Property law in the reflection of foreign Civil Law

 
PIIS102694520020674-2-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520020674-2
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Head of the Department of Civil Law, Kuban State University
Affiliation: Kuban State University
Address: Russian Federation, Krasnodar, Aksayskaya str., 40/1, sq. 28
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 12
Pages145-151
Abstract

The active search for the regularities of the development of real-legal relations to complete the modernization of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation makes the comparative legal analysis of the institutions of foreign real law with domestic analogues relevant. The author, based on the publications of foreign civilists, presents a new look at the understanding of property law, which connected civil law with geometry. Presents the results of the search for a new essence of property rights and the periodization of its social growth. In the orbit of attention is the search for new solutions for the civil status of animals, which is becoming more and more independent in comparison with inanimate objects, as well approaches to understanding the rights to human biological material. Finally, the author expresses his opinion about new opportunities for the development of such ancient property rights as easements and emphyteusis in modern economic realities.

Keywordscivil legislation, property law, limited property rights, property right, easement, emphyteusis, good faith, justice, objects of civil rights
Received15.06.2022
Publication date22.12.2022
Number of characters36769
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 250

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Brodsky I.A. The power of the elements: an essay. SPb., 2010. P. 354 (in Russ.).

2. Civil Law: in 4 vols. Vol. 2 / res. ed. E.A. Sukhanov. M., 2005. P. 146 (in Russ.).

3. Azzena L. Dialogo tra Corti intorno al diritto di proprietà (Dialogue between Courts about the right to property) // Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos. 2020. No. 120. P. 319 - 339. DOI: 10.9732/P.0034-7191.2020V120P319

4. Björkman B., Hansson S.O. Bodily rights and property rights // Journal of Medical Ethics. 2006. Vol. 32. P. 209 - 214.

5. Butler N., Madhloom O. Rethinking Property Law modules: putting theory into practice // The Law Teacher. 2016. Vol. 51. No. 1-13. P. 440 - 452. DOI: 10.1080/03069400.2016.1201746

6. Gilmour J. Our Bodies: Property Rights in Human Tissue // Canadian Journal of Law and Society. 1993. Vol. 8. Iss. 2. P. 113 - 138. DOI: 10.1017/S0829320100003197

7. Gordilho H., Botteau L. The paths towards a new legal status for animals in France // Revista de Direito Civil Contemporâneo. 2021. Vol. 27. No. 8. P. 161 - 178.

8. Jalil N.I., Arshad A.H. Reconciliation of Right to Easement between Surface and Stratum Owner in Underground Development in Malaysia // Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory. 2019. Vol. 22. No. 3.

9. Kurki V. Animals, slaves, and corporations: analyzing legal thinghood // German law journal. Lexington. 2017. Vol. 18. No. 5. P. 1069 - 1090.

10. Oñate T., Fernanda L., Francisco T. By the law of emphyteusis: defense of a useful limited right // Rev. Boliv. de Derecho. 2018. No. 25. P. 320 - 341.

11. Pienaar G. The effect of the original acquisition of ownership of immovable property on existing limited real rights // Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal. 2016. Vol. 18. No. 5. P. 1479 - 1505.

12. Ramaekers E. What is Property Law // Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2017. Vol. 37. P. 588 - 617.

13. Smith Henry E. Property Is Not Just a Bundle of Rights // Econ Journal Watch. 2011. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 279 - 291.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up