All
 
|
 
 


Protection of the rights and interests of the parties in recovery from the developer for the breach of the terms of transfer of the object of sharing construction to the shareholder
 
PIIS102694520028716-8-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520028716-8
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Anna V. Pushkina 
Occupation: Senior researcher, Procedural Law Sector, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 11
Pages64-71
Abstract

The article describes a variety of approaches to determining the amount of a penalty for violation of the terms of transfer of an object of shared construction that exist in practice. It is noted that the lack of uniformity in the methodology for calculating the size of such a penalty reduces legal certainty and, as a result, trust in the judicial system. It is proposed to adhere to a literal interpretation of the law when setting the date on which the size of the key rate of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation should be determined for calculating such penalties, namely, to proceed from the day of signing the act of acceptance and transfer of the shared construction object. The use of a different size of the discount rate often leads to infringement of the rights of equity holders, and the penalty ceases to be a tool to protect the weak party in the relationship of equity participation in construction. If the amount of the penalty with this method of calculation turns out to be clearly disproportionate to the consequences of the violation, to restore the balance of interests of the parties, you can use the mechanism for reducing the penalty on the basis of Art. 333 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, taking into account the peculiarities of each specific situation.

Keywordscontract for participation in shared construction, legal forfeit, penalty forfeit, protection of consumer rights, overcompensatory protection, improper performance of an obligation, non-performance of an obligation, judicial discretion
Received15.02.2023
Publication date04.12.2023
Number of characters30577
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 83

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Galuzo V.N. “The right to housing” in the Russian Federation: myth or reality? // Legal adviser in construction. 2020. No. 6. P. 28–34 (in Russ.).
2. Karapetov A.G. Penalty as a means of protecting the creditor's rights in Russian and foreign law. M., 2005 (in Russ.).
3. Krasnova S.A. Overcompensation protection in Russian civil law: forms and limits // Herald of Economic Justice of the Russian Federation. 2020. No. 1. P. 68 - 110 (in Russ.).
4. Kuznetsov A.P. Trends in the legal development of shared-equity construction // Legal issues of real estate. 2017. No. 2. P. 19 - 23 (in Russ.).
5. Lebed K.A. Court decision in the system of Civil Procedural Law // State and Law. 2022. No. 12. P. 166. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520023311-3 (in Russ.).
6. Mikhailova E.V. Settlement of disputes in the system of protection of civil rights // Notary Bulletin. 2021. No. 6. P. 35. DOI: 10.53578/1819-6624_2021_6_28 (in Russ.).
7. Mikhailova E.V., Chucha S. Yu., Letova N.V., Solovyanenko N.I. Judicial and non-judicial protection of civil, family and labor rights in the conditions of globalization and digitalization of the state and society // State and Law. 2022. No. 9. P. 67. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520022201-2 (in Russ.).
8. Mozhilyan S.A. Practical issues of reducing the size of the penalty for violation of the terms of transfer of shared-equity construction objects // Legal issues of real estate. 2021. No. 1. P. 17 - 20 (in Russ.).
9. Petrukhin M.V. Term and responsibility for its violation in the contract of participation in shared construction // Comment of judicial practice / res. ed. K.B. Yaroshenko. M., 2018. Issue. 23. P. 48 - 55 (in Russ.).
10. Plastinina N. Deceived shareholders still remain empty-handed? // Housing Law. 2018. No. 1. P. 97 - 112 (in Russ.).
11. Svirin Yu. A. The legality of reducing the penalty by the court // Modern Law. 2018. No. 12. P. 74 - 78 (in Russ.).
12. Slesarev V.L., Kravets V.D. Penalty as an “overcompensation” sanction and features of its application in cases involving consumers // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2022. No. 3. P. 59 - 64 (in Russ.).
13. Trapeznikov V.A. Statutory liability in shares of the refinancing rate: problems of law enforcement practice and ways to solve them // Legislation and Economics. 2013. No. 6 (in Russ.).
14. Khlebnikov P. Consequences of violation of the terms of construction // Housing Law. 2020. No. 1. P. 5 - 14 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up