Trust in legal science in Russia: methodological and praxeological issues

The article examines the problem of trust in legal science in different historical epochs in Russia. The level of trust in it is directly related to the adequate reflection in its theoretical positions and practical recommendations of the interests and value orientations of the people, including the legitimate political elite. In the modern world, going through the era of globalism and turbulence, the idea of the inevitability of the loss of confidence in "national law" is supported. However, in Russia, for which its sovereignty is an indisputable value, the opposite tendency is strengthening in legal science, aimed at preserving the idea of a civil society, in which emerging conflicts are resolved with strict adherence to national legal procedures. The role of legal science, freed from pseudo-knowledge and delusions, in these conditions can hardly be overestimated

Keywords

trust, intelligentsia, legal ideology, legal law, legal procedures, revolution, Russia, legal science, legal education, public opinion, legal norms, legal values

Received

11.05.2021

Publication date

28.06.2021

Number of characters

36760

Cite

GOST	Ekimov A. Trust in legal science in Russia: methodological and praxeological issues // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2021. – Issue 6 C. 63-72 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S102694520015037-1-1 (circulation date: 25.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S102694520015037-1
MLA	Ekimov, Anisim "Trust in legal science in Russia: methodological and praxeological issues." Gosudarstvo i pravo 6 (2021):63-72. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520015037-1
APA	Ekimov A. (2021). Trust in legal science in Russia: methodological and praxeological issues. Gosudarstvo i pravo (6), pp.63-72 DOI: 10.31857/S102694520015037-1

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 652

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Anners E. History of European law. M., 1996. P. 160 (in Russ.).

2. Berman G.J. The Western tradition of law: the epoch of formation. M., 1998. P. 51, 55 (in Russ.).

3. Vedeneev Yu. A. The Discovery of jurisprudence: epochs and style. 2020. No. 11. P. 40 - 48. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520012535-9; 2021. No. 1. P. 43 - 53. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520013227-0 (in Russ.).

4. Milestones. From the depths. M., 1991. P. 436 (in Russ.).

5. Goethe I.V. Faust: a tragedy. M., 1982. P. 301 (in Russ.).

6. Gorban V.S. Jeringa legal doctrine and its interpretation. M., 2018. P. 217–219 (in Russ.).

7. David R. Major legal systems of today. M., 1988. P. 25 (in Russ.).

8. Digest of Justinian / transl. from Latin; res. ed. L.L. Kofanov. M., 2002. Vol. 1. P. 39 - 43, 83 (in Russ.).

9. Zhukov V.N. The state, law, and power: the philosophy and sociology. M., 2015. P. 139–294 (in Russ.).

10. Zhukov V.N. Jurisprudence as a science: return to the forgotten truths of the // State and Law. 2017. No. 9. P. 5 - 24 (in Russ.).

11. Kerimov D.A. Freedom, law and legality. M., 1960 (in Russ.).

12. Kerimova T.V. Risk Man. Social and philosophical problems. M., 2009 (in Russ.).

13. Knyazev G.A. A brief outline of the history of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. M; L., 1945. P. 16 (in Russ.).

14. Knyaz’kov S.A. How serfdom developed and how it fell: a historical essay. SPb., 1900. P. 53 (in Russ.).

15. Korkunov N.M. The history of the philosophy of Law: a manual for lectures. 6th ed. (no changes). SPb., 1915. P. 245 (in Russ.).

16. Krotkova N.V. The state and the revolution. To the 100th anniversary of the Great October (All-Russian scientific conference) // State and Law. 2017. No. 10. P. 27 - 54; No. 11. P. 5 - 31; No. 12. P. 5 - 27 (in Russ.).

17. Krotkova N.V. Journal "State and Law" - 85 years // State and Law. 2012. No. 4. P. 11 - 28 (in Russ.).

18. Krotkova N.V. History and methodology of legal science (The "Round Table" of the Department of theory of state and law and political science of the Faculty of Law of the Lomonosov Moscow state University and the journal "State and Law") // State and Law. 2016. No. 4. P. 5 - 31 (in Russ.).

19. Korkunov N.M. S.E. Desnitsky - the first Russian Professor of law. SPb., 1894. P. 31 (in Russ.).

20. Korkunov N.M. Collection of articles. SPb., 1898. P. 18 (in Russ.).

21. Marsilius of Padua. Defender of the law. Defenso-pacis. M., 2014 (in Russ.).

22. Polenov A. Ya. O serfdom of the peasants in Russia // Russian philosophy of the second half of the XVIII century: chrestomatiya / comp. B.V. Emelyanov. Sverdlovsk, 1990. P. 116 (in Russ.).

23. Rauschenbach B.V. Idle thoughts. Essays. Articles. Memoirs. M., 2003. P. 239 (in Russ.).

24. Savenkov A.N. Global crisis of modernity as a subject of Philosophy of Law // State and Law. 2019. No. 4. P. 5 - 19. DOI: 10.31857/S01320769000-4632-7 (in Russ.).

25. Sapun V.A., Turbova Ya. V. The level of trust in the law and the modern Russian Constitution // The world of politics and sociology. 2014. No. 10 (in Russ.).

26. Solov'ev S.M. History of Russia since ancient times. M., 1965. Book 14. P. 98 - 100 (in Russ.).

27. Sorokin P. Dalnyaya doroga. Autobiography. M., 1992. P. 222, 244 (in Russ.).

28. Strogovich M.S. Basic questions of Soviet socialist legality. M., 1966. P. 241 (in Russ.).

29. Tarasov B. Yu. Russia fortress. M., 2011 (in Russ.).

30. Tolstoy L.N. A letter to the student on the law // Tolstoy L.N. Complete works. M., 1936. Vol. 38. P. 45–65 (in Russ.).

31. Tomsinov V.A. History of Russian jurisprudence. X–XVII centuries: textbook. M., 2017. P. 18, 19 (in Russ.).

32. Firsov N.N. Pugachevshchina: the experience of socio-psychological characteristics. 2nd ed. M., 1921. P. 23, 24 (in Russ.).

33. Shakhray S.M. Constitutional traps of history: was the revolution of 1917 inevitable? // Legal science: history and modernity. 2017. No. 5. P. 17 (in Russ.).