All
 
|
 
 


Theory of state and law as a legal science
 
PIIS102694520016181-0-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520016181-0
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Viktor N. Kornev 
Occupation: Head of Vitruk Department of Constitutional Law of the Russian state University of justice
Affiliation: Russian state University of Justice
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 7
Pages7-21
Abstract

The article deals with the issues related to the criteria of scientific character of legal science in general and the theory of state and law in particular. It is proved that the components of legal science are dogmatic and non-dogmatic elements. In general, the author comes to the conclusion that the complex, integrative nature of law as an object of legal science determines the necessity of the existence and justification of an integrative approach to its research.

Keywordslegal science, theory of state and law, legal dogmatics, sociology of law, object, subject, verification, falsification, conceptualization, scientific paradigm, rule of law, principle of law, state-legal regularity
Received29.03.2021
Publication date12.08.2021
Number of characters57182
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 831

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Alekseev N.N. Fundamentals of the Philosophy of Law. SPb., 1999. P. 23 (in Russ.).

2. Alekseev S.S. Philosophy of Law. M., 1998. P. 34 (in Russ.).

3. Vetyutnev Yu. Yu. State-legal regularities (Introduction to the theory) / ed. by A. Ya. Ryzhenkov. Elista, 2006 (in Russ.).

4. Vetyutnev Yu. Yu. What is a state-legal regularity? // Law and Politics. 2005. No. 9 (in Russ.).

5. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical research // Languages as an image of the world. M., 2013. P. 288 (in Russ.).

6. Gobozov I.A. Structure of scientific knowledge // Theory and methodology of legal science: textbook for masters: in 2 parts / ed. by M.N. Marchenko. M., 2019. Part 1. P. 191 (in Russ.).

7. Ershov V.V. Regulation of legal relations. M., 2020 (in Russ.).

8. Zhukov V.N. Dogmatic method and myths of legal positivism // State and Law. 2018. No. 5. P. 45 - 51 (in Russ.).

9. Zhukov V.N. Legal science // Zhukov V.N. Philosophy of Law. Dictionary. 2nd ed., rev. and add. / ed. by and comp. V.N. Zhukov. M., 2021. P. 868 - 883 (in Russ.).

10. Zhukov V.N. Legal science as a branch of knowledge // Theory and methodology of legal science: textbook for masters: in 2 parts / ed. by M.N. Marchenko. M., 2019. Part 1. P. 211 - 247 (in Russ.).

11. Kapra F, Mattei U. Ecology of Law. On the way to a legal system in tune with nature and society / transl. from English. G. Karpov; under scientific ed. by R. Raskova. M.; SPb., 2021. P. 47 (in Russ.). 

12. Kistiakovsky B.A. Social Sciences and law: essays on the methodology of the social Sciences and General theory of law. M., 1916. P. 321 - 324 (in Russ.). 

13. Kornev V.N. Monistic and integrative (synthetic) theory of the justification of the nature of state and law // Russ. justice. 2017. No. 5 (33). P. 20 - 22 (in Russ.). 

14. Kornev V.N. General theory of law in the context of the main legal schools // Theory and methodology of legal science: textbook for masters: in 2 parts / ed. by M.N. Marchenko. M., 2019. Part 1. P. 289, 312, 313 (in Russ.).

15. Kornev V.N. Law as a linguistic phenomenon // State and Law. 2018. No. 6. P. 5 - 12 (in Russ.).

16. Kornev V.N. Problems of the theory of the state in the liberal legal thought of Russia in the second half of the XIX - early XX century: abstract ... Doctor of Law. M., 2006 (in Russ.).

17. Kotlyarevsky S.A. Power and law. The problem of the Rule of Law. M., 1915 (in Russ.).

18. Lazarev V.V., Lipen S.V. History and methodology of legal science: university. a course for undergraduates of legal universities / ed. by A.V. Kornev. M., 2016. P. 63, 209 (in Russ.).

19. Muromtsev S.A. What is the dogma of law? M., 1885 (in Russ.).

20. General theory of state and law: akad. course: in 3 vols / ed. by M.N. Marchenko. 4th ed., reprint. and additional. M., 2013. Vol. 1. P. 9, 15 (in Russ.).

21. Problems of the theory of state and law: textbook / ed. by V.M. Syrykh. M., 2008. P. 21 (the author of the chapter is N.A. Vlasenko) (in Russ.).

