American Historiography on German Big Business Activities in the Period of the Dawes Plan, 1924—1929

 
PIIS207987840006787-4-1
DOI10.18254/S207987840006787-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Zhukovsky – Gagarin Air Force Academy
Address: Russian Federation, Voronezh
Journal nameISTORIYA
Edition
Abstract

The article analyses the views of American historians on the activities of German big business around the Dawes Plan. The author focuses on American historiography on the impact of foreign loans on social conflicts in the Weimar Republic. This study aims to enrich discussion on the effectiveness of the Versailles-Washington system of international relations with new data and concepts. American historians cited compelling evidence of the fragility of Germany’s economic, social, and political stabilization achieved in 1924—1929. In the end, the Entente countries could not provide the conditions for the creation of a the “social world”, proclaimed in the Treaty of Versailles.

KeywordsAmerican historiography, American studies of Germany, the Weimar Republic, German big business, capitalist stabilization, “crisis before the crisis”, American investment, Dawes Plan, Young Plan
Received29.03.2019
Publication date16.09.2019
Number of characters50100
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 791

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Allenov S. G. K voprosu o vliyanii Versal'skogo diktata na plany nemetskogo revansha posle okonchaniya Pervoj mirovoj vojny // Itogi i posledstviya Pervoj mirovoj vojny: vzglyad cherez stoletie. Sbornik statej Vserossijskoj nauchno-teoreticheskoj konferentsii (g. Voronezh, 16—17 maya 2018 g.) / otv. red. A. A. Bogdashkin. Voronezh, 2018.

2. Bogdashkin A. A. Amerikanskaya istoriografiya vtoroj poloviny 40-kh — 80-kh gg. KhKh v. o roli germanskogo bol'shogo biznesa v politicheskoj istorii Vejmarskoj respubliki. M., 2012.

3. Bonnel Eh. D. Germanskie ehlity i zakhvat vlasti natsistami v 1933 g. // Bereginya. 777. Sova. 2014. № 4(23).

4. Versal'skij mirnyj dogovor. M., 1925.

5. Kukushkina I. A. Germaniya: sotsial'no-ehkonomicheskie i politicheskie posledstviya Pervoj mirovoj vojny // Itogi i posledstviya Pervoj mirovoj vojny: vzglyad cherez stoletie. Sbornik statej Vserossijskoj nauchno-teoreticheskoj konferentsii (g. Voronezh, 16—17 maya 2018 g.) / otv. red. A. A. Bogdashkin. Voronezh, 2018.

6. Kul'bakin V. D. Militarizatsiya Germaniya v 1928—1930 gg. M., 1954.

7. Postnikov V. V. SShA i dauehsizatsiya Germanii. M., 1957.

8. Romanov V. V. Kompromissy Parizhskoj mirnoj konferentsii i ikh posledstviya dlya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij v mezhvoennyj period // Evropejskie sravnitel'no-istoricheskie issledovaniya. Vyp. 5. Parizhskaya mirnaya konferentsiya, 1919—1920: Vzglyad iz XXI v. M., 2017.

9. Sergeev E. Yu. Versal'sko-Vashingtonskaya sistema mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij // Vsemirnaya istoriya. T. 6. Mir v XX v.: ehpokha global'nykh transformatsij. Kn. 1. M., 2017.

10. Yaz'kov E. F. Istoriya stran Evropy i Ameriki v novejshee vremya (1918—1945). M., 1998.

11. Abraham D. The Collapse of the Weimar Republic: Political Economy and Crisis. Second Edition. N. Y., 1986.

12. Baranowski S. The Collapse of the Weimar Parliamentary System // A Companion to Nazi Germany / eds. by S. Baranowski, A. Nolzen, C.-C. W. Szejnmann. Chichester, 2018.

13. Berghahn V. R. American Big Business in Britain and Germany: A Comparative History of Two “Special Relationships” in the 20th Century. Princeton, 2014.

14. Berghahn V. R. Hitler’s Buddies // The New York Times. August 2, 1987.

15. Boemeke M. F., Feldman G. D., Glasser E. Introduction // The Treaty of Versailles: A Reassessment after 75 Yeas / eds. by M. F. Boemeke, G. D. Feldman and E. Glasser. Cambridge, 1998.

16. Borchardt K. Krise und Rekonstruktion. Zur Interpretation der gesamtwirtschaftlichen im 20. Jahrhundert // Deutsche Wirtschaftsgeschichte im Industriezeitalter / hrsg. von W. Abelsbauser, D. Petzina. Königstein/Ts., 1981.

