Right to remix: ideas and original forms of musical works

Occupation: Deputy Director of the UNESCO Chair on Copyright, Related, Cultural and Information Rights
Affiliation: National Research University “Higher School of Economics”
Address: Russian Federation,

Journal name

Gosudarstvo i pravo

Edition

Issue 8

Pages

47-62

Abstract

The modern stage of development of creativity is characterized by an increase in the manufacturability of this type of activity. The art of making popular music fits into this trend, highlighting its advantages and disadvantages most vividly. The peculiarity of popular music production is the repetition of standard expressive means, which have proven to be attractive. The copying of popular fragments and spectacular musical techniques became widespread, resulting in the formation of sound remix culture. Against this background, the number of disputes over the boundaries of legal borrowing of musical material has increased in the courts both in Russia and abroad. In the media sphere, examples of unlawful appropriation of fragments from popular songs that violate the rights of their composers, performers, and producers of phonograms are discussed. To resolve such disputes, specialized procedures have been developed, the results of which are criticized. This article discusses various approaches to the legal qualification of copying musical material. The phenomenon of the formation of musical standards, repetitive elements, techniques, and clichés, which are proposed to be classified as unguarded musical ideas at the doctrinal level, is investigated. The methods used to establish copyright infringement, to identify the facts of unlawful appropriation of musical material, and significant similarity of works are analyzed. Our attention is drawn to the test of the unique quality of a musical work and its justification from the point of view of the principles of copyright. To make decisions on music copying cases, we propose to use data on the quantitative ratio of protected and unprotected material in the compared works, as well as on the sources of borrowing that can be obtained using computer music recognition tools

Keywords

musical remix, derivative work, borrowing, appropriation, plagiarism, free idea, unique quality test

Received

09.03.2021

Publication date

15.09.2022

Number of characters

62082

Cite

GOST	Budnik R. Right to remix: ideas and original forms of musical works // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2022. – Issue 8 C. 47-62 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S102694520021575-3-1 (circulation date: 28.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S102694520021575-3
MLA	Budnik, Ruslan "Right to remix: ideas and original forms of musical works." Gosudarstvo i pravo 8 (2022):47-62. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520021575-3
APA	Budnik R. (2022). Right to remix: ideas and original forms of musical works. Gosudarstvo i pravo (8), pp.47-62 DOI: 10.31857/S102694520021575-3

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 364

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Volodina E. Dispute about two seconds: can sampling be considered plagiarism? Deutsche Welle, 2015 [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: URL: https://p.dw.com/p/1HD63 (accessed: 03.09. 2020) (in Russ.).

2. Dovgalyuk A., Glonina V. Processing of a work vs “parallel” creativity: concept, criteria of differentiation // Civilistics. 2018. No. 3 (in Russ.).

3. Dozortsev V.A. Intellectual rights: System. Tasks of codification: sat. art. M., 2003. P. 42 - 44 (in Russ.).

4. Masik K. Where to download samples and sound effects: 11 catalogs with free sounds. Same sound, 2020 [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://samesound.ru/soft/88126-free-samples-libraries (accessed: 24.02.2021) (in Russ.).

5. Filippova A. Remakes are a noticeable trend of cinema. We recall the most successful ones in 20 years. Online publishing house BURO. 2019 [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: URL: https://www.buro247.ru/culture/cinema/13-dec-2019-the-best-remakes.html (accessed: 18.02.2021) (in Russ.).

6. Akdeniz C. The Pareto Principle. IntroBooks, 2019. P. 7.

7. Bosher H. Has Skidmore v Led Zeppelin changed US music copyright infringement rules for better or worse? 2020 [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: URL: https://ipkitten.blogspot.com/2020/03/has-skidmore-v-led-zeppelin-changed-us.html (accessed: 16.02.2021).

8. Bruce A. Lehman. Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure: The Report of the Working Group on Intellectual Property Rights. 1995. P. 104.

