Methods and forms of resolution of interstate disputes

The article is devoted to the search for an answer to the question about the criteria for determining the methods and forms of protection of violated or contested rights in interstate legal conflicts. The problem of dispute resolution procedures in which sovereign states and international entities act as parties is currently particularly acute. International cooperation is acquiring the broadest forms, which results not only in the improvement of the positions of states in certain areas, but also in the growth in the number of interstate and international conflicts. Based on the analysis of the domestic Russian system for the protection of rights, freedoms and legitimate interests, it was concluded that there are two alternative methods of protection: public law, based on the present position of the judicial authority over the disputing parties; and private law, in the form of arbitration. The criterion for their application in the domestic sphere is the legal nature of the disputed material relationship and the ratio of the legal statuses of the disputing subjects: “vertical” disputed legal relations allow only public legal protection, private law, “horizontal” legal relations allow arbitration, subject to the consent of both parties. It is shown that interstate legal relations in a similar way can be private law, that is, based on the equality of the member states participating in them, and “vertical”, legal relations of the coordination type, in which sovereign states renounce part of their sovereignty and voluntarily submit to the jurisdiction of a certain international judicial body. The conclusion is formulated that in interstate conflicts both methods of protection retain their significance and are applied on the basis of the criterion of the correlation of the legal statuses of the persons (states) involved in the case. It is shown that the arbitration of interstate disputes (international arbitration) retains all the features and properties of the arbitration of “internal” cases and should be applied solely on the basis of the will of the states - parties to the disputed material legal relationship.

Keywords

rights protection system, methods and forms of rights protection, justice, arbitration court, interstate relations, international integration, integration justice

Received

27.07.2022

Publication date

29.03.2023

Number of characters

28280

Cite

GOST	Mikhailova E. Methods and forms of resolution of interstate disputes // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2023. – Issue 3 C. 128-137 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S102694520024819-1-1 (circulation date: 20.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S102694520024819-1
MLA	Mikhailova, Ekaterina "Methods and forms of resolution of interstate disputes." Gosudarstvo i pravo 3 (2023):128-137. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520024819-1
APA	Mikhailova E. (2023). Methods and forms of resolution of interstate disputes. Gosudarstvo i pravo (3), pp.128-137 DOI: 10.31857/S102694520024819-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 219

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Abdulloev F. The Economic Court of the CIS in the Eurasian space // Eurasian legal journal. 2011. No. 2 (33) (in Russ.).

2. Alekseev A.S. On the doctrine of the legal nature of the state and state power. M., 1895. P. 12 (in Russ.).

3. Alekseev A.S. Russian State Law: lecture notes. 4th ed. M., 1897. P. 5–7 (in Russ.).

4. Anufrieva L.P. International judicial bodies in Eurasian integration (problems of the theory of International Law) // Actual problems of Russ. law. 2015. No. 10 (59). P. 218 (in Russ.).

5. Bezborodov Yu. S. Integration as an international legal method of legal convergence // Lex russica. 2017. No. 12 (133). P. 128 (in Russ.).

6. Bezborodov Yu. S. On international legal forms of legal convergence // Russ. law: education, practice, science. 2017. No. 4. P. 57 (in Russ.).

7. Vaskovsky E.V. Textbook of civil procedure. M., 2003. P. 18, 371 (in Russ.).

8. Vitsyn A.I. Arbitration Court of Russian Law, historical and dogmatic reasoning. M., 1856. P. 15, 16 (in Russ.).

9. Volova L.I. Mechanism for resolving international investment disputes // Economic Herald of the Rostov State University. 2010. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 82 (in Russ.).

10. Golmsten A.H. Textbook of Russian civil procedure. 5th ed., rev. and add. SPb., 1913. P. 154 (in Russ.).

11. Doronina N.G. Actual problems of protecting the interests of the state in economic relations // Journal of Russ. law. 2005. No. 12. P. 78 (in Russ.).

12. Dorskaya A.A., Dorsky A.A. International integration organizations and the problem of formation of supranational law // Legal Science. 2016. No. 4. P. 106 (in Russ.).

13. Iksanov I.S., Kosyrev I. Yu. Problems of supranational legal regulation on the example of the Court of the Eurasian Economic Union // Humanities. Herald of the Financial University. 2017. No. 5. P. 7 (in Russ.).

14. Ispolinov A.S. What is hidden behind the catchy term “integration justice”? // Law. HSE Journal. 2017. No. 3. P. 108, 109, 112 (in Russ.).

15. History of Roman Law. A manual for lectures by Professor of Moscow University V.M. Khvostov. 3rd ed. (rev. and add.). M., 1907. P. 4, 5 (in Russ.).

16. Kapustin A. Ya. International Law and challenges of the XXI century // Journal of Russ. law. 2014. No. 7. P. 8 (in Russ.).

17. Kapustin A. Ya., Kovler A.I., Belyalova A.M. et al. The practice of considering interstate complaints in international courts: the history of the issue and prospects // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2020. No. 6. P. 117 (in Russ.).

18. Kasyanov R.A., Torkunova E.A. Ensuring human rights in the post-Soviet space // Herald of MGIMO University. 2015. No. 5 (44). P. 57 (in Russ.).

19. Kolokolov N.A. Formation of judicial power in self–determined states: fundamentals of genesis and evolution management // Protection of rights in Russia and other countries of the Council of Europe: current state and problems of harmonization: collection of scientific articles Krasnodar - St. Petersburg, 2011. P. 193 (in Russ.).

20. Korkunov N.M. Lectures on the General theory of law. SPb., 2003. P. 293 - 295 (in Russ.).

21. Lazareva T.P., Shestakova M.P. Some problems of choosing the applicable law in the practice of resolving foreign economic disputes // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2019. No. 6. P. 71 (in Russ.).

22. Nefediev E.A. Textbook of Russian civil procedure. 3rd ed. M., 1908. P. 5 (in Russ.).

23. Neshataeva T.N. Integration and supranationalism // Herald of the Perm University. Legal sciences. 2014. Issue 2 (24). P. 244 (in Russ.).

24. Orlova I.A. Decisions of international transnational and foreign jurisdictional bodies: problems of recognition and enforcement // Herald of the Institute of Legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2018. No. 5 (54). P. 106 (in Russ.).

25. Pavlov E. Ya. Constitutional and legal mechanism for the implementation of foreign relations of the Russian Federation // Herald of MGIMO University. 2012. No. 2. P. 120 (in Russ.).

26. Peshin N.L. On the status and jurisdiction of the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2019. No. 5. P. 126 (in Russ.).

27. Rafalyuk E.E. International integration: methodological problems of research // Journal of Russ. law. 2014. No. 3. P. 47 (in Russ.).

28. Rafalyuk E.E. International courts and integration in Latin America // All-Russian Journal of Scientific Publications. 2011. September. P. 63 (in Russ.).

29. Rafalyuk E.E., Zaloilo M.V., Vlasova N.V. Legal models of integration associations of the states of Eurasia and Latin America // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2017. No. 2. P. 104 (in Russ.).

30. Solntsev A.M., Golubev V.V. WTO and regional integration associations: competition of jurisdictions and applicable principles of law in resolving interstate disputes // Herald of the Volgograd State University. Ser. 5. Jurisprudence. 2013. No. 1 (18). P. 95 (in Russ.).

31. Tiunov O.I., Kashirkina A.A., Morozov A.N. The status of international interdepartmental agreements of the Russian Federation // Journal of Russ. law. 2007. No. 1. P. 117 (in Russ.).

32. Tikhomirov Yu. A. Comparative jurisprudence: development of concepts and public practice // Journal of Russ. law. 2006. No. 6. P. 8, 9 (in Russ.).

33. Chaika K.L. The Court of the integration association as an international judicial body // Proceedings of the ISL of the RAS. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 147, 148 (in Russ.).

34. Chechina N.A. Elected proceedings on civil procedure. SPb., 2004. P. 20 (in Russ.).