Integration in Muscovy: The Case of Ryazan Elite

 
PIIS207987840023147-0-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840023147-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Saint Petersburg State University
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The integration of previously independent political entities into a single political unit was one of the main challenges facing European Medieval and Early modern rulers. The case analyzed in this study is the Ryazan region located in the southern part of Eastern Europe, which was ultimately annexed by the expanding Muscovite state in 1521. The first part of the article covers the main historiographical approaches to the problem of regionalism in the history of Early Modern Russia. The second part is devoted to a discussion of the methodology and results of the prosopographical study of the Ryazan service elite in the end of the 15th — first third of the 17th century. This case is one of the clearest examples of “soft” (non-violent) integration since the annexation of the Grand Duchy of Ryazan was not accompanied by either property confiscation or forced resettlement. The Muscovite government consistently preserved the local social structure. The members of the local elite were often involved in carrying out administrative and military service in their native region. The Ryazan community was significantly transformed by the Oprichnina confiscations, but the old local elite families preserved their traditional position in the local community. The Ryazan elite had a relatively low social status in the Muscovite ruling class hierarchy. The Time of Troubles opened a new page in the history of the Ryazan elite. Ryazan service people securely settled in Moscow, which led to a deep transformation of their career strategies and lifestyles.

KeywordsGrand Duchy of Ryazan, Muscovy, gentry, integration, Time of Troubles, prosopography, Ryazan, modern state, elite, 16th century, 17th century
AcknowledgmentThis paper was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project No 22-18-00151 “The Changes in the Composition and Image of the Ruling Elite of the Russian State During the Turning Periods of Russian History in the 16—17th Centuries (Boyars rule, Oprichnina, Time of Troubles, Reigns of Alexey Mikhailovich, Fedor Alexeevich, the Regency of Princess Sophia)”.
Received23.08.2022
Publication date15.12.2022
Number of characters43043
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 107

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Azovtsev A. V. Ryazanskaya zemlya. Predislovie // Pistsovye knigi Ryazanskoj i Nizhegorodskoj zemli. M., 2018. S. 10—25.

2. Arakcheev V. A. Srednevekovyj Pskov: vlast', obschestvo, povsednevnaya zhizn' v XV—XVII vekakh. Pskov, 2004.

3. Belyakov A.V. Organizatsiya upravleniya v Moskovskom gosudarstve XV – nachala XVII v. na vnov' prisoedinennykh territoriyakh s preimuschestvenno nerusskim naseleniem // Drevnyaya Rus'. Voprosy medievistiki. № 3 (89). S. 64—80. DOI: 10.25986/IRI.2022.8.89.007

4. Bentsianov M. M. Deti boyarskie «Naugorodskie pomeschiki». Novgorodskaya sluzhilaya korporatsiya v kontse XV — seredine XVI v. // Novgorodskaya Rus': istoricheskoe prostranstvo i kul'turnoe nasledie. Ekaterinburg, 2000. S. 241—277.

5. Bentsianov M. M. «Knyaz'ya, boyare i deti boyarskie». Sistema sluzhebnykh otnoshenij v Moskovskom gosudarstve v XV—XVI vv. M., 2019.

6. Bentsianov M. M. Sluzhilye ehlity Moskovskogo gosudarstva. Formirovanie, status, integratsiya. XV—XVI vv. M., 2021.

7. Bentsianov M. M. Smolenskij «gorod»: problemy formirovaniya i sluzhby v XVI v. // Istoriya voennogo dela: issledovaniya i istochniki. 2015. S-4. C. 96—130.

8. Bernadskij V. N. Novgorod i Novgorodskaya zemlya v XV v. M.; L., 1961.

9. Boyarchenkov V. V. Istoriki-federalisty: Kontseptsii mestnoj istorii v russkoj mysli 20—70-kh gg. XIX v. SPb., 2005.

10. Boyarchenkov V. V. «Russkaya istoriya v samoj osnove svoej est'… istoriya oblastej»: provintsializm, narodnost' i kolonizatsiya v istoricheskom diskurse federalistov ehpokhi Velikikh reform // Regiony Rossijskoj imperii. Identichnost', reprezentatsiya, (na)znachenie. M., 2021. C. 30—51.

