All
 
|
 
 


Legal models of changing charges in court: comparative legal analysis of the procedures of Russian and foreign legal proceedings
 
PIIS102694520023299-9-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520023299-9
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Sergey Burmagin 
Occupation: Deputy Chairman of the Arkhangelsk Regional Court in Honorable Resignation, leading researcher at the Institute of Law
Affiliation: Volgograd State University
Address: Russian Federation,
Pavel Barabanov
Occupation: Deputy Chairman of the Severodvinsk City Court of the Arkhangelsk Region in Honorable Retirement
Affiliation: Severodvinsk City Court of the Arkhangelsk Region
Address: Russian Federation
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 12
Pages45-53
Abstract

In the criminal proceedings of the Russian Federation the problem of improving the procedure for changing the charges brought by the preliminary investigation body in the direction of worsening of the defendant’s situation is relevant. The authors of this article, in order to find the optimal legal model for changing the criminal charge in court by increasing or significantly amending it while ensuring the right of the accused to defense and the fairness of the trial, using such methods of scientific knowledge as dialectical, formal legal, statistical and comparative legal analysis reveal shortcomings of existing Russian procedures, conduct comparative study of models of legal regulation of the issues of changing charges in court and their practical application in some European and Asian countries, analyze these models from the point of view of ensuring the right of the accused to defense and taking into account the positions of the European Court of Human Rights. According to the results of the conducted research the conclusions are made about the possibility and expediency of modernizing the model used in the Russian Federation for changing the charge submitted to the court to a more serious or significantly different in factual circumstances by replacing the existing procedural order with meeting the requirements of the rights of the accused procedure for changing the original charge by the prosecutor under the supervision of the court directly at the court session

Keywordscriminal procedure, court, prosecutor, prosecution, defendant’s right to defence, return of case to prosecutor, change of charge, trial, foreign criminal procedure
Received14.02.2022
Publication date22.12.2022
Number of characters34866
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 347

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Balakshin V.S. Return of the criminal case by the court to the prosecutor to eliminate obstacles to its consideration or to conduct an additional investigation // Herald of the Udmurt University. 2018. Vol. 28. Issue 1. P. 81–88 (in Russ.).
2. Barabanov P.K. The Criminal Process of Spain. M., 2021. P. 262 - 264 (in Russ.).
3. Barabanov P.K. The Criminal Process of Italy. M., 2019. P. 323, 324 (in Russ.).
4. Barabanov P.K. The Criminal Process of France. M., 2016. P. 454 - 456 (in Russ.).
5. Barabanov P.K. Criminal Process of Germany. M., 2014. P. 262 - 264 (in Russ.).
6. Burmagin S.V. Correction in court of the shortcomings of the prosecution approved by the prosecutor: ways to solve the problem: materials of the VII International Scientific and Practical Conference “Judicial reform in Russia: past, present, future” (Kutafin readings). M., 2015. Book 2. P. 257, 258 (in Russ.).
7. Butov V.N. The Criminal Process of Austria. Krasnoyarsk, 1988. P. 108, 109 (in Russ.).
8. Gavrilov B. Ya. Modern criminal policy of Russia. M., 2008. P. 155 - 171 (in Russ.).
9. Grigoryan V.L. The court’s return of the criminal case to the prosecutor to change the charge as a necessary attribute of the legal, reasonable and fair sentence // State and Law. 2019. No. 8. P. 53 - 61 (in Russ.).
10. Dolgikh T.N. The legal position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation as a factor in the revival and development of the institution of returning criminal cases to the prosecutor, including for the prosecution of a more serious crime // Judicial power and criminal procedure. 2016. No. 3. P. 97 - 101 (in Russ.).
11. Zaeva O.P. Actual problems of returning criminal cases for additional investigation // Society and law. 2017. No. 3. P. 121 - 124 (in Russ.).
12. Kuryakhova T.V. Establishing factual circumstances as a condition for the court to return a criminal case to strengthen the prosecution // Legislation and practice. 2019. No. 2. P. 46 - 49 (in Russ.).
13. Lisafyeva O.B. Return of the criminal case to the prosecutor in the criminal justice system of Russia: abstract ... PhD in Law. N. Novgorod, 2010. P. 8 (in Russ.).
14. Lupin I.A. Return of criminal cases for additional investigation in the Criminal Process of Russia: abstract ... PhD in Law. M., 2008. P. 7 - 11 (in Russ.).
15. McBride Jeremy. Human rights and criminal procedure. The practice of the European Court of Human Rights. M., 2018. P. 332 - 338, 487 - 492 (in Russ.).
16. Mashovets A.O. Change of the charge, full or partial rejection of it by the public prosecutor during the trial // Herald of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017. No. 2. P. 96 (in Russ.).
17. Muravyev K.V., Bulatov B.B. Changing the prosecution in court: further adjustment of the mechanism of the relationship between the state prosecution and the court is required // Herald of the East Siberian Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2018. No. 4. P. 106 (in Russ.).
18. Proshlyakov A.D., Mashovets A.O. The mechanism of changing charges in court – continuation of the discussion // Herald of the Udmurt University. 2018. Vol. 28. Issue 1. P. 142, 143 (in Russ.).
19. Ryabinina T.K. The activity of the court for the appointment and preparation of a criminal case for a court session in the mechanism of the implementation of judicial power. M., 2021. P. 136 - 140, 166-167 (in Russ.).
20. Ryabinina T.K. Institute of the return of a criminal case to the prosecutor in the system of criminal procedural means ensuring the victim's right to protection from crimes and access to justice // All-Russian Criminological Journal. 2020. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 512 - 526 (in Russ.).
21. Sviridov M.K. Elimination by the court of investigative errors in judicial proceedings // Herald of the Tomsk State University. Law. 2015. No. 2. P. 105 (in Russ.).
22. Trisheva A.A. The court’s return of the criminal case to the prosecutor: genesis, current state, ways of improvement: abstract ... PhD in Law. M., 2010. P. 25 (in Russ.).
23. Cheremisina T.V. When the courts return a criminal case to the prosecutor to qualify the act as more serious // Criminal process. 2018. No. 8. P. 54 - 59 (in Russ.).
24. Shishkov A.A. Implementation in the criminal Procedure Law of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the court’s return of a criminal case to the prosecutor // Questions Russian and International law. 2019. Vol. 9. No. 7A. P. 284, 285 (in Russ.).
25. Birklbauer A. Strafprozessrecht Eine Einführung für das Grundstudium. Linz. 2018. S. 253–256.
26. Catena V., Domínguez V. Derecho procesal penal. Valencia, 2019. P. 473, 474.
27. Debove F., Falletti F., Debré J. Précis – de droit pénal et de procédure pénale. Paris, 2018. P. 102–108.
28. Guinchard S., Buisson J. Procédure pénale. Paris, 2018. P. 1217–1220.
29. Keulen B., Knigge G. Strafprocesrecht. Deventer, 2020. Р. 450–453.
30. Kirchbacher K. Einführung in das Strafprozessrecht. Wien, 2018. S. 144–146.
31. Ostos J. Manual de derecho procesal penal. Sevilla, 2020. P. 327, 328.
32. Ragione L. Manuale di diritto processuale penale. Molfetta, 2018. Р. 654–663.
33. Seiler S. Strafprozessrecht. Wien, 2020. S. 287–289.
34. Tonini P. Manuale di procedura penale. Milano, 2017. Р. 641–642.
35. Vergés E. Procédure pénale. Paris, 2020. P. 327, 328.
36. Walter T. Strafprozessrecht. Ein Lehrbuch für Studenten und angehende Praktiker. Tübingen, 2020. S. 179–182.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up