The History of the Transformation of Internet Activism in Belarus (on the Example of Political Protests of 2020—2021)

The article examines the problem of political participation in the digital environment on the example of protest activity observing in Belarus. It is shown that modern Internet technologies make it easy to combine new forms of civic activism with offline practices through social media and Telegram channels. It is argued that social networks and Internet activism in general indirectly form the political agenda and are significant factors in the creation of public reflection on political processes. New forms of civil interaction have appeared in digital reality, which were impossible without online technologies, and before the surge of protest activity in the post-Soviet space were considered insignificant quasi-political participation of the minority. Whole communicative autonomous systems created in social networks and messenger applications allow political activity bypassing traditional rules and frameworks, which, according to the author, is nothing more than a qualitative transformation and complication of political participation, both structurally and in scale. The Belarusian format of the protest showed that in the current conditions the success of a political campaign may not be due to clear coordination and competent management emanating from the core of protest. Analyzing political cases, it is concluded that modern protest practices, decentralized formed in the network, in an offline manifestation are very mobile and do not require significant expenditure of forces and resources. In conclusion, the author concludes that political participation in Belarus, conditioned by Internet resources and advanced technologies, from 2020 to 2021 acquired the features of a conventional active opposition political movement, although historically, political absenteeism prevailed in the country's civil society. Thus, the events in Belarus under consideration are unique and are a sign of more global modern transformations of politics.

Keywords

civic Internet activism, social networks, new forms of political participation, information society, civic activism, online protest

Acknowledgment

The study was carried out with financial support from the Faculty of Political Science of the Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov as a result of the scientific project “Technologies and factors of expansion of the protest Internet activism in Russia”.

Received

04.06.2021

Publication date

19.07.2021

Number of characters

23255

Cite

GOST	Kozlov E. The History of the Transformation of Internet Activism in Belarus (on the Example of Political Protests of 2020—2021) // ISTORIYA – 2021. – V. 12. – Issue 6 (104) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://history.jes.su/S207987840016255-9-1 (circulation date: 26.07.2024). DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016255-9
MLA	Kozlov, Evgeny "The History of the Transformation of Internet Activism in Belarus (on the Example of Political Protests of 2020—2021)." ISTORIYA 12.6 (104) (2021) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016255-9
APA	Kozlov E. (2021). The History of the Transformation of Internet Activism in Belarus (on the Example of Political Protests of 2020—2021). ISTORIYA 12(6 (104)) DOI: 10.18254/S207987840016255-9

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 334

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aleksandrovskaya B. IT-protest: kak tekhnologii pomogayut belorusam protivostoyat' Lukashenko // DeutscheWelle, 23.11.2020 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.dw.com/ru/it-protest-kak-tehnologii-pomogajut-belorusam-protivostojat-lukashenko/a-55700780 (data obrascheniya: 01.07.2021).

2. Artamonova Yu. D., Volodenkov S. V. Informatsionnye kapsuly kak strukturnyj komponent sovremennoj politicheskoj internet-kommunikatsii // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Politologiya. 2020. № 53.

3. Akhremenko A. S., Stukal D. K., Petrov A. P. Set' ili tekst? Faktory rasprostraneniya protesta v sotsial'nykh media: teoriya i analiz dannykh // Polis. 2020. № 2.

4. Bauman Z. Tekuchaya sovremennost' / per. s angl. pod red. Yu. V. Asochakova. SPb.: Piter, 2008.

5. Brodovskaya E. V., Pyrma R. V., Dombrovskaya A. Yu. Grazhdanskij aktivizm molodezhi Rossii: struktura rolej, faktory formirovaniya ustanovok, triggery rosta protestnogo potentsiala // Gumanitarnye nauki. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta. 2020. T. 10. № 6.

6. Bronnikov I. A. Samoorganizatsiya grazhdan v ehpokhu tsifrovykh kommunikatsij // Kontury global'nykh transformatsij: politika, ehkonomika, pravo. 2020. T. 13. № 2.

