1. Aristotle. Collected works in 4 volumes / translated from Ancient Greek; edited by V.F. Asmus, Z.N. Mikeladze, I.D. Rozhansky, A.I. Dovatur. M.: Thought, 1976-1983 (in Russ.).
2. Asmus V.F. Platon. M.: Thought, 1969 (in Russ.).
3. Heraclitus. On Nature // The Materialists of Ancient Greece: The Collection of texts of Heraclitus, Democritus and Epicurus. M.: State Publishing House of Political Literature, 1955 (in Russ.).
4. Dialectics of the general, special and singular in law: theoretical-legal and philosophical-legal aspects: monograph / edited by E.A. Kulikov. Barnaul, 2020 (in Russ.).
5. Zakhartsev S.I., Salnikov V.P. Philosophy and Legal science. M.: Yurlitinform, 2019 (in Russ.).
6. Zakhartsev S.I. Returning to the discussion about dialectics as a methodological basis for the knowledge of law // Law enforcement monitoring. 2015. No. 1. pp. 32-39 (in Russ.).
7. Losev A.F. Dialectics of myth. Supplement to the "Dialectics of Myth": a new academic edition, corrected and supplemented. Moscow, 2021 (in Russ.).
8. Ilyenkov E. V. Dialectical logic. Essays on History and Theory. Moscow: Politizdat, 1974 (in Russ.).
9. Categories of dialectics (theoretical and methodological problems): a series of lectures / Under the general editorship of I.Ya. Loifman. Yekaterinburg, 2003 (in Russ.).
10. Kerimov D.A. Methodology of law. Subject, functions, problems of philosophy of law. M., 2000 (in Russ.).
11. Lenin V.I. Full collection of soch. M.: Gospolitizdat, 1958-1965. Vol. 29 (in Russ.).
12. Losev A.F. Essays on ancient symbolism and mythology. M.: Thought, 1993 (in Russ.).
13. Plato. Collected works in 4 volumes / General ed. by A.F. Losev, V.F. Asmus, A. A. Tahoe-Godi. M.: Mysl, 1990-1994 (in Russ.).
14. Syrykh V.M. Russian jurists at the crossroads: materialistic rationalism or subjective idealism? // Journal of Russian Law. 2016. No. 1. pp. 75-89 (in Russ.).
15. Utkin G.N. Unconditional and conditional as categories of dialectics of law // State and Law. 2021. No. 9. pp. 58-64 (in Russ.).
16. Chalmers D. The Conscious mind. In search of a fundamental theory. M: URSS: Book House "Librocom", 2013 (in Russ.).
17. Chestnov I.L. Legal understanding in the postmodern era. St. Petersburg, 2002 (in Russ.).
18. Ausland H.W. Forensic Characteristics of Socratic Argumentation //Scott G.A. (ed.) Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.
19. Berman H.J. Faith and order: the reconciliation of law and religion. Atlanta, Ga.: Scholars Press, 1993.
20. Davidson D. Mental Events. Reprinted in Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970.
21. Hammer T. Einheit und Vielheit bei Heraklit von Ephesus.Würzburg: Königshausen& Neumann, 1991.
22. Kinney A.M. The Meaning of Dialectic in Plato // Auslegung: a journal of philosophy. Kansas University Press. 1983, Vol. 10. № 3. P. 231.
23. Lincoln С. The Dialectical Path of Law. London: Lexington Books, 2021.
24. Newton S. The Dialectics of Law and Development. In: Trubek, D. M. and Santos, Alvaro, (eds.), The New Law and Economic Development: a Critical Appraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. PP. 174–202.
25. Patterson E.D. Hans Kelsen and his Pure Theory of Law // California Law Review. 1952. Vol. 40. Issue 1.
26. Robinson R. Plato’s Earlier Dialectic. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1941.
27. Scott G.A. Introduction // Scott G.A. (ed.) Does Socrates Have a Method? Rethinking the Elenchus in Plato’s Dialogues and Beyond. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 2002.
28. Vlastos G. The Socratic Elenchus // Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. 1983. № 1. PP. 27–58.