Prosecution of the accused as an autonomous investigation procedure: obvious relic of the past or a legal existing tool?

Occupation: Chief researcher of the Sector of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Criminology at Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Москва, Дубнинская 40А к1 144

Journal name

Gosudarstvo i pravo

Edition

Issue 3

Pages

61-69

Abstract

The article analyzes the prospects for the development of a procedural mechanism for bringing forward a criminal claim against a person, subject to resolution on the merits in the course of the trial.

By revealing the true historical reasons contributing to the rooting of the current procedure for bringing in as an accused in the Russian criminal process, the unreliability of the arguments expressed by scientists in support of the abolition or significant reform of this procedure, following the example of Germany and a number of other European states, has been proved. The conclusion is formulated about the possibility of a final resolution of the issues raised in the article, not otherwise than in the context of understanding the general concept of further improvement of the entire system of Russian pre-trial proceedings.

Keywords

inquiry, pre-trial proceedings; accusation, accused, preliminary investigation, indictment, involve-ment as an accused, criminal prosecution, criminal law claim, charge function

Received

02.12.2021

Publication date

29.03.2022

Number of characters

34061

Cite

GOST	Rossinskiy S. Prosecution of the accused as an autonomous investigation procedure: obvious relic of the past or a legal existing tool? // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2022. – Issue 3 C. 61-69 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S102694520019209-0-1 (circulation date: 04.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S102694520019209-0
MLA	Rossinskiy, Sergey B "Prosecution of the accused as an autonomous investigation procedure: obvious relic of the past or a legal existing tool?." Gosudarstvo i pravo 3 (2022):61-69. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520019209-0
APA	Rossinskiy S. (2022). Prosecution of the accused as an autonomous investigation procedure: obvious relic of the past or a legal existing tool?. Gosudarstvo i pravo (3), pp.61-69 DOI: 10.31857/S102694520019209-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 419

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gavrilov B. Ya. Modern problems of pre-trial proceedings and measures to resolve them // Russian investigator. 2013. No. 21. P. 10 (in Russ.).

2. Gavrilov B. Ya. XX years of the Russian criminal procedural law: does it correspond to the scientific views and requirements of the law enforcement officer // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2021. No. 6. P. 8 (in Russ.).

3. Galuzo V.N., Yakupov R. Kh. Criminal procedure: textbook. 7th ed., rev. M., 2013. P. 366 – 373 (in Russ.).

4. Derishev Yu. V. Criminal pre-trial proceedings: the concept of procedural and functional-legal structure: dissertation of a doctor of jurisprudence. Omsk, 2005. P. 267 (in Russ.).

5. Efremova N.P., Kalnitskiy V.V. Involvement as an accused: a training manual. Omsk, 2007. P. 6 (in Russ.).

6. Kalnitskiy V.V. Questions of theory and practice of criminal proceedings: selected works. Omsk, 2016. P. 129 (in Russ.).

7. Kovtun N.N. Formation of the public prosecution as an independent stage of criminal proceedings in Russia // Journal of Russian law. 2019. No. 9. P. 123 - 137 (in Russ.).

8. Konovalov S.G. The procedure for bringing as a defendant as a constitutional guarantee of human rights // Scientific works of the Russian Academy of Legal Sciences. M., 2019. P. 752–755 (in Russ.).

9. Course of criminal procedure / ed. by L.V. Golovko. 2nd ed., rev. M., 2017. P. 734 (in Russ.).

10. Naumov K.A. The essence and structure of pre-trial proceedings in the criminal process of Russia: dissertation of the candidate of legal sciences. Omsk, 2021. P. 137 (in Russ.).

11. Rossinskiy S.B. Pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case: a fresh look at old problems // Legal education and science. 2020. No. 8. P. 33 (in Russ.).

12. Rossinskiy S.B. Pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case: the essence and methods of collecting evidence. M., 2021. P. 18, 23, 24, 43 (in Russ.).

13. Rossinskiy S.B. What should a Russian investigator be like? (To the 25th anniversary of the Concept of judicial reform of the RSFSR) // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2016. No. 10. P. 95, 96, 100 (in Russ.).

14. Rossinskiy S.B. On the inadmissibility of “pilot” charges in pre-trial proceedings in a criminal case // Siberian legal herald. 2021. No. 4 (95). P. 121–128 (in Russ.).

15. Rossinskiy S.B. Legal conditions for the application of measures of criminal procedural restraint lead to haste and groundlessness of the accusation // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2018. No. 5. P. 30–36 (in Russ.).

16. Rossinskiy S.B. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: the embodiment of the “high” purpose of the criminal procedure form or a “memo” for illiterate law enforcers // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2021. No. 6. P. 42 (in Russ.).

17. Stelmakh V. Yu. Some problems of normative regulation of inquiry // Russian Justice. 2019. No. 4. P. 59 (in Russ.).

18. Sheifer S.A. Pre-trial proceedings in Russia: stages of development of the investigative, judicial and prosecutorial authorities. M., 2013. P. 131 (in Russ.).