All
 
|
 
 


Legal security and legal certainty of the individual: constitutional and legal aspect
 
PIIS102694520026151-7-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520026151-7
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Dzhamilya Veliyeva 
Occupation: Head of the Department of Constitutional and International Law of Stolypin Volga Institute of Management (Branch) of the of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Affiliation: Stolypin Volga Region Institute of Management (Branch) of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Address: Russian Federation, Saratov
Mikhail V. Presnyakov
Occupation: Professor of the Department of Service and Labor Law of Stolypin Volga Institute of Management (Branch) of the of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Affiliation: Stolypin Volga Region Institute of Management (Branch) of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Address: Russian Federation, Saratov
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 6
Pages24-35
Abstract

In this article doctrinal approaches to the concept of legal safety are analyzed. In domestic jurisprudence legal safety, as a rule, is considered, first, as safety is right (a legal system, positive law) and, secondly, as legal security (security the right) from the most various threats.

Meanwhile, in the first case the subject approach to a problem is almost completely ignored, and legal safety is presented in the form of set of certain requirements to quality of the law. In the second - the concept of legal safety excessively extends as practically all spheres of public life are to a degree covered by legal regulation. From this point of view the subnotion of legal safety gets, for example, ensuring labor protection or criminal protection of interests of society and the person.

At the same time both approaches don’t consider “a human factor”: the person in this case is considered only as subject to protection. In this regard legal safety is considered as “part” or “component” of national security. At the same time, there is also an alternative point of view which was developed mainly in the foreign doctrine. According to her legal safety is considered as security of the personality from legal risks. From this point of view legal safety assumes lack of retroactive effect of the law, maintenance of legitimate trust, etc. In this sense legal safety approaches a concept of legal definiteness.

On the basis of the analysis of the scientific points of view and legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation the authors come to a conclusion that legal safety represents the requirement of the actual or material legal definiteness. The fundamental principle of such material definiteness - maintenance of trust to the law and actions of public authorities that assumes not only formal aspect of lack of retroactive effect of the law, but also verification of the positive legislation of the rights which are rather affirmed by the constitution and freedoms of the person and citizen.

Keywordssafety, legal safety, legal risks, legal definiteness, lawful expectations, trust to the law
Received02.08.2022
Publication date30.06.2023
Number of characters38391
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 453

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Aryamov A.A. General theory of risk (legal, economic and psychological analysis). M., 2009. P. 24, 25 (in Russ.).
2. Bershitsky E.E. Legal certainty and evaluation categories: a brief essay on the example of the composition of offenses in various branches of law. M., 2021 (in Russ.).
3. Gadzhiev G.A. Constitutional principles of market economy. M., 2002. P. 82 (in Russ.).
4. Galuzin A.F. Legal security in the system of legal policy // Issues of Economics and Law. 2011. No. 1. P. 347 (in Russ.).
5. Grineva A.V. Legal risks and their minimization: questions of theory // Bulletin of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow Region. 2019. No. 1. P. 77 - 87 (in Russ.).
6. Gritsenko A.A. Theoretical and methodological approaches to the definition of the concept of security // Herald of NSU. Ser.: Philosophy. 2008. No. 3. P. 88 (in Russ.).
7. Dreyshev B.V. Legal security and problems of its provision // Jurisprudence. 1998. No. 2. P. 11 - 19 (in Russ.).
8. Ershov V.V. Paired categories “certainty of law” and “uncertainty of law” // Certainty and uncertainty of law as paired categories: problems of theory and practice: materials of the XII International Scientific and Practical Conference: in 3 parts. M., 2018. Part I. P. 28 (in Russ.).
9. Ivashchenko G.V. On the concept of “security”. URL: https://portalus.ru/modules/philosophy/rus_readme.php?subaction=showfull&id=1108062853&archive=0215&start_from=&ucat=  & (accessed: 11.03.2021) (in Russ.).
10. Kalamkaryan R.A., Krotkova N.V. Legal human security in Russia. Threats and challenges in the field of jurisprudence (Based on the materials of the Scientific and Practical Conference) // Law and Politics. 2002. No. 1. P. 111 - 125 (in Russ.).
11. Kartashov V.N. Risks in law or in the legal system of society? // Legal technology. 2019. No. 13. P. 175 - 179 (in Russ.).
12. Lapaev I.S. Category “legal security” in the conceptual apparatus of Russian and foreign legal science // Modern Law. 2012. No. 2. P. 7 - 11 (in Russ.).
13. Mamonov V.V. Legal security of the Russian Federation // Law and State: Theory and Practice. 2005. No. 2. P. 4 (in Russ.).
14. Maslovskaya T.S. On the concept of legal security and its use in foreign countries // Improving the quality of legislation as a means of legal security: materials of the International “Round Table”, November 16, 2018, Minsk, Belarus / ed. by G.A. Vasilevich, T.S. Maslovskaya. Minsk, 2019. P. 65 - 70 (in Russ.).
15. Mathieu Bertran. Predictability of legal regulation is a constitutional imperative // Improving the quality of legislation as a means of legal security: materials of the International “Round Table”, November 16, 2018, Minsk, Belarus / ed. by G.A. Vasilevich, T.S. Maslovskaya. Minsk, 2019. P. 71, 73 (in Russ.).
16. Mathieu B., Maslovskaya T.S. Problems of the principle of legal security // Journal of the Belarusian State University. Law. 2019. No. 3. P. 3–8 (in Russ.).
17. Pilipenko A.N. The principle of legal security in French law // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2013. No. 4 (41). P. 647 (in Russ.).
18. Pshidatok M.R. The concept of personal security in social knowledge // Humanities, socio-economic and social sciences. 2011. No. 1. P. 42 (in Russ.).
19. Sokolova S.N., Sokolova A.A. Security phenomenology: problems and prospects // Herald of the Polessky State University. A series of social sciences and humanities. 2012. No. 2. P. 62, 63 (in Russ.).
20. Tiedemann P. The principle of Rechtsstaat in Germany // Doctrines of the rule of law and the Rule of Law in the modern world: collection of articles / res. eds: V.D. Zorkin, P.D. Barenboim. M., 2013. P. 279 (in Russ.).
21. Tolkachenko A.A., Ter-Akopov A.A. Legal human security in the Russian Federation // Law and Security. 2006. No. 1, 2 (in Russ.).
22. Tonkov D.E. American legal realism: legal certainty from the position of normosceptics // Jurisprudence. 2015. No. 4 (321). P. 144 (in Russ.).
23. Fasmer M. Etymological dictionary of the Russian language: in 4 vols / transl. from it.=Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch; transl. and additional by O.N. Trubachev. 4th ed., stereotype. M., 2004. Vol. 4 (in Russ.).
24. James R. Maxeiner Some realism about legal certainty in the globalization of the rule of law. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1230457  (accessed: 11.03.2021).
25. Peczenik A. On Law and Reason / Preface by J.C. Hage. 2nd ed.: Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2008. P. 24.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up