1. Almond G. A. Comparative Political Systems // Journal of Politics. 1956. No. 3. P. 391–409.
2. Austin J. Lectures on Jurisprudence or the Philosophy of Positive Law: in 2 vols. Vol. I. L., 1869. P. 89–90.
3. Bayley D. H. Social Control and Political Change. Princeton, 1985. P. 86, 128.
4. Blackburn S. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford, 2005. P. 331–332.
5. Drobyshevskiy S. A. From the Classic Dontrines of Politics and Law of the 20th century: Relevant Ideas of G. Jellinik and D. Easton. M., 2014. P. 93, 105.
6. Drobyshevskiy S. A. History of Political and Legal Doctrines: The Main Classic Ideas. M., 2018. P. 533, 543.
7. Easton D. A Framework for Political Analysis. Chicago, 1979. P. 24, 50, 97.
8. Easton D. An Approach to the Analysis of Politics // World Politics. 1957. No. 3. P. 383–400.
9. Easton D. Categories for the Systems Analysis of Politics. In: Varieties of Political Theory (David Easton ed.). New Jersey, 1966. P. 148.
10. Easton D. Political Science in the United States: Past and Present // International Political Science Review. 1985. No. 1. P. 133–152.
11. Finnis J. Natural Law and Natural Rights. M., 2012. P. 163, 348–349.
12. Hoebel E. A. The Law of Primitive Man: A Study in Comparative Legal Dynamics. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1954. P. 29–45, 139.
13. Huang P., Gao Y. Should Social Science and Jurisprudence Imitate Natural Science? // Modern China. 2015. No. 2. P.131–135.
14. Midlarsky M. I. The Disintegration of Political Systems. War and Revolution in Comparative Perspective. Columbia, 1986. P. 141–210.
15. Pound R. Ideal Element in Law. Indianapolis, 2002. P. 99, 111, 113.
16. Pound R. Social Control through Law. New Haven, 1942. P. 112–118, 133–134.
17. Tuori K. American Legal Realism and Anthropology // Law and Social Inquiry. 2017. No. 3. P. 804–829.