REVIEWS OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE CONTEXT OF UNIFORM INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF LEGAL NORMS IN CIVIL CASES

 
PIIS102694520024848-3-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520024848-3
Publication type Article
Status Approved
Authors
Occupation: associate professor, department of Civil Procedure Law
Affiliation: Ural Branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education «Russian State University of Justice»
Address: Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk, Energetikov street, 63
Abstract

The article explores the issue of the essence and role of judicial practice reviews approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the context of consideration of civil cases by courts. Based on the analysis of judicial practice, separate problems of the application of these reviews are considered. The conclusion is made about the need to improve legislation, including in terms of specifying the place of these reviews regarding the decisions of the Presidium and the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, as well as in terms of including the fact of the adoption of such reviews among the new circumstances allowing for the revision of judicial acts that have entered into force.

Keywordscourt, judicial practice, interpretation of legal norms, application of legal norms, Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, review of judicial practice, legal position, civil procedure, arbitration procedure.
Received14.03.2023
Number of characters17840
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

1. Belyaeva O.A. Kollaps sudebnoj praktiki v sporakh o korporativnykh zakupkakh // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava. 2018. № 10(262). S. 25-35.

2. Vasyaev A.A. Povyshenie roli Verkhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federatsii v protsesse izucheniya i obobscheniya sudebnoj praktiki // Sovremennoe pravo. 2013. № 2. S. 85-86.

3. Zaikin, S.S. Vysshij Arbitrazhnyj sud: dannye udaleny // Sravnitel'noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie. 2014. № 4(101). S. 118-144.

4. Kiselev S.V. Istochniki sudebnogo resheniya v aspekte sudebnoj reformy // Rossijskoe pravosudie. 2010. № 12(56). S. 93-96.

5. Momotov V.V. Tolkovanie pravovykh norm Verkhovnym Sudom Rossijskoj Federatsii v kontekste sovremennoj pravovoj sistemy // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2018. № 4. S. 30-39.

6. Momotov V.V. Tolkovanie pravovykh norm Verkhovnym Sudom Rossijskoj Federatsii v kontekste sovremennoj pravovoj sistemy (okonchanie) // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2018. № 5. S. 30-36.

7. Prikhod'ko I.A. Reformirovanie protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: tseli, problemy, tendentsii // Khozyajstvo i pravo. 2018. № 1(492). S. 31-57.

8. Savel'eva T.A. Sudebnaya praktika Verkhovnogo Suda RF kak osnovanie peresmotra sudebnykh aktov po novym obstoyatel'stvam v arbitrazhnom protsesse // Vestnik Saratovskoj gosudarstvennoj yuridicheskoj akademii. 2018. № 5(124). S. 218-225.

9. Fokin E.A. Dosudebnoe uregulirovanie sporov v arbitrazhnom protsesse: ehvolyutsiya i protivorechiya podkhodov sudebnoj praktiki // Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2021. № 4. S. 124-151.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up