Philosophy and its lesson for modern jurisprudence

The article attempts to find the key lesson that philosophy presents to law in the modern era, and answers to questions about what is new in this lesson or at the current historical stage, philosophy and law, as spheres of knowledge, follow in a transitive order. The study reveals that under the weight of experience, the philosophy has gained understanding of the true scale of the phenomenon "knowledge" today signals the Sciences that the subjects of monitoring has changed significantly. Philosophy realized that it significantly underestimated knowledge, and the term dedicated to it does not reflect its real meaning, defining knowledge only as the result of knowing something. With this in mind, today brings the philosophy of science, including jurisprudence, to knowledge. Moreover, philosophy declares and justifies that knowledge is a new form of being. This was the reason for the present study and testing of the hypothesis that knowledge is a form of law

Keywords

law, Philosophy of Law, epistemology of law, epistemology of law, Philosophy of Criminal Law, knowledge, criminal law knowledge, form of being, form of law, feeling, will

Received

15.02.2021

Publication date

29.04.2021

Number of characters

43803

Cite

GOST	Bochkarev S. Philosophy and its lesson for modern jurisprudence // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2021. – Issue 4 C. 59-69 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S102694520014350-6-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014350-6
MLA	Bochkarev, Sergey A "Philosophy and its lesson for modern jurisprudence." Gosudarstvo i pravo 4 (2021):59-69. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014350-6
APA	Bochkarev S. (2021). Philosophy and its lesson for modern jurisprudence. Gosudarstvo i pravo (4), pp.59-69 DOI: 10.31857/S102694520014350-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 591

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Hegel G. Philosophy of Law. M., 2000. P. 67 (in Russ.).

2. Hegel G. Encyclopedia of Philosophical Sciences. M., 1974. Vol. 1. The Science of Logic. P. 114 (in Russ.).

3. Gribanov D.V. The sense of law // Jurisprudence. 2010