17. Childers T. Interest and Ideology: Anti-System Politics in the Era of Stabilization 1924—1928 // Die Nachwirkungen der Inflation auf die deutsche Geschichte, 1924—1933 / hrsg. von G. D. Feldman und E. Müller-Luckner. (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs., Kolloquien 6). München, 1985.

18. Childers T. The Nazi Voter: The Social Foundations of Fascism in Germany, 1919—1933. Chapel Hill, 1983.

19. Costigliola F. The United States and the Reconstruction of Germany in the 1920s // The Business History Review. 1976. Vol. 50. No. 4.

20. Dorpalen A. Hindenburg and Weimar Republic. Princeton, 1964.

21. Feldman G. D. Paul Reusch and the Politics of German Heavy Industry 1908—1933 // People and Communities in the Western World. Vol. II / ed. by G. A. Brucker. Homewood—Illinois, 1979.

22. Feldman G. D. The Historian and the German Inflation // Inflation Through the Ages: Economic, Social, Psychological and Historical Aspects / eds. by N. Schmukler and E. Marcus. N. Y., 1983.

23. Feldman G. D. The Large Firm in the German Industrial System: The M.A.N. 1900—1925 // Industrielle Gesellschaft und Politisches System. Beiträge zur Politischen Sozialgeschichte. Festschrift für Fritz Fischer / hrsg. vom D. Stegmann, B.-J. Wendt, P.-H. Witt. Düsseldorf, 1978.

24. Feldman G. D. The Social and Economic Policies of German Big Business, 1918—1929 // The American Historical Review. 1969. Vol. 75. No. 1.

25. Feldman G. D. The Weimar Republic: A Problem of Modernization? // Archiv für Sozialgeschichte. 1986. Bd. 26.

26. Feldman G. D. Weimar from Inflation to Depression: Experiment or Gamble? // Die Nachwirkungen der Inflation auf die deutsche Geschichte, 1924—1933 / hrsg. von G. D. Feldman und E. Müller-Luckner. (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs., Kolloquien 6). München, 1985.

27. Hallgarten G. W. F. Comments on Mr. Landauer’s Latter // The Journal of Economic History. 1954. Vol. XIV. No. 1.

28. Halperin S. W. Germany Tried Democracy: A Political History of the Reich from 1918 to 1933. N. Y., 1946.

29. Industrielles System und politische Entwicklung in der Weimarer Republik. Verhandlungen des Internationalen Symposiums in Bochum vom 12.—17. Juni 1973 / hrsg. von H. Mommsen, D. Petzina, B. Weisbrod. Düsseldorf, 1974.

30. Jacobson J. Is There a New International History of the 1920s? // The American Historical Review. 1983. Vol. 88. No. 3.

31. Jones L. E. German Liberalism and the Dissolution of the Weimar Party System, 1918—1933. Chapel Hill; L., 1988.

32. Jones L. E. In the Shadow of Stabilization: German Liberalism and the Legitimacy Crisis of the Weimar Party System, 1924—1930 // Die Nachwirkungen der Inflation auf die deutsche Geschichte, 1924—1933 / hrsg. von G. D. Feldman und E. Müller-Luckner. (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs., Kolloquien 6). München, 1985.

33. Landauer C. European Socialism: A History of Ideas and Movement from the Industrial Revolution to Hitler’s Seizure of Power. Berkeley, 1959. Vol. II.

34. Landauer C. Heavy Industry and Union Labor in the Weimar Republic // The Journal of Economic History. 1954. Vol. XIV. No. 1.

35. Maier Ch. S. Recasting Bourgeois Europe: Stabilization in France, Germany and Italy in the Decade after World War I. Princeton, 1975.

36. Maier Ch. S. The Vulnerabilities of Interwar Germany // The Journal of Modern History. 1984. Vol. 56. No. 1.

37. McNeil W. C. American Money and the Weimar Republic: Economics on the Eve of the Great Depression. N. Y., 1986.

38. Peterson L. Labor and the End of Weimar: The Case of the KPD in the November 1928 Lockout in the Rhenish-Westphalian Iron and Steel Industry // Central European History. 1982. Vol. 15. No. 1.

39. Schuker S. A. American “Reparations” to Germany, 1919—1933 // Die Nachwirkungen der Inflation auf die deutsche Geschichte, 1924—1933 / hrsg. von G. D. Feldman und E. Müller-Luckner. (Schriften des Historischen Kollegs., Kolloquien 6). München, 1985.

40. Schuker S. A. American “Reparations” in Germany, 1919—1933. (Princeton Studies in International Finance. No. 61). Princeton, 1988.

41. Turner Jr. H. A. The Ruhrlade, Secret Cabinet of Heavy Industry in the Weimar Republic // Central European History. 1970. Vol. 3. No. 3.

42. Why Weimar Fell // The New York Times. September 13, 1987.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up