All
 
|
 
 


Protection of property rights of children in case of acquisition of residential premises at the expense of maternity capital
 
PIIS102694520021585-4-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520021585-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Nataliya V. Letova 
Occupation: Leading researcher of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: The Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 8
Pages121-128
Abstract

The article discusses the problematic aspects of the realization of the child's right to housing, which was acquired at the expense of the maternity capital. The author examines the issues arising in practice in connection with the obligation of parents to conclude agreements on determining the shares in the right to housing, analyzes the main difficulties associated with its conclusion, determining its legal essence, presents the main approaches to determining the shares of the parties to the agreement. The author substantiates the need to allocate the housing status of a child, proves that its content is formed, among other things, by the norms of a special law on maternity capital, and suggests ways to protect the housing rights of a child in case of acquisition of housing by means of maternity capital

Keywordsfamily policy of the state, social support for families with children, maternity capital, children, spouses, family, family members, housing, shares, property of spouses, common property, shared ownership, agreement, notarial form, protection of the rights of the child, property rights of the child
Received28.02.2022
Publication date15.09.2022
Number of characters28931
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 326

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. REFERENCES
2. Alekseev S.S. General theory of law. M., 2002. P. 140, 141 (in Russ.).
3. Bespalov Yu. F. Some questions of the child’s family capacity // Notary. 2005. No. 2. P. 13 - 23 (in Russ.).
4. Bratus S.N. On the correlation of civil legal capacity and subjective civil rights // Soviet State and Law. 1949. No. 8. P. 35 (in Russ.).
5. Webers Ya. R. Legal personality of citizens in Civil and Family Law. Riga, 1976 (in Russ.).
6. Letova N.V. The legal status of children under the legislation of the Russian Federation. M., 2011. P. 47, 138 (in Russ.).
7. Letova N.V. The family status of a child: problems of theory and practice. M., 2018. P. 33, 80 (in Russ.).
8. Makarov O.V. Objects of civil rights: present and future // Notary. 2017. No. 5. P. 16 (in Russ.).
9. Meyer D.I. Russian Civil Law: in 2 parts. M., 1997. Part 1. P. 85 (in Russ.).
10. Nechaeva A.M. On the legal capacity and capacity of individuals // State and Law. 2001. No. 2. P. 29 - 34 (in Russ.).
11. Review of judicial practice in cases related to the realization of the right to maternal (family) capital (approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on 22.06.2016) // Notary Bulletin. 2016. No. 9. P. 21 (in Russ.).
12. Pergament A.I. Grounds for the emergence and essence of parental rights // Legal issues of family and upbringing of children. M., 1968. P. 59 (in Russ.).
13. Family Law: textbook / ed. by Yu. F. Bespalov, O.A. Egorova, O. Yu. Ilyina. 2nd ed. reprint and add. M., 2015. P. 98 (in Russ.).
14. Yakimov A. Yu. The status of the subject of law (theoretical issues) // State and Law. 2003. No. 4. P. 9 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up