Price publication: 0
Number of purchasers: 0, views: 391
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. OECD 2015. How’s Life?: Measuring Well-being. P.: OECD Publishing, 2015.
2. Stiglitz J., Fitoussi J.-P., Durand M. Beyond GDP: Measuring What Counts for Economic and Social Performance. P.: OECD Publishing, 2018.
3. Sachs J. The Age of Sustainable Development. N. Y.: Columbia University Press, 2015.
4. Transformation of Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Final Document of the UN Summit, adopted on September 25, 2015 [Electronical source]. URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org
5. Bobylev S. N., Solovieva S. V. Sustainable Development Goals for the Future of Russia // Problems of Forecasting. 2017. N 3 [Electronical source]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article
6. Bobylev S. and Grigoryev L. In search of the contours of the post-COVID Sustainable Development Goals: The case of BRICS // BRICS Journal of Economics. 2020. № 2 (1). 4-24 [Electronical source]. URL: https://doi.org/10.38050/2712-7508-2020-7
7. Purvis B., Yong M. and Robinson D. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science. 2018. № 14 (3). P. 681—695.
8. Boström M. SSPP: A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainable Science Practice Policy. 2012. 8: 3—16 [Electronical source]. URL: http://search.proquest.com/openview
9. Boyer R., Peterson N., Arora P., Caldwell K. Five approaches to social sustainability and an integrated way forward. Sustainability. 2016 [Electronical source]. URL: https://www.mdpi.com
10. Eizenberg E., Jabareen Y. Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework. Sustainability. 9: 68—85. 2017 [Electronical source]. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010068
11. Berkes F., Folke C. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. N. Y.: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
12. Ostrom E. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(39): 15181—15187. 2007 [Electronical source]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104
13. Partelow S. A review of the social-ecological systems framework: applications, methods, modifications, and challenges. Ecology and Society 23 (4): 36. 2018 [Electronical source]. URL: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES- 10594-230436
14. Schlüter M., Orach K., Lindkvist E. and Martin. R. Toward a methodology for explaining and theorizing about social-ecological phenomena. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 39: 44—53. August: 2019 [Electronical source]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.011
15. Giddings B., Hopwood B. & O’Brien G. Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 2002. 10: 187—196.
16. Fisher J. and Rucki K. Re-conceptualizing the Science of Sustainability: A Dynamical Systems Approach to Understanding the Nexus of Conflict, Development and the Environment. Sustainable development, 2017. 25: 267—275.
17. TWI2050 — the World in 2050. 2018. Transformations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
18. TWI2050 — The World in 2050. 2019. The Digital Revolution and Sustainable Development: Opportunities and Challenges. Laxenburg: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
19. WBGU — German Advisory Council on Global Change. 2019. Towards our Common Digital Future. Summary. Berlin: WBGU.
20. Sachs J., Schmidt-Traub G., Kroll C., Lafortune G. and Fuller G. Sustainable Development Report 2019. N. Y.: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2019.
21. Islam N. and Iversen K. From “Structural Change” to “Transformative Change”: Rationale and Implications. DESA Working Paper. No. 155. 2018 [Electronical source]. URL: https://un.org/development/desa/publications/working-paper/wp155
22. Transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies in Asia and in the Pacific. 2018. United Nations, Asian Development Bank, United Nations Development Program [Electronical source]. URL: http://sdgasiapacific.net/download/SDG_Resilience_Report.pdf
23. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation // SPb.: Aletheia, 2002.
24. Parsons T. On social systems. M.: Academic Project, 2002.
25. Giddens E. Organization of society. Essay on the theory of structuration. M.: Academic Project, 2003.
26. Luhmann N. Social systems. SPb.: Science, 2007.
27. Martynov A. On the ideology of future world progress // Society and Economy. 2018. № 11. P. 5—24 [Electronical source]. URL: https://oie.jes.su
28. Gallopin G. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change, 2006. 16: 293—303.
29. Global Sustainable Development Report. 2019. United Nations [Electronical source]. URL: https://unstats.un.org>sdgs>The- Sustainable- Development
30. Körner K., Schattenberg M. and Heymann E. Digital economics. How AI and robotics are changing our work and our lives. Frankfurt am Main. Deutsche Bank Research. 2018 [Electronical source]. URL: http://dbresearch.com/.../Digital_economics%3A_How
31. Korinek A., Stiglitz J. E. Artificial Intelligence, Worker-Replacing Technological Change, and Income Distribution. NBER working paper 24174. 2017 [Electronical source]. URL: www.nber.org/papers/w24174
32. Acemoglu D., Restrepo, P. Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work. NBER Working Paper No. 24196. 2018 [Electronical source]. URL: http:// www.nber.org/papers/w24196
33. Greening with jobs. 2018. World employment and social outlook. Geneva: ILO [Electronical source]. URL: https://ilo.org/weso-greening/documents/WESO_Greening_EN_web2.pdf
34. The Inclusive Growth and Development Report. 2017. Geneva: World Economic Forum [Electronical source]. URL: http://www3 .weforum. org/docs/WEF_Forum_IncGrwth_2017.pdf
35. Sustainable Business Transformation Barometer. Effie Russia. 2019 [Electronical source]. URL: https://home.kpmg/ru/ru/home/insights/2019/10/barometer
36. OECD 2019. Measuring Distance to the SDG Targets 2019: An Assessment of Where OECD Countries Stand, OECD Publishing. Paris [Electronical source]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/a8caf3fa-en
37. The UN Sustainable Development Goals and Russia: a report on human development in the Russian Federation. Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation, 2016 [Electronical source]. URL: http://ac.gov.ru/files/publication/a/11068.pdf
38. Voluntary National Review of the Implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Analytical Center for the Government of the Russian Federation, 2020.