22. Standards of scientific and homo juridicus in the light of the Philosophy of Law: materials of the fifth and sixth philosophical readings in memory of academician V.S. Nersesyants / ed. by V.G. Grafsky. M., 2011 (in Russ.). 

23. Syrykh V.M. The logical foundation of the General theory of law: in 2 vols. M., 2000. Vol. 1. P. 40 (in Russ.). 

24. Thompson M. Philosophy of science / transl. from English A. Garkavy. M., 2003. P. 105, 147 - 154 (in Russ.).

25. Tomsinov V.A. The concept of legal science and its role in the development and functioning of law // Krotkova N.V. History and methodology of legal science ("Round Table" of the Department of theory of state and Law and political Science of the Faculty of Law at Lomonosov Moscow state University and the journal "State and Law") // State and Law. 2016. No. 4. P. 11 - 13 (in Russ.). 

26. Frege G. Logical and philosophical works. Novosibirsk, 2008. P. 28 (in Russ.).

27. Ehrlich O. The foundation of the Sociology of Law / transl. from German M.V. Antonov; ed. by V.G. Grafsky, Yu. I. Grevtsov. SPb., 2011. P. 69 (in Russ.).

28. Yashchenko A.S. The theory of federalism: the experience of the synthetic theory of law and the state. Yuryev, 1912. P. 183 (in Russ.).

29. Aarnio A. Paradigms in Legal Dogmatics // Theory of Legal Science. Proceedings of the Conference on Legal Theory and Philosophy of Science. Lund, Sweden, December 11–14, 1983. Dordrecht, 1983. P. 25–38.

30. Bernd R. Rechtsdogmatik und Rechtspolitik unter dem Einfluss des Richterrechts. Trier, 2003. S. 10, 11.

31. Bernd R., Fischer Ch., Birk A. Rechtstheorie mit Juristischer Methodenlehre. 10 uberarbeitete Auflage. München, 2018. S. 178, 191—196.

32. Frommel M. Ein Rechtstheoretiker zwischen allen Stullen // H. Heinrich, H. Franzki, K. Schmalz, M. Stjlles. Deutsche juristen judischer Herkunft. München, 1993. S. 631, 632; Kantorowicz H. The Definitionof Law. NY., 1980. P. 37.  

33. Hohfeld W.N. Fundamental Legal Conceptions. Yale, 1964. 

34. Jhering R. von Ist die Jurisprudenz eine Wissenschaft? Jherings Wiener Antrittvorlesung vom 16. Oktober 1868. Wallstein Verlag, 1868. S. 52, 92.

35. Jhering R. von Scherz und Ernst in Jurisprudenz - Eine Weinachtsgabe für das juristische Publikum, 13. Aufl. Leipzig, 1924, unverand. Nachdruck, 1964. S. 247 ff., 253. 

36. Kantorowicz H. Der Kampf um Rechtswissenschaft (unter dem Pseudonym Gnaeus Flavius). Heidelberg, 1906.

37. Kirchmann J. von Die Wertlosigkeit der Jurisprudenz als Wissenschaft (1848). Nachdruck, Freiburg, 1990. S. 14.

38. Larenz K. Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft. Vierte, erganzte Auflage. Springer – Verlag Berlin Heidelberg Gmbh, 1979. S. 165–171.

39. Mahlman M. Rechtsphilosophie und Rechtstheorie. 4. Aufl. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017. S. 388–395. 

40. Nawiasky H. Allgemeine Rechtslehre als System der Rechtlichen Grundbegriffe. Verlagsanstalt&Co. AG., Einsideln/Zurich/Koln, 1948. S. 7—11. 

41. Nelson L. Die Rechtswissenschaft ohne Recht. (1917), 2 Aufl. Gottingen, 1949 (Neudruck 2. Aufl. Hamburg, 1971). 

42. Peczenik A. Wartosc naukowa dogmatyki prawa. Praca z zakresu poruwnawczej metodologii nauki prawa. Wakladny uniwersytetu lagielonskiego. Krakow, 1966. S. 5.

43. Sadowski-Zirk M. Wprowadzenie do filozofii prawa. Warszawa, 2011. S. 90.

44. Stelmach J., Brozek B. Spor o metode we wspolszesnej filosofii prawa // Проблеми фiлософii права. 2004. Т. II. С. 163 - 176.

45. Wright von G.H. Explanation and Uderstanding. NY., 1977.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up