktsii kaskadnogo tipa v sovremennykh tekhnologiyakh virusnogo rasprostraneniya «fejkovykh novostej» // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. 2020. № 3. S. 75—107.

9. Manojlo A. V., Petrenko A. I., Rozhin B. A., Strigunov K. S. Fejki: anatomiya lzhi. M.: Goryachaya liniya, 2021.

10. Ponomarev N. F. Fejkovye novosti v kontekste postpravdy // E-Scio. 2019. № 6. C. 103—112.

11. Strigunov K. S., Manojlo A. V., Go F. Fejkovye novosti i tekhnologiya preventivnoj delegitimizatsii vyborov // Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast'. 2022. № 2. S. 98—109.

12. Chugrov S. V. Post-truth: transformatsiya politicheskoj real'nosti ili samorazrushenie liberal'noj demokratii? // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 2. S. 42—59.

13. Schul'ts Eh. Eh. Fejkovye novosti v sovremennykh kommunikatsionnykh protsessakh // Vestnik Rossijskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Gosudarstvennoe i munitsipal'noe upravlenie». 2022. T. 9. № 3. C. 262—273.

14. Cameron M., Pennycook G., Rand D. Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news // Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 2020. No. 5. P. 80—100.

15. Haan S. The Post-Truth First Amendment // Indiana Law Journal. 2018. No. 13. P. 56—68.

16. Hasen R. Deep Fakes, Bots, and Siloed Justices: American Election Law in a Post-Truth World // St. Louis University Law Journal. 2019. No. 4. P. 36—45.

17. Marco Colino S. Brexit, Post-Truth Politics and the Triumph of a Messy Vision of Democracy over Technocracy // The Chinese University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper. 2016. No. 7. P. 2—10.

18. Pennycook G., Cannon T., Rand D. G. Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2018. Vol. 147. No. 12. P. 1865—1880.

19. Tesich S. A Government of Lies // The Nation. 1992. No. 1. P. 12—14.

20. Tsipursky G., Votta F. Fighting Fake News and Post-Truth Politics with Behavioral Science: The Pro-Truth // Behavior and Social Issues. 2018. No. 27. P. 47—70.

21. Verstraete M., Bambauer D. E., Bambauer J. R. Identifying and Countering Fake News // Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper. 2017. No. 15. P. 152—156.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up