AUTONOMY OF THE WILL: EVOLUTION OF JURIDICAL DOCTRINE AND LEGAL NORMS

Maximov, Vitaly; Boldyrev, Vladimir A.

doi:10.31857/S102694520025949-4

Home

Gosudarstvo i pravo

AUTONOMY OF THE WILL: EVOLUTION OF JURIDICAL DOCTRINE AND LEGAL NORMS

Annotation
References

AUTONOMY OF THE WILL: EVOLUTION OF JURIDICAL DOCTRINE AND LEGAL NORMS

PII

S102694520025949-4-1

DOI

10.31857/S102694520025949-4

Publication type

Article

Status

Approved

Authors

Vitaly Maximov

Occupation: associate professor of the department of civil law disciplines
Affiliation: St. Petersburg Law Institute (branch) of the University of the Public Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation
Address: St. Petersburg, Leninsky Prospekt, 81, Bldg. 1, sq. 214

Vladimir A. Boldyrev

Occupation: Professor of the Civil Law Department of the North-Western Branch of the Russian State University of Justice
Affiliation: Russian State University of Justice
Address: 5 Alexandrovsky Park, 197046, Saint Petersburg, Russia

Abstract

On the basis of statistical methods, the use of the term "autonomy of will" in judicial acts by the law enforcement officer is characterized. It is noted that the meaning of the relevant legal category is not sufficiently defined, which is the reason for its relatively rare (in comparison with "freedom of contract") use in the texts of court rulings. Amendments made to civil legislation concerning decisions of assemblies, pre-contractual relations and the procedure for changing and terminating multilateral agreements are interpreted as the result of a change in the legal paradigm supported by the legislator. Deeply realized over the years of the functioning of the market economy, reinforced by data from related fields of scientific knowledge, the ability to regulate public relations in a decentralized manner by the will of many people has changed the ideas about the nature of the autonomy of participants in civil turnover, the nature of centralized regulation of public relations and the meaning of legal norms.

Keywords

jurisprudence, philosophy, legal reference system, electronic library, database, content analysis, freedom of will, freedom of contract, collective cognition, cognitive science

Acknowledgment

the study has no outside funding

Received

08.06.2023

Number of characters

23979

GOST	Maximov V., Boldyrev V. AUTONOMY OF THE WILL: EVOLUTION OF JURIDICAL DOCTRINE AND LEGAL NORMS // Gosudarstvo i pravo URL: http://ras.jes.su/gp/s102694520025949-4-1-en (circulation date: 28.04.2024).
MLA	Maximov, Vitaly, Boldyrev, Vladimir A "AUTONOMY OF THE WILL: EVOLUTION OF JURIDICAL DOCTRINE AND LEGAL NORMS." Gosudarstvo i pravo DOI: 10.31857/S102694520025949-4
APA	Maximov V., Boldyrev V. (). AUTONOMY OF THE WILL: EVOLUTION OF JURIDICAL DOCTRINE AND LEGAL NORMS. Gosudarstvo i pravo DOI: 10.31857/S102694520025949-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

1. Ananyeva E. P. The modern philosophy of freedom in the contractualist dimension // European Science. 2018. No. 10(42). P. 35–37 (in Russ.).

2. Antipov A. V. Autonomy of will and freedom of choice in T. Sasa's antipsychiatric project // Philosophy and Society. 2018. No. 4(89). P. 121–128. DOI: 10.30884/jfio/2018.04.07 (in Russ.).

3. Boldyrev V. A., Svarchevsky K. G. Collective and individual cognition in the activity of a law enforcer// State and law. 2022. No. 12. pp. 139–144. DOI: 10.31857/S 102694520019230-4 (in Russ.).

4. Boldyrev V. A., Svarchevsky K. G. Legal reference systems: How to determine the future by ordering the past // Tomsk State University Journal. 2022. No. 482. P. 232–238. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/482/24 (in Russ.).

5. Braudo-Bahat Ya.. Towards a Relational Conceptualization of the Right to Personal Autonomy // Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law. 2018. Vol. 25:2. P. 114–130. https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1693&context=jgspl

6. Bublitz C. What Is Wrong with Hungry Judges? A Case Study of Legal Implications of Cognitive Science. The Hague: Eleven, 2020. 30 p. Available at: >>>> (accessed: 01.04.2023).

7. Christman J. Relational Autonomy, Liberal Individualism, and the Social Constitution of Selves // Philosophical Studies. 2004. Vol. 117. P. 143–164. DOI:10.1023/B:PHIL.0000014532.56866.5c

8. Cohen-Almagor R. Between Autonomy and State Regulation: J.S. Mill’s Elastic Paternalism // Philosophy. 2012. Vol. 87. Issue 4. Р. 557–582. DOI:10.1017/S0031819112000411

9. Cvejic Jancic O. Privacy and Autonomy in Serbian Family Law // International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family. 2013. 29 p. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3223897

10. Danziger Sh., Levav J., Avnaim-Pesso L. Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions // The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011. Apr. 26. Vol. 108. No 17. P. 6889-6892. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1018033108

11. Dworkin G. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy (Cambridge Studies in Philosophy). Cambridge University Press. 1988. 173 p. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511625206

12. Ershov V. V. Regulation of legal relations : monogr. M. : RGUP, 2020. 564 p. (in Russ.).

13. Gilmullin A. R. The hypothesis of reasonable equality in freedom: basic provisions // State and law. 2023. No. 1. P. 162–167. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520024141-6 (in Russ.).

14. Gruzdev V. V. Autonomous civil law regulation : abstract. Dis... doct. jurid. sciences'. Kursk, 2021. 378 p. (in Russ.).

15. Gruzdev V. V. The civil law principle of equality // Tomsk State University Journal. 2017. No. 418. P. 199–201. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/418/25 (in Russ.).

16. Nedelsky J. Law’s Relations. A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law. Oxford University Press, 2013. 560 p.

17. Ovchinnikov S. N. The principle of freedom of contract and neurophysiology // International Journal of Humanities and Natural Sciences. 2021. No. 5-4(56). P. 132–137. DOI: 10.24412/2500-1000-2021-5-4-132-137 (in Russ.).

18. Sellers M. An Introduction to the Value of Autonomy in Law // Autonomy in the Law. Springer, 2008. P. 1–10. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6490-6_1

19. Sieckmann J.-R. The Logic of Autonomy: Law, Morality and Autonomous Reasoning (Law and Practical Reason). Hart Publishing, 2012. 262 p.

20. Sloman S. A, Patterson R., Barbey A. K. Cognitive Neuroscience Meets the Community of Knowledge // Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. 2021. Vol. 15. Art. 675127. P. 1–11. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.675127

21. Solovyanenko N. I. Problems of implementation and protection of the rights of participants in economic relations in the conditions of the digital divide // State and Law. 2023. No. 2. P. 188–193. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520024344-9 (in Russ.).

22. Therborn G. Ambiguous Ideals and Problematic Outcomes: Democracy, Civil Society, Human Rights, and Social Justice. Democracy Reality and Responsibility // The Proceedings of the Sixth Plenary Session of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences. 23-26 February 2000. Vatican City. С. 121–150. >>>> (accessed: 28.05.2023).

23. Wiener N. Cybernetics and Society. Moscow : AST, 2019. 288 p. (in Russ.).

24. Wagner M. Non-State Actors // Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Rüdiger Wolfrum, ed., Oxford University Press, 2009. 9 p. URL: >>>> (accessed: 28.05.2023).