Machine-reading and machine-execution law: essential, linguistic and mental aspects

 
PIIS102694520027227-0-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520027227-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head of the Center for the Implementation and Operation
Affiliation: Integrated Information System of the Russian Bar of the Federal Chamber of Lawyers
Address: Russian Federation,
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 8
Pages74-83
Abstract

In the article machine readability and machine executability of law can be considered as an imperative of digital transformation in the legal field. In the field of machine reading and machine execution of law, there are many subjects for discussion that are within the limits of purely utilitarian issues related exclusively to the field of information technology and focusing on issues of information systems, programming languages, technologies and tools for machine reading and machine execution and etc., and those that reach the level of problems of a mental, ontological, semiotic, hermeneutic and other nature. The author indicated terms that are significant for the problem under study are indicated and their definitions are given. Some issues related to the essential, linguistic and mental aspects of ensuring machine-readable and machine-executable law are highlighted.

Keywordsdigital transformation, digitalization, machine readability of law, machine-executability of law, machine-readable technologies
Received24.01.2022
Publication date11.09.2023
Number of characters35750
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 150

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Vashkevich A.M. Automation of law: law as electricity. M., 2019. P. 34–36 (in Russ.).

2. Gavrilov S.N. Russian legal mentality: procedural law vs people’s justice of customary law // Lex russica. 2021. Vol. 74. No. 10. P. 100–112 (in Russ.).

3. Golovanova E.I. Cognitive terminology: problems, tools, directions and prospects of development // Herald of the Chelyabinsk State University. 2013. No. 24 (315). Philosophy. Art history. Issue 82. P. 14 (in Russ.).

4. Zakhartsev S.I., Salnikov V.P. On integrative legal understanding in the context of a comprehensive theory of law // Legal science: history and modernity. 2017. No. 2. P. 42 (in Russ.).

5. Karsavin L.P. About personality. URL: https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=176812&p=40 (accessed: 28.12.2022) (in Russ.).

6. Kolesov V.V. “Life comes from the word ...”. SPb., 1999. P. 124, 125, 191–193 (in Russ.).

7. Kolesov V.V. Fundamentals of conceptology. SPb., 2019. P. 620–623 (in Russ.).

8. Kolesov V.V. Russian mentality in language and text. SPb., 2006. P. 13, 284, 393, 398, 413 (in Russ.).

9. Kolesov V.V., Kolesova D.V., Kharitonov A.A. Dictionary of Russian mentality: in 2 vols. SPb., 2014. Vol. 2 (P - Ya). P. 535 (in Russ.).

10. Lazarev V.V. Integrative perception of law // Lazarev V.V. Favorites of the last decade. M., 2020. P. 96 (in Russ.).

11. Lotman Yu. M. Three functions of the text // Lotman Yu. M. Inside thinking worlds. M., 1996. P. 11 - 22 (in Russ.).

12. Ponkin I.V. The concept of machine-readable and machine-executable law: relevance, purpose, place in PerText, content, ontology and prospects // International journal of open information technologies. 2020. Vol. 8. No. 10. P. 65 (in Russ.).

13. Taranova E.N. Problematics of modern theoretical terminology, achievements and shortcomings of terminological research // Scientific Bulletin of the Belgorod State University. Ser.: Humanities. 2011. No. 24 (119). Issue. 12. P. 148 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up