Once Again on the Date of the Foundation of the Archbishopric of Novgorod

 
PIIS207987840013647-0-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840013647-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: State Academic University for the Humanities
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

Most of scholars believe that the first bishop of Novgorod to obtain the title of archbishop was Nifont (1131—1156). Aleksei Gippius recently has shown that we have no grounds not to trust the Novgorodian annals calling Nifont’s predecessors also archbishops. Gippius supposes that the Novgorodian see was archiepiscopal from its very foundation in the late 10th century, as it is presented by later Novgorodian chroniclers. However, it seems significant that the earliest extant Rus chronicle, the Synodal manuscript of the First Novgorodian Chronicle calls Feodor bishop s.a. 1069, and calls him archbishop s.a. 1077, both entries most probably going back to contemporary records. In the absence of any other contemporary evidence, it seems probable that Feodor was the first Novgorodian archbishop, and he obtained this title at some moment between 1069 and 1077. The author suggests some ideas concerning the possible circumstances of that event.

KeywordsOld Rus, source studies, history of the church, Novgorodian archbishopric, Novgorodian chronicles, Bishop Feodor of Novgorod
Received13.09.2020
Publication date31.01.2021
Number of characters21299
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 313

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Artamonov Yu. A. K istorii stroitel'stva Uspenskogo sobora Kievo-Pecherskoj lavry // Velika Uspens'ka tserkva Kiєvo-Pechers'koї lavri. Slid u vikakh: Materiali mizhnar. nauk. konf., 1—2 zhovtnya 2001 r. Kiїv, 2002. S. 20—32.

2. Artamonov Yu. A. Vremya i obstoyatel'stva vozniknoveniya pervoj russkoj arkhimandritii // Drevnyaya Rus': Voprosy medievistiki. 2017. № 4 (70). S. 120—129.

3. Gimon T. V. Novgorodskoe letopisanie pervoj chetverti XIII v.: khronologiya i protsess popolneniya letopisi // Srednevekovaya Rus'. M., 2006. Vyp. 6. S. 80—118.

4. Gimon T. V. Redaktirovanie letopisej v XIII—XV vv.: Raznochteniya mezhdu spiskami Novgorodskoj 1 letopisi // Trudy Otdela drevnerusskoj literatury Instituta russkoj literatury (Pushkinskij dom). SPb., 2006. T. 57. S. 112—125.

5. Gimon T. V. Sobytiya XI — nachala XII v. v novgorodskikh letopisyakh i perechnyakh // Drevnejshie gosudarstva Vostochnoj Evropy, 2010 g.: Predposylki i puti obrazovaniya Drevnerusskogo gosudarstva. M., 2012. S. 584—703.

6. Gimon T. V. Yan' Vyshatich i ustnye istochniki drevnerusskoj Nachal'noj letopisi // Drevnejshie gosudarstva Vostochnoj Evropy, 2011 g.: Ustnaya traditsiya v pis'mennom tekste. M., 2013. S. 65—117.

7. Gimon T. V. Rubezh XII—XIII vv. v novgorodskom letopisanii // Slověne: International Journal of Slavic Studies. 2017. T. 6. № 2. S. 163—187 [Ehlektronnyj resurs]. URL: http://slovene.ru/2017_2_Guimon.pdf

8. Gippius A. A. K istorii slozheniya teksta Novgorodskoj pervoj letopisi // Novgorodskij istoricheskij sbornik. SPb., 1997. Vyp. 6 (16). S. 3—72.

9. Gippius A. A. Novgorodskaya vladychnaya letopis' XII—XIV vv. i ee avtory (Istoriya i struktura teksta v lingvisticheskom osveschenii). I // Lingvisticheskoe istochnikovedenie i istoriya russkogo yazyka, 2004—2005. M., 2006. S. 114—251.

10. Gippius A. A. K voprosu o vremeni uchrezhdeniya Novgorodskoj arkhiepiskopii // Kompleksnyj podkhod v izuchenii Drevnej Rusi: Mat-ly X Mezhdunar. konf. 9—13 sentyabrya 2019 g. Moskva, Rossiya. M., 2019. S. 57—59.

11. Nazarenko A. V. Drevnyaya Rus' na mezhdunarodnykh putyakh: Mezhdistsiplinarnye ocherki kul'turnykh, torgovykh, politicheskikh svyazej IX—XII vv. M., 2001.

12. Nazarenko A. V. Drevnyaya Rus' i slavyane (istoriko-filologicheskie issledovaniya). M., 2009. (Drevnejshie gosudarstva Vostochnoj Evropy, 2007 g.).

13. Nazarenko A. V. Arkhiepiskopy v Russkoj tserkvi domongol'skogo vremeni // Drevnyaya Rus': Voprosy medievistiki. 2015. № 4 (62). S. 67—76.

14. Pechnikov M. V. «A se novgorodskyi episkopy»: Spornye voprosy rannej tserkovnoj istorii Novgoroda (konets X — 70-e gg. XI v.) // Vestnik tserkovnoj istorii. 2015. № 3/4 (39/40). S. 207—274.

15. Pechnikov M. V. Novgorodskaya episkopiya v kontse XI — 1 j treti XII v.: Pecherskie postrizheniki na Severe Rusi i nachalo ehpokhi politicheskikh preobrazovanij // Vestnik tserkovnoj istorii. 2016. № 3/4 (43/44). S. 165—213.

16. Pechnikov M. V. Novgorodskij svyatitel' Nifont, knyazheskaya vlast' i Kievskaya mitropoliya (30—50-e gg. XII v.) // Vestnik tserkovnoj istorii. 2017. № 3/4. S. 237—278.

17. Stolyarova L. V. Svod zapisej pistsov, khudozhnikov i perepletchikov drevnerusskikh pergamennykh kodeksov XI—XIV vv. M., 2000.

18. Khalyavin N. V. Problema stanovleniya novgorodskoj arkhiepiskopii v trudakh otechestvennykh istorikov // Vestn. Udmurtskogo un-ta. Ser. Istoriya i filologiya. 2016. T. 26. Vyp. 4. S. 23—30.

19. Schapov Ya. N. Gosudarstvo i tserkov' Drevnej Rusi X—XIII vv. M., 1989.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up