9. Chused R.H. A Copyright Anthology: The Technology Frontier. Anderson Publishing Company, 1998. P. 260.

10. Colston C. Principles of Intellectual Property Law. Cavendish Publishing, 1999. P. 225.

11. Constine J. Instead of stealing instruments, musicians turn to Splice. TechCrunch, Verizon Media, 2018 [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: URL: https://techcrunch.com/2018/04/16/splice-sounds / (accessed: 11.10.2020).

12. Deahl D. Justin Bieber was accused of stealing a melody, but it’s actually a royalty-free sample you can buy online. The Verge, 2020 [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: URL: https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/17/21140838/justin-bieber-changes-running-over-asher-monroe-synergy-splice-sample-melody (accessed: 11.10.2020).

13. Ferguson K. Everything is a Remix, 2015 [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: URL: https://www.everythingisaremix.info/blog/everything-is-a-remix-remastered (accessed: 17.02.2021).

14. Geoghegan M.W., Klass D. Podcast Solutions: The Complete Guide to Podcasting. Apress, 2006. P. 45.

15. Goodrich A.J. Complete Musical Analysis: A System Designed to Cultivate the Art of Analyzing and Criticising and to Assist in the Performance and Understanding of the Works of the Great Composers of the Different Epochs. J. Church Company, 1889. P. 282.

16. Hindemith P., Mendel A. Methods of Music Theory, 30 MUSICAL Q. 20, 24–25 (1944).

17. Landry Ch., Bianchini F. The Creative City. Demos, 1995. P. 20.

18. Langford S. The Remix Manual: The Art and Science of Dance Music Remixing with Logic. CRC Press, 2014.

19. Livingston M., Urbinato J. Copyright Infringement of Music: Whether What Sounds Alike is Alike. Vand. J. Ent.&Tech., 15, 2013. P. 227–231, 291–295. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2050560

20. Lund Jamie. An Empirical Examination of the Lay Listener Test in Music Composition Copyright Infringement (March 29, 2012). URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2030509

21. McIntyre H. More And More, It's The Remix That's Actually The Hit. Forbes, 2016 [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: URL: https://www.forbes.com/sites/hughmcintyre/2016/03/27/more-and-more-its-the-remix-thats-actually-the-hit/#4bb7d2505bf4 (accessed: 16.02.2021).

22. Milner G. They Really Don't Make Music Like They Used To. The New York Times, 2019 [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/07/opinion/what-these-grammy-songs-tell-us-about-the-loudness-wars.html (accessed: 18.02.2021).

23. Osborne R. Philosophy in Art. Zidane, 2008. P. 10.

24. Owen H. Music Theory Resource Book. Oxford University Press, 2000.

25. Rahmatian A. Concepts of Music and Copyright: How Music Perceives Itself and How Copyright Perceives Music. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015. P. 35, 36.

26. Santiago J.M. The “Blurred Lines” of Copyright Law: Setting a New Standard for Copyright Infringement in Music, 83 Brook. L. Rev, 2017. P. 297, 307, 316.

27. Scruton R. Rhythm, melody and harmony. “Music in the Western tradition is spread out in three dimensions: rhythm, melody and harmony”. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy and Music / ed. by T. Gracyk, A. Kania. Routledge, 2011. P. 24.

28. Shelvock M.T. Cloud-Based Music Production: Sampling, Synthesis, and Hip-Hop. CRC Press, 2020. P. 27.

29. Swindali T. Music Elements: Music Theory, Songwriting, Lyrics&Creativity Explained, 2020. P. 110 - 113.

30. Tapscott R. District Court Finds Katy Perry's ‘Dark Horse' Not Substantially Similar to ‘Joyful Noise' Ostinato [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: URL: https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2020/03/21/district-court-katy-perrys-dark-horse-not-substantially-similar-joyful-noise/id=120058 / (accessed: 16.02.2021).

31. Tracy M. Copyright law and harmonic structure. Jazz Research Papers. 1991. International Association of Jazz Educators. URL: http://www.michaeltracy.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/copyright_law.pdf

32. Villa L. Hispanic Heritage 2020: The Beat Goes On With 11 Iconic Remixes. Billboard Media, 2020 [Electronic resource]. - Access mode: URL: https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/latin/9449580/hispanic-heritage-2020-11-iconic-remixes (accessed: 18.02.2021).