All
 
|
 
 


About the legal nature, principles and legal status of participants in the judicial conciliation procedure
 
PIIS102694520022613-5-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520022613-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Ekaterina Mikhailova 
Occupation: Acting Head of the Procedural Law Sector of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 10
Pages18-30
Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of questions about the legal nature of the institution of judicial conciliation, its principles, the legal status of a judicial conciliator, the procedural rights and obligations of participants in judicial conciliation in civil and arbitration proceedings. The author proceeds from the fact that the judicial conciliation procedure is implemented within the framework of civil, arbitration and administrative legal proceedings, regulated by the norms of procedural legislation, due to which it is a kind of public law activity. Accordingly, a conclusion is made about the public powers of the judicial conciliator and the “vertical” nature of the relationship connecting him with the parties to the legal conflict during the judicial conciliation procedure. At the same time, attention is drawn to the specific nature of the direction of judicial reconciliation (not the resolution of the conflict, but its settlement), as well as the specific principles of this procedure (confidentiality). The procedural rights and obligations of the parties to judicial reconciliation, which are derived from the general rights and obligations of the parties in arbitration proceedings, are analyzed. The question of the relationship between the principles of judicial conciliation procedure and the general principles of civil and arbitration proceedings is also considered. Unlike out-of-court conciliation, judicial conciliation procedures are part of the general civil procedural form, therefore their organization and conduct must be carried out in accordance with the principles of civil and arbitration process.

Keywordscivil process, arbitration process, out-of-court conciliation, judicial conciliation, judicial conciliation procedure, judicial conciliator, participants in judicial conciliation proceedings, parties to judicial conciliation, procedural rights and obligations of participants in judicial conciliation proceedings, principles of civil and arbitration legal proceedings
Received27.05.2022
Publication date24.11.2022
Number of characters46908
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 295

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Alekseev S.S. Theory of law. M., 1995. P. 265 (in Russ.).
2. Arbitration process: textbook / ed. by V.V. Yarkov. 2nd ed., reprint and add. M., 2003. P. 211 (in Russ.).
3. Vaskovsky E.V. Textbook of civil procedure. M., 2003. P. 179, 180 (in Russ.).
4. Golmsten A. Kh. Textbook of Russian civil procedure. 5th ed., rev. and add. St. Petersburg, 1913. P. 141 (in Russ.).
5. Grafsky V.G. Principles of legality and justice in the history of legislation of Russia and Western European states // Proceedings of the ISL of the RAS. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 6. P. 15 (in Russ.).
6. Gukasyan R.E. Selected works on civil procedure. M., 2008. P. 55 (in Russ.).
7. Ermoshin G.T. Retired judge: status, rights, duties // Law. HSE Journal. 2012. No. 4. P. 88 (in Russ.).
8. Kalinovsky K.B. Legality and types of criminal proceedings: dis. ... PhD in Law. SPb., 1999 (in Russ.).
9. Kozachenko I. Ya., Sergeev D.N., Vasiliev A.M. Reconciliation in law: compromise or concession? Review of the 17th International Scientific and Practical Conference in memory of M.I. Kovalev // Russian law: education, practice, science. 2020. No. 3. P. 111 (in Russ.).
10. Limar T.G. The legal basis for the implementation of conciliation procedures in civil disputes // Herald of the SSSA. 2018. No. 6 (125). P. 139 (in Russ.).
11. Mishchenko E.V., Letuta T.V. Principles of judicial reconciliation, mediation and arbitration: comparative legal aspect // Russian law: education, practice, science. 2019. No. 2. P. 6 (in Russ.).
12. Moiseev S.V. Understanding the principle of dispositivity in the arbitration process // Herald of the Moscow University. Ser. 11 “Law”. 2008. No. 1. P. 14 (in Russ.).
13. Scientific and practical commentary on the CPC of the RSFSR / ed. by R.F. Kallistratova, L.F. Lesnitskaya, V.K. Puchinsky. M., 1976. P. 55 (in Russ.).
14. Nefediev E.A. Textbook of Russian civil procedure. 3rd ed. M., 1908. P. 5 (in Russ.).
15. Osipov Yu. K. Elements and stages of application of the norms of Soviet Civil Procedural Law // A brief anthology of the Ural procedural thought: 55 years of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law Academy / ed. by V.V. Yarkov. Ekaterinburg, 2004 (in Russ.).
16. Dictionary of foreign words and expressions / author-comp. N.V. Coward, T.G. Shubina. Minsk, 1997. P. 389 (in Russ.).
17. Chechina N.A. Elected proceedings on civil procedure. SPb., 2004. P. 21 (in Russ.).
18. Chechot D.M. Elected proceedings on civil procedure. SPb., 2005. P. 89 (in Russ.).
19. Shakaryan M.S. Elected proceedings. SPb., 2014. P. 578 (in Russ.).
20. Sherstyuk V.M. Theoretical problems of the development of Civil Procedural, Arbitration Procedural Law and enforcement proceedings in the Russian Federation. M., 2021. P. 123 (in Russ.).
21. Yaroshenko T.V. The principle of dispositivity in civil procedure as a continuation of dispositive principles in civil substantive law // Herald of Kant BFU. Ser.: Humanities and social sciences. 2006. No. 9. P. 24–30 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up