39. Global economic prospects. June 2020. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2020. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1553-9.
40. Global economic prospects. June 2019: Heightened Tensions, Subdued Investment. Washington, DC: World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1398-6.
41. Martynov A. V. The future of economies with emerging markets // International Economics, 2020. No. 9. P. 27—34. DOI: 10.33920/vve-04-2009-05.
42. McKinsey Global Institute. 2018. Outperformers: High-growth emerging economies and the companies that propel them [Electronical source]. URL: http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi.
43. The Global Competiveness Report 2019. 2019. Geneva, Switzerland. World Economic Forum [Electronical source]. URL: https://www.weforum.org/gcr
44. Mazarr M. (2018). Summary of the Building a Sustainable International Order Project. RAND Corporation [Electronical source]. URL: https://rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2397.html
45. Anvari V., Ehlers N., Steinbach R. A semi-structural approach to estimate South Africa’s potential output, South African Reserve Bank. 2014.
46. Shackleton R. Estimating and projecting potential output using CBO’s forecasting growth model. Working paper 2018-3. 2018 [Electronical source]. URL: http://www.cbo.gov/publication/53558
47. Global economic prospects. January 2018: Broad-Based Upturn, but for How Long? Washington, DC: World Bank. DOI:10.1596/978-1-4648-1163-0.
48. Andersson M., Szörfi, B., Tóth, M. andZorellN. Potential output in the post-crisis period. ECB. Economic Bulletin, 7:49—70. 2018 [Electronical source]. URL: http://www.ecb.europa.eu>pub >html>eb201807.en.html
49. Alberola E., Estrada A. and Santabárbara D. Growth and imbalances in Spain: a reassessment of the output gap. Journal of Spanish economic association. 2014.5 (2-3). P. 333—356. DOI: 10.1007/s 13209-014-0112-z
50. Berger H., Dowling T., Lunan S., Mrkair M., Rabanal D., Sanjani T. Steady as she goes: estimating potential output during financial “Booms and Busts”. IMF. Working Paper 15/233. 2015 [Electronical source]. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfwpa/15-233.html
51. Coibion O., Gorodnichenko Y. and Ulate M. “The Cyclical Sensitivity in Estimates of Potential Output”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, 2018. Vol. 49 (2 (Fall)). P. 343—441.
52. Vo D., Nguyen T., Tran N. and Vo A. What Factors Affect Income Inequality and Economic Growth in Middle-Income Countries? Journal of Risk and Financial Management. № 12 (1). 2019 [Electronical source]. URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12010040
53. Cingano F. Trends in Income Inequality and its Impact on Economic Growth. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers. No. 163. OECD Publishing. 2014 [Electronical source]. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxrjncwxv6j-en
54. Dabla-Norris E., Kochhar K., Ricka F., Suphaphiphat N. and Tsounta E. Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global Perspective. International Monetary Fund. 2015 [Electronical source]. URL: https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfsdn/15-13.html
55. Bernardo G. and D’Alessandro S. 2016. System-dynamic analysis of employment and inequality impacts of low-carbon investment in Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions. DOI: 10.1016/j. eist .2016.04.006
56. Taylor L., Foley D. and Rezai A. An Integrated Approach to Climate Change, Income Distribution, Employment, and Economic Growth. Ecological economics, 2016. 121(C): 196—205.
57. Hardt L. and O'NeillD. Ecological Macroeconomic Models: Assessing Current Developments. Ecological Economics. 2017. 134. P. 198—211 [Electronical source]. URL: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolecon
58. Congress Budget Office. 2019. An Update to the Budget and Economic Outlook: 2019 to 2029. [Electronical source]. URL: http:// www.cbo.gov/publication/55551
59. David H., Gatti D. 2018. Agent-based macroeconomics. Bielefeld working papers in Economics and Management. 2. DOI: 10.4119/unibi/2916999
60. Dosi G., RoventiniA. More is Different ... and Complex! The Case for Agent-Based Macroeconomics. LEM. Working paper series, 2019/01. 2019 [Electronical source]. URL: lemwps/2019-01.html
61. Hodgson G. Conceptualizing Capitalism: Institutions, Evolution, Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.