11. Voropanov V. Judicial and Legal Mechanisms of Adaptation and Integration of the Volga and Ural Regions into Russia in the 16th Century // ISTORIYA. 2019. Vol. 10. Is. 8 (82). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840006009-8-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840006009-8

12. Glaz'ev V. N. Struktura vlasti v gorodakh – krepostyakh «na Pole» v kontse XVI v. // Istoricheskie zapiski: Nauchnye trudy istoricheskogo fakul'teta VGU. 1997. Vyp. 2. S. 5—13.

13. Gorodilin S. V. «Rostovtsi, kotorye sluzhat velikomu knyazyu»: k voprosu o Rostove kak udel'nom tsentre velikogo knyazheniya Moskovskogo vtoroj poloviny XV v. // Soobscheniya Rostovskogo muzeya. Vyp. 25. Rostov, 2020. S. 14—41.

14. Deduk A. V. Moskovsko-ryazanskoe porubezh'e XIV — nachala XVI v.: metodika lokalizatsii : dis. … kand. ist. nauk. M., 2018. T. 1—2.

15. Zimin A. A. Feodal'naya znat' Tverskogo i Ryazanskogo velikikh knyazhestv i moskovskoe boyarstvo kontsa XV — pervoj treti XVI v. // Istoriya SSSR. 1973. № 3. S. 124—142.

16. Ilovajskij D. I. Istoriya Ryazanskogo knyazhestva. M., 1858.

17. Karpova M., Stepanova I. Toropets in the Territorial and Administrative System of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Moscow State at the End of the 15th — 16th Century // ISTORIYA. 2021. Vol. 12. Is. 9 (107). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840017016-6-1/ DOI: 10.18254/S207987840017016-6

18. Kashtanov S. M. Rol' posrednikov v vydache zhalovannykh gramot // Issledovaniya po istorii knyazheskikh kantselyarij srednevekovoj Rusi. M., 2014. S. 289—302.

19. Kirpichnikov I. A. Boyarstvo Velikogo knyazhestva Ryazanskogo v nachale XVI v. // Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. Politologiya. Sotsiologiya, 2020. № 4. S. 47—50.

20. Kirpichnikov I. A. Regionalizm v istorii Moskovskoj Rusi: problemy kontseptualizatsii // Prepodavatel' XXI v. 2022. № 3. Ch. 2. S. 272—285. DOI: 10.31862/2073-9613-2022-3-272-285

21. Kirpichnikov I. A. Ryazanskaya sluzhilaya ehlita v kontse XV — pervoj treti XVII veka: dis. ... kand. ist. nauk. M., 2021.

22. Kirpichnikov I. A. Ryazanskaya ehlita posle prisoedineniya knyazhestva k Moskve: problemy integratsii // Drevnyaya Rus'. Voprosy medievistiki. 2021. № 2 (84). S. 68—78. DOI: 10.25986/IRI.2021.84.2.006

23. Kobrin V. B. Vlast' i sobstvennost' v srednevekovoj Rossii (XV—XVI vv.). M., 1985.

24. Kollmann N. Sh. Soedinyonnye chest'yu. Gosudarstvo i obschestvo v Rossii rannego novogo vremeni. M., 2001.

25. Krom M. M. Mezh Rus'yu i Litvoj. Pogranichnye zemli v sisteme russko-litovskikh otnoshenij kontsa XV — pervoj treti XVI v. M., 2019.

26. Krom M. M. Mestnoe samosoznanie i tsentralizovannoe gosudarstvo: Smolensk v XVI v. // Die Geschichte Russlands im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert aus der Perspektive seiner Regionen. Wiesbaden, 2004. S. 128—136.

