Logic and Cognitive Science

The paper examines the relationship between logic and cognitive science. We consider various aspects of this relationship, among which we distinguish three of the most importance, in our thought. First, it is the role of cognitive science in the justification of logic. Secondly, the mutual influence of cognitive science and modern trends of non-classical logic, which have a clearly applied character. Third, we discuss the prospects of the so-called experimental logic arising from attempts to apply the methods of cognitive science in logic. As usual, the conclusion summarizes the results of the research and focuses on the issue of the status of pure logic.

Keywords

logic, cognitive science, neuroscience, justification of logic, non-classical logics

Received

17.06.2021

Publication date

15.09.2021

Number of characters

42279

Cite

GOST	Zaitseva N., Zaitsev D. Logic and Cognitive Science // ISTORIYA – 2021. – V. 12. – Issue 8 (106) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://history.jes.su/S207987840016864-9-1 (circulation date: 19.05.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016864-9
MLA	Zaitseva, Natalia, Zaitsev, Dmitry "Logic and Cognitive Science." ISTORIYA 12.8 (106) (2021) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016864-9
APA	Zaitseva N., Zaitsev D. (2021). Logic and Cognitive Science. ISTORIYA 12(8 (106)) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016864-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 217

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bazhanov V. A. Abstragirovanie i abstraktsii v optike nejronauki // Epistemology & Philosophy of Science. 2021. T. 58. № 2.

2. Gusserl' Eh. Logicheskie issledovaniya. Mn.: Kharvest, 2000.

3. Gusserl' Eh. Logicheskie issledovaniya. T. 2. M.: DIK, 2001.

4. Zajtseva N. V. Znachenie kak ideal'nyj ob'ekt // Logicheskaya semantika: perspektivy dlya filosofii yazyka. M., 2011.

5. Zajtseva N. V. Kognitivnye osnovaniya semanticheskoj teorii Eh. Gusserlya (na materiale «Logicheskikh issledovanij») // Ya. (A. Slinin) i My: k 70-letiyu professora Yaroslava Anatol'evicha Slinina. SPb., 2002.

6. Zajtseva N. V. K kognitivno-fenomenologicheskoj traktovke rassuzhdenij // Ratsio.ru. 2016. № 1.

7. Zajtseva N. V. U istokov sovremennoj nauki o soznanii: Frege ili Gusserl'? // Ratsio.ru. 2015. № 15.

8. Smirnova E. D. Logika v filosofii i filosofiya logiki // Logicheskie issledovaniya. 2000. № 7.

9. Sovremennaya logika: osnovaniya, predmet i perspektivy razvitiya: Sb. nauch. trudov / pod red. D. V. Zajtseva. M.: Forum, 2018.

10. Aberdein A., Inglis M. (ed.). Advances in experimental philosophy of logic and mathematics. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019.

11. Beavers A. F. Phenomenology and artificial intelligence // Metaphilosophy. 2002. T. 33. № 1-2.

12. Bilokobylskyi O. “The hard problem” of consciousness in the light of phenomenology of artificial intelligence // Skhid. 2019. № 1 (159).

13. Benthem J. van. Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

14. Benthem J. van. Where is logic going, and should it? // Topoi. 2006. T. 25. № 1-2.

15. Cichy R. M., Kaiser D. Deep neural networks as scientific models // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2019. T. 23. № 4.

16. Dreyfus H. L., Hall H. Husserl, intentionality, and cognitive science. MIT Press, 1982.

17. Egré P., Politzer G. On the negation of indicative conditionals / eds. Franke M., Aloni M., Roelofsen F. Proceedings of the Amsterdam Colloquium, 2013.

18. Goel V. et al. The reasoning brain: The interplay between cognitive neuroscience and theories of reasoning // Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2017. T. 10.

19. Harman G. Internal Critique: A Logic is not a Theory of Reasoning and a Theory of Reasoning is not a Logic // Studies in logic and practical reasoning. Elsevier, 2002. T. 1.

20. Husserl E. Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik / ed. E. Holenstein. Haag: Nijhoff, 1975.

21. Ito T. et al. Discovering the computational relevance of brain network organization // Trends in cognitive sciences. 2020. T. 24. № 1.

22. Joaquin J. J. et al. Prospects for experimental philosophical logic // Organon F. 2019. T. 26. № 2.

23. Knobe J. Experimental philosophy is cognitive science // A companion to experimental philosophy. 2016.

24. Kriegeskorte N., Douglas P. K. Cognitive computational neuroscience // Nature neuroscience. 2018. T. 21. № 9.

25. Lemhoff R. Intuitionism in the Philosophy of Mathematics // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 Edition) / ed. Edward N. Zalta [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/intuitionism/ (data obrascheniya: 11.07.2021).

26. Magnani L. Naturalizing logic: Errors of reasoning vindicated: Logic reapproaches cognitive science // Journal of Applied Logic. 2015. T. 13. № 1.

27. Malinowski J., Palczewski R. Logic in cognitive science // Logic and Logical Philosophy. 2011. T. 20. № 1-2.

28. McIntyre R. Husserl and the representational theory of mind // Topoi. 1986. T. 5. № 2.

29. Pfeifer N., Douven I. Formal epistemology and the new paradigm psychology of reasoning // Review of Philosophy and Psychology. 2014. T. 5. № 2.

30. Pietarinen A. V. Logic, Neuroscience and Phenomenology in Cahoots? // WSPI. 2004.

31. Priest G. Revising logic // P. Rush (ed.). The metaphysics of logic. 2014.

32. Ragni M. et al. Two-valued logic is not sufficient to model human reasoning, but three-valued logic is: A formal analysis // Bridging@ IJCAI. 2016.

33. Ramírez D. A. J. G. Artificial Mathematical Intelligence: Cognitive, (Meta) mathematical, Physical and Philosophical Foundations. Springer Nature, 2020.

34. Ramos G. G. Human Rationality: Explanations from Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Logic // Tópicos. Revista de Filosofía. 2021. № 61.

35. Ripley D. Experimental philosophical logic // A companion to experimental philosophy. 2016.

36. Saldanha E. A. D. From Logic Programming to Human Reasoning: How to be Artificially Human // KI-Künstliche Intelligenz. 2018. T. 32. № 4.

37. Savage N. How AI and neuroscience drive each other forwards // Nature. 2019. T. 571. № 7766.

38. Schroyens W. Logic and/in psychology: The paradoxes of material implication and psychologism in the cognitive science of human reasoning // Cognition and conditionals: Probability and logic in human thinking. 2010.

39. Schurz G. Non-monotonic reasoning from an evolution-theoretic perspective: Ontic, logical and cognitive foundations // Syntheses. 2005. T. 146. № 1.

40. Sedlár I., Šefránek J. Logic and cognitive science // Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science IV. 2014.

41. Smith J. C. (ed.). Historical foundations of cognitive science. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012. T. 46.

42. Stenning K., Van Lambalgen M. Human reasoning and cognitive science. MIT Press, 2012.

43. van Benthem J. Logical dynamics of information and interaction. Cambridge University Press, 2011.

44. van Benthem J. Where is logic going, and should it? // Topoi. 2006. T. 25. № 1-2.

45. Wilson R. A., Keil F. C. (ed.). The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences. MIT press, 2001.

46. Woleński J. Logic in the light of cognitive science // Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric. 2016. T. 48. № 1.