7. Bubnov A. Yu., Savel'eva M. A. Pamyat' o Velikoj Otechestvennoj vojne v Belarusi kak prostranstvo memorial'nykh vojn (na primere analiza onlajn-diskussii) // Voprosy politologii. 2021. T. 11. № 3 (67).

8. Voskanyan A. G., Pochta Yu. M. Znachimost' kommunikatsionnykh sredstv Interneta v sovremennoj politike // Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Politologiya. 2013. № 3.

9. Granovetter M. Sila slabykh svyazej // Ehkonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. 2009. № 4.

10. IATs opublikoval rejtingi SMI: internet dogonyaet TV // Belorusskij partizan. 2019 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://belaruspartisan.by/politic/454216/ (data obrascheniya: 02.07.2021).

11. Issledovanie: 61 % schitaet polozhenie v ehkonomike Belarusi plokhim // Evroradio. Sotsium. 2020 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://euroradio.fm/ru/issledovanie-61-schitaet-polozhenie-v-ekonomike-belarusi-plohim (data obrascheniya: 01.07.2021).

12. Lukashenko prokommentiroval sobytiya posle vyborov v Belarusi // RIA Novosti. 2021 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://ria.ru/20210702/lukashenko-1739569601.html (data obrascheniya: 02.07.2021).

13. Mart'yanov D. S. i dr. Struktura i diskurs virtual'noj ehlity 2.0 v Rossii // Kollektivnoe monograf. issl. / pod red. Mart'yanova. SPb.: EhlekSis, 2017.

14. Sukhotskij N. Shtrikhi k portretu «tsifrovogo pokoleniya»: belorusskaya molodezh' obraztsa 2020 goda // Belorusskij institut strategicheskikh issledovanij. 2020 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://bisr.gov.by/mneniya/shtrikhi-k-portretu-cifrovogo-pokoleniya-belorusskaya-molodezh-obrazca-2020-goda (data obrascheniya: 21.06.2021).

15. Ehkspert zayavil o ser'eznom informatsionnom iskazhenii v Belarusi // RIA Novosti, 30.10.2020 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://ria.ru/20201030/informatsiya-1582285874.html (data obrascheniya: 26.06.2021).

16. Izdebski K. Wolna Białoruś, wolny internet. O ulicznym oporze w epoce cyfrowej // Klub Jagiellonski, 2021 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://klubjagiellonski.pl/2021/01/07/wolna-bialorus-wolny-internet-o-ulicznym-oporze-w-epoce-cyfrowej/ (data obrascheniya: 27.06.2021).

17. Micheletti M., Stolle D. The Market as an Arena for Transnational Politics // Youth Activism. 2006 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://ya.ssrc.org/transnational/Micheletti_Stolle/ (data obrascheniya: 26.05.2021).

18. Morozov E. The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World. L.: Allen Lane; Penguin. 2012.

19. Pilkington H., Pollock G. Politics Are Bollocks: Youth, Politics and Activism in Contemporary Europe // The Sociological Review. 2015. Vol. 63. I. 2.

20. Rainie L., Smith A., Schlozman KL., Brady H., Verba S. Social Media and Political Engagement // Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. 2012 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://www.pewinternet.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/9/media/Files/Reports/2012/PIP_SocialMediaAndPoliticalEngagement_PDF.pdf (data obrascheniya: 01.07.2021).

21. Raport I. Białoruś 2021: perspektywa zmiany // Universytet Warszawa. 2021 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: https://studium.uw.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/BWR_Raport_1.pdf (data obrascheniya: 01.07.2021).

22. Stromer-Galley J. Measuring deliberation’s content: a coding scheme // Journal of Public Deliberation, 2007. Vol. 3. I.1 (12).

23. Theocharis Y. The Conceptualization of Digitally Networked Participation // Social Media + Society. 2015. Vol. 1. I. 2.

24. Van Deth J. W. A Conceptual Map of Political Participation // Acta Politica. 2014. Vol. 49.