27. Krom M. M. Rozhdenie gosudarstva. M., 2018.

28. Kuz'min A. V. Na puti v Moskvu. Ocherki genealogii voenno-sluzhiloj znati Severo-Vostochnoj Rusi v XIII — seredine XV v. M., 2015. T. 1—2.

29. Kuz'min A. V. Rospisi potomkov ryazanskikh boyar v rodoslovnykh knigakh XVI—XVII vv. // Materialy i issledovaniya po ryazanskomu kraevedeniyu. Ryazan', 2002. T. 3. S. 48—59.

30. Kuchkin V. A. K kharakteristike ryazanskogo dogovora 1496 g. // Vostochnoevropejskij srednevekovyj gorod. Ryazan', 2012. S. 90—101.

31. Kozlyakov V. N. Rod dvoryan Lyapunovykh v XVI—XVII vekakh // Chetvertye Yakhontovskie chteniya. Ryazan', 2008. S. 368—378.

32. Lavrent'ev A. V. «Polash' Ivana Vasil'evicha Izmajlova»: Ital'yanskij mech i ego russkie vladel'tsy ehpokhi Smutnogo vremeni // Arkhiv russkoj istorii. M., 2007. Vyp. 8. S. 60—77.

33. Maslennikova N. N. Prisoedinenie Pskova k russkomu tsentralizovannomu gosudarstvu. L., 1955.

34. Mordovina S. P., Stanislavskij A. L. Sostav osobogo dvora Ivana IV v period «velikogo knyazheniya» Simeona Bekbulatovicha // Arkheograficheskij ezhegodnik za 1976 god. M., 1977. C. 153—193.

35. Nikitin A. O. Ryazantsy Smutnogo vremeni: litsa i sud'by // Smutnoe vremya i zemskie opolcheniya v nachale XVII veka. Ryazan', 2011. S. 163—182.

36. Pavlov A. P. Gosudarev dvor i politicheskaya bor'ba pri Borise Godunove (1584—1605 gg.). SPb., 1992.

37. Pavlov A. P. Pravyaschaya ehlita Russkogo gosudarstva vtoroj poloviny XVI — pervoj poloviny XVII vv. // Pravyaschaya ehlita Russkogo gosudarstva IX — nachala XVIII vv. SPb., 2006. S. 202—405.

38. Pashkova T. I. Mestnoe upravlenie v Russkom gosudarstve pervoj poloviny XVI v. Namestniki i volosteli. M., 2000.

39. Popov S. N. Tverskaya znat' na moskovskoj gosudarevoj sluzhbe v kontse KhV — pervoj polovine XVI v.: dis. ... kand. ist. nauk. SPb., 2006.

40. Rabinovich Ya. N. Brat'ya Korob'iny na sluzhbe Rossii (1603—1639). Saratov, 2014.

41. Smetanina S. I. Zemlevladenie Ryazanskogo kraya i oprichnaya zemel'naya politika: dis. … kand. ist. nauk. M., 1982.

42. Smetanina S. I. Ryazanskie feodaly i prisoedinenie Ryazanskogo knyazhestva k Russkomu gosudarstvu // Arkhiv russkoj istorii. M., 1995. Vyp. 6. S. 49—80.

43. Strel'nikov S. V. Zemlevladenie v Rostovskom krae v XIV — pervoj treti XVII veka. M.; SPb., 2009.

44. Tikhomirov M. N. Rossiya v XVI stoletii. M., 1962.

45. Usachyov A. S. Ryazanskij episkop Iona (1522—1547) i tserkovnaya ehlita v Rossii XVI v. // Drevnyaya Rus'. Voprosy medievistiki. 2022. № 2. S. 60—75. DOI: 10.25986/IRI.2022.88.2.006

46. Florya B. N. Dva puti formirovaniya obschegosudarstvennoj politicheskoj ehlity (na materiale, otnosyaschemsya k istorii Pol'shi XIV v. i Russkogo gosudarstva XV—XVI v.) // Drevnyaya Rus'. Voprosy medievistiki. 2011. № 4 (46). S. 5—12.

47. Florya B. N. Lektsii po russkoj istorii. M., 2021.

48. Florya B. N. O putyakh politicheskoj tsentralizatsii Russkogo gosudarstva (na primere Tverskoj zemli) // Obschestvo i gosudarstvo feodal'noj Rossii. M., 1975. S. 281—290.

49. Chechenkov P. V. Nizhegorodskij kraj v kontse XIV — tret'ej chetverti XVI v.: vnutrennee ustrojstvo i sistema upravleniya. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2004.

50. Chernikov S. V. K voprosu o «neukorenennnosti» moskovskogo sluzhilogo klassa. Izmeneniya v famil'nom sostave dvoryanstva v uezdakh Evropejskoj Rossii v XVII — nachale XVIII vv. // Cahiers du monde russe. 2020. Vol. 61. № 1-2. P. 7—62. DOI: 10.4000/monderusse.11903

51. Chernov S. Z. Volok Lamskij v XIV — pervoj polovine XVI v. Struktury zemlevladeniya i formirovanie voenno-sluzhiloj korporatsii. M., 1998.

52. Shvatchenko O. A. Svetskoe feodal'noe zemlevladenie Ryazanskogo uezda v 90-e gg. XVI — 20—30-e gg. XVII vv. // Problemy istorii SSSR. M., 1973. S. 348—365.

53. Shul'gin V. S. Yaroslavskoe knyazhestvo v sisteme Russkogo tsentralizovannogo gosudarstva v XV — pervoj polovine XVI v. // Nauchnye doklady vysshej shkoly. Istoricheskie nauki. 1958. № 4. S. 3—15.

54. Bogatyrev S. Localism and Integration of Muscovy // Russia Takes Shape: Patterns of Integration from the Middle Ages to the Present. Helsinki, 2004. P. 59—127.

55. Given J. Autonomy, Integration and Marginalization in the Construction of Medieval States: A Comparison of Gwynedd and Languedoc under Outside Rule // European Journal of Sociology. 1990. № 31 (2). P. 285—315. DOI:10.1017/S0003975600006081

56. Given J. State and Society in Medieval Europe: Gwynedd and Languedoc under Outside Rule. Ithaca, 1990.

57. Glete J. Local Elites and Complex Organisations. Interaction, Innovations and the Emergence of the Early Modern Fiscal-Military States [Paper to the conference “War and the Golden Age: the Netherlands in comparative perspective, c. 1550—1700”, Rijswijk, 19—21 December, 2005]. URL: https://www2.historia.su.se/personal/jan_glete/Glete-Local_Elites_Complex_Org.pdf (data obrascheniya: 01.07.2022).

58. Kleimola A. M. From Here in Obscurity: The Riazan’ Provincial Elite and the Moscovite State in the 16th–17th Centuries // Sosloviya i gosudarstvennaya vlast' v Rossii. XV — seredina XIX vv. M., 1994. Ch. 2. S. 287—301.

59. Kleimola A. M. Genealogy and Identity among the Riazan’ Elite // Moskovskaya Rus' (1359—1584): kul'tura i istoricheskoe samosoznanie. M., 1997. S. 284—300.

60. Kleimola A. M. Holding On in the “Stamped-Over District” — the Survival of a Political Elite: Riazan’ Landholders in the Sixteenth Century // Russian History. 1992. Vol. 19. № 1. P. 129—142.

61. Henneman J. B. James Given, State and Society in Medieval Europe: Gwynedd and Languedoc under Outside Rule // Speculum. 1992. Vol. 67. № 2 P. 416—418. DOI: 10.2307/2864408

62. Tilly C. Reflections on the History of European State-Making // The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, 1975. P. 3—83.

63. Wærdahl R. B. The Incorporation and Integration of the King’s Tributary Lands into the Norwegian Realm c. 1195—1397. Leiden, 2011.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up