Court and notaries: perspectives of ontological unity

Occupation: Acting Head of the Procedural Law Sector of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Gosudarstvo i pravo

Edition

Issue 12

Pages

38-44

Abstract

Referring to the research on the history of the emergence of notaries in Russia, a single ontological essence of the court and notaries is shown. Currently, the jurisdiction of the courts (both arbitration and general jurisdiction) is a number of so-called “indisputable” cases. These are cases of special and order proceedings. A significant part of them are cases on the establishment of legal facts, the consideration and resolution of which is carried out by the court outside the framework of the civilistic procedural form, but solely on the basis of the documents submitted by the applicant substantiating the stated requirements. Many scientists have already expressed the idea to transfer these cases from the jurisdiction of the courts to the notaries. However, it should be borne in mind that the notary is a body of indisputable jurisdiction, and notaries are not entitled to consider disputes about the law. At the same time, some cases of special and writ proceedings are of a controversial nature - for example, cases of depriving or restricting the legal capacity of a citizen; on involuntary psychiatric examination, on the recovery of alimony, etc. Therefore, it is necessary to distinguish between cases of special and writ proceedings into controversial and indisputable; notaries are invited to submit all cases of establishing legal facts. It is also proposed to expand the competence of the notary by including cases on amendments to the documents of a citizen. It is proposed to establish mandatory notarization of all out-of-court conciliation agreements.

Keywords

court, notary, special proceedings, writ proceedings, cases on establishment of legal facts, dispute over law

Received

27.08.2022

Publication date

22.12.2022

Number of characters

25766

Cite

GOST	Mikhailova E. Court and notaries: perspectives of ontological unity // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2022. – Issue 12 C. 38-44 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S102694520023348-3-1 (circulation date: 27.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S102694520023348-3
MLA	Mikhailova, Ekaterina "Court and notaries: perspectives of ontological unity." Gosudarstvo i pravo 12 (2022):38-44. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520023348-3
APA	Mikhailova E. (2022). Court and notaries: perspectives of ontological unity. Gosudarstvo i pravo (12), pp.38-44 DOI: 10.31857/S102694520023348-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 235

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Argunov V.V. Proceedings to establish facts of legal significance: in court or at a notary? // Herald of the Moscow University. Ser. 11 “Law”. 2013. No. 2. P. 62 - 70 (in Russ.).

2. Borisova E.A. History of the Russian legislation on notaries and notarial activity // Notarial Bulletin. 2017. No. 7. P. 52 - 63 (in Russ.).

3. Vaskovsky E.V. Textbook of Civil Procedure. M., 2003. P. 414, 415 (in Russ.).

4. The Great Reform: to the 150th anniversary of Judicial statutes: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. The Charter of Civil Proceedings / ed. by E.A. Borisova. M., 2014. P. 284, 285 (in Russ.).

5. Gadzhiev G.A. Economic efficiency, legal ethics and trust in the state // Journal of Russ. law. 2012. No. 1. P. 10 - 21 (in Russ.).

6. Galikeeva I.G. From the history of the development of the notary in Russia // The Rule of Law: theory and practice. 2015. No. 3 (41). P. 61, 62 (in Russ.).

7. Ghukasyan R.E. Selected works on civil procedure. M., 2008. P. 187 (in Russ.).

8. Korsik K.A. Correlation of the Russian state and the notary: historical aspect and trends of its modern development // Notary Bulletin. 2020. No. 12. P. 6 - 13 (in Russ.).

9. Kostuba A.V. Procedural means of establishing legal facts // Herald of the Bashkir University. 2015. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 1144–1147 (in Russ.).

10. Maleshin D. Ya. Assistance of the notary to judicial reform // Herald of the SPbU. Right. 2020. No. 1. P. 67 - 86 (in Russ.).

11. Scientific and practical commentary on the Civil Procedure Code of the RSFSR / ed. by R.F. Kallistratova, L.F. Lesnitskaya, V.K. Puchinsky. M., 1976. P. 364 (in Russ.).

12. Nefediev E.A. Textbook of Russian Civil Procedure. 3rd ed. M., 1903. P. 356 (in Russ.).

13. Onopko T.A. Law enforcement activity of the court in the proceedings to establish facts of legal significance // Actual problems of Russ. law. 2009. No. 3. P. 361–367 (in Russ.).

14. Posulikhina N.S., Kozyreva A.B. Alternative dispute resolution methods as a measure to reduce the burden on the courts: comparative legal research (Part 1) // Lex russica. 2021. Vol. 74. No. 8. P. 142 - 149 (in Russ.).

15. Puchinsky V.K. From the creative heritage: collection of works. M., 2022. P. 46 (in Russ.).

16. Reshetnikova I.V. Ways to optimize the arbitration process // Perm legal almanac. 2020. No. 3. P. 118–123 (in Russ.).

17. Rozhkova M.A. The concept of a dispute about Civil Law // Journal of Russ. law. 2005. No. 4. P. 98–102 (in Russ.).

18. Slepchenko E.V. Simplified procedure for consideration of civil cases // Leningradsky yurid. journal. 2010. No. 1. P. 114–129 (in Russ.).

19. Chechina N.A. Elected proceedings on Civil Procedure. SPb., 2004. P. 370 (in Russ.).

20. Shakaryan M.S. Elected proceedings. SPb., 2014. P. 631 (in Russ.).