V.S. Nersesyants as a philosopher of law: from Soviet to Post-Soviet

 
PIIS102694520027731-5-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520027731-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Director of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Editor-in-Chief of the Journal “State and Law”
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Occupation: Head of the Department of Philosophy of Law, History and Theory of State and Law of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 9
Pages7-18
Abstract

The article analyzes the philosophical and legal ideas and ideas of the famous scientist, thinker, jurist of the last quarter of the XX - beginning of the XXI century, Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences V.S. Nersesyants. The ideas of ancient philosophers and representatives of the German transcendental-idealistic philosophy had a great influence on the formation and evolution of his legal views, the concept of jurisprudence formulated by him. In this regard, the comparison of his legal views with the ideas of Hegel’s Philosophy of Law, taking into account both dissertations of V.S. Nersesyants, is quite traditional for connoisseurs of the concept of jurisprudence of our contemporary. However, as the experience of a more detailed and in-depth analysis shows, interesting points of similarity of his legal ideas and the nature of their justification are also connected with other representatives of the German intellectual and philosophical culture of discussing the main problems of law and jurisprudence. Understanding the nature of successive and new aspects in the system of legal views of V.S. Nersesyants can serve as a basis for the development of his legal views in modern topical and prospective studies. The article offers some significant clarifications of the content and nature of the philosophical and legal heritage of V.S. Nersesyants, traces the connections of his concept of jurisprudence with the ideas of not only Hegelian philosophy, but also the teachings of other legal philosophers, as well as the later ideas of the neo-Kantian lawyer R. Stammler, the interpretation of law in the “Pure Doctrine of Law” of the Kantian G. Memel, and not only G. Kelsen, which allows us to present the theory of law of V.S. Nersesyants as an original version of this doctrine. The study also demonstrates that the concept of justice in the Philosophy of Law of V.S. Nersesyants has remained one of the unexplained, and promising studies of the foundations of social theory in the doctrine of civilization are also indicated.

KeywordsV.S. Nersesyants, Philosophy of Law, concept of jurisprudence, law and the law, formal equality, freedom, justice, German idealism, type of legal understanding, civilization, pure doctrine of law, dialectic of legal form
Received07.09.2023
Publication date29.09.2023
Number of characters35418
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 139

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alekseev S.S. Theory of law: search for new approaches. Yekaterinburg, 2000. P. 25 (in Russ.).

2. Bochkarev S.A. Theoretical and methodological research of criminal law as a system of scientific knowledge: dis. ... Doctor of Law. M., 2020 (in Russ.).

3. Gorban V.S. Iering’s legal doctrine and its interpretations. M., 2018 (in Russ.).

4. Gorban V.S., Gruzdev V.S. On the diversity of “pure” doctrines of law // Law and Politics. 2022. No. 11. P. 32 - 43 (in Russ.).

5. Gruzdev V.S. Realism in jurisprudence: theoretical, methodological and historical aspects. M.; Saratov, 2021 (in Russ.).

6. Ilyin I.A. The general doctrine of law and the state. M., 2006 (in Russ.).

7. Our difficult path to law: materials of philosophical and legal readings in memory of Academician V.S. Nersesyants / comp. V.G. Grafsky. M., 2006 (in Russ.).

8. Nersesyants V.S. Speech at the “Round Table” of the journal “Soviet State and Law” on the topic “On the understanding of Soviet law” // Soviet State and the Law. 1979. No. 7. P. 30–34 (in Russ.).

9. Nersesyants V.S. Hegelian Philosophy of Law: history and modernity. M., 1974 (in Russ.).

10. Nersesyants V.S. History of Political and legal doctrines. M., 2009 (in Russ.).

11. Nersesyants V.S. Marx’s critique of the Hegelian Philosophy of Law: abstract ... PhD in Law. M., 1965 (in Russ.).

12. Nersesyants V. Moods. Poems of different years. M., 1996. P. 107 (in Russ.).

13. Nersesyants V.S. The national idea of Russia in the world-historical progress of equality, freedom and justice. Manifesto about Civilization. M., 2001 (in Russ.).

14. Nersesyants V.S. Our way to law: from Socialism to civilization. M., 1992. P. 3, 5 (in Russ.).

15. Nersesyants V.S. General theory of law and state. M., 2010. P. 8 (in Russ.).

16. Nersesyants V.S. Platon. M., 1984 (in Russ.).

17. Nersesyants V.S. Hegel’s political and legal theory and its interpretations: abstract … Doctor of Law. M., 1975 (in Russ.).

18. Nersesyants V.S. Political teachings of Ancient Greece. M., 1979 (in Russ.).

19. Nersesyants V.S. Law and the law. From the history of political and legal doctrines. M., 1983. P. 350 (in Russ.).

20. Nersesyants V.S. Law - mathematics of freedom. M., 1996 (in Russ.).

21. Nersesyants V.S. Law: diversity of definitions and unity of the concept // Soviet State and Law. 1983. No. 10. P. 26–35 (in Russ.).

22. Nersesyants V.S. The problem of the common good in post-socialist Russia // Russian Justice. 2006. No. 4. P. 4–13 (in Russ.).

23. Nersesyants V.S. Socrates. M., 1977 (in Russ.).

24. Nersesyants V.S. Philosophy of Law. 2nd ed., reprint and add. M., 2009. P. 44, 45, 435 (in Russ.).

25. Nersesyants V.S. Hegel’s Philosophy of Law. M., 1998 (in Russ.).

26. Nersesyants V.S. Philosophy of Law: libertarian legal concept // Questions of Philosophy. 2002. No. 3. P. 3–15 (in Russ.).

27. Novgorodtsev P.I. Kant and Hegel in their teachings on law and the State: two typical constructions in the field of Philosophy of Law. M., 1901 (in Russ.).

28. Peretersky I.S. Digests of Justinian: essays on the history of compilation and general characteristics. M., 1956 (in Russ.).

29. Pligin V.N. The problem of legitimacy in modern political and legal doctrines: dis. ... Doctor of Law. M., 2022 (in Russ.).

30. Political teachings: history and modernity. Pre-Marxist political thought / Grafsky V.G., Graziansky P.S., Deev N.N. et al.; editors: P.S. Graziansky, V.E. Guliyev (ed.), V.S. Nersesyants. M., 1976 (in Russ.).

31. Political teachings: History and modernity. Marxism and Political Thought of the XIX century / Grafsky V.G., Graziansky P.S., Guliyev V.E. et al.; editors: P.S. Graziansky, V.E. Guliyev (ed.), V.S. Nersesyants. M., 1979 (in Russ.).

32. Savenkov A.A. On the role of crises in the development of the problem of legality // Savenkov A.A. Problems of Legality in Western and Russian Legal Thought of the XIX - XXI centuries. M., 2022. P. 123 (in Russ.).

33. Savenkov A.N. State and Law: Human rights and the World order based on the Rule of Law: in 3 vols. M., 2021 (in Russ.).

34. Savenkov A.N. Philosophy of Law and global the crisis of modernity. SPb., 2019 (in Russ.).

35. Spectorsky E. The problem of social physics in the XVII century. SPb., 2006. P. 385 (in Russ.).

36. Shershenevich G.F. History of Philosophy of Law. SPb., 2001 (in Russ.).

37. Jahresberichte für Deutsche Geschichte. Neue Folge 26./27. Jahrgang 1974/1975. Mit Nachträgen. Herausgegeben von der Akademie der Wissenschaften der DDR Zentralinstitut für Geschichte Abteilung Information und Dokumentation. Akademie.Verlag. Berlin, 1977. S. 324.

38. Mehmel G.E.A. Die reine Rechtslehre. Erlangen, 1815. S. 47.

39. Stammler R. Lehrbuch der Rechtsphilosophie. Berlin [u.a.], 1922. S. 3, 4, сноски.

40. Stammler R. Wesen des Rechtes und der Rechtswissenschaft // Systematische Rechtswissenschaft / von R. Stammler, R. Sohm, K. Gareis [u. a.]. Berlin; Leipzig, 1906. S. I–LX.

41. Systematische Rechtswissenschaft / von R. Stammler, R. Sohm, K. Gareis [u. a.]. Berlin; Leipzig, 1906. S. 507.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up