Underground Man in Legal Position: Dostoevsky and Existential Philosophy

 
PIIS207987840021614-4-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840021614-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation:
Lobachevsky University
Privolzhsky Research Medical University
Address: Russian Federation, Nizhny Novgorod
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The text implements a peculiar approach to the well-known topic “Dostoevsky and existential philosophy”. The author introduces a metaphor, based on which, it seems possible to conceptually and laconically reconstruct the philosophical position of the Russian thinker and, at the same time, to explicate a number of paradigm features of existential ontology and epistemology. The main thing is in the appearance of another (perhaps not superfluous) dimension of understanding the human place in the world. “An underground man in a legal position” is the announced basic metaphor. It makes it possible to clarify the meaning of the idea of unconcealedness and concretizes the link of uniqueness and inconsistency, on which, characterizing a person, existentialism focuses on. A philosophical interpretation of the underground from the “Notes” of the same name written by F. M. Dostoevsky and, with reference to the novel «Demons», an interpretation of the vulgarized underground are given. The “method” of Dostoevsky, as far as it is generally correct to speak of such, is identified as existential dialectics.

Keywordsexistential philosophy, F. M. Dostoevsky, dialectic, “underground man in a legal position”, vulgarization of the underground
Received02.05.2022
Publication date29.07.2022
Number of characters27512
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 184

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gesse G. Magiya knigi: Ehsse o literature / per. s nem. G. Snezhinskoj. SPb.: Limbus Press, Izd-vo K. Tublina, 2010.

2. Dostoevskij F. M. Besy // Dostoevskij F. M. Sobr. soch.: v 15 t. T. 7. L.: Nauka, 1990.

3. Dostoevskij F. M. Zapiski iz podpol'ya // Dostoevskij F. M. Sobr. soch.: v 15 t. T. 4. L.: Nauka, 1989. S. 452—550.

4. Dostoevskij F. M. M. N. Katkovu. 8 (20) oktyabrya 1870 // Dostoevskij F. M. Sobr. soch.: v 15 t. T. 15. SPb.: Nauka, 1996. S. 463—465.

5. Laut R. Filosofiya Dostoevskogo v sistematicheskom izlozhenii / per. s nem. I. S. Andreevoj / pod red. A. V. Gulygi. M.: Respublika, 1996.

6. Nitsshe F. Tak govoril Zaratustra. Kniga dlya vsekh i ni dlya kogo / per. s nem. V. V. Rynkevicha. M.: Interbuk, 1991.

7. Rozanov V. V. Na lektsii o Dostoevskom // Opyty: Literaturno-filosofskij ezhegodnik. M.: Sovetskij pisatel', 1990. S. 316—323.

8. Seleznyov F. I. Dostoevskij. 5-e izd. M.: Molodaya gvardiya, 2007.

9. Suslova A. P. Gody blizosti s Dostoevskim: Dnevnik — povest' — pis'ma. Reprint. izd. M.: RUSSLIT, 1991.

10. Fatenkov A. N. «Besy» Dostoevskogo i podnogotnaya pandemii // Istoriya. Semiotika. Kul'tura: sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii, posvyaschennoj 200-letiyu Fyodora Mikhajlovicha Dostoevskogo i 150-letiyu Sergeya Nikolaevicha Bulgakova / otv. red. I. V. Demin. Samara: Samar. gumanit. akad., 2021. S. 144—150.

11. Fatenkov A. N. Nevozvraschenets: figura sub'ekta v negativnoj dialektike // Voprosy filosofii. 2013. № 6. S. 159—169.

12. Fatenkov A. N. Ehkzistentsial'naya ontognoseologiya: ot opyta k svidetel'stvu // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. № 6 (54). S. 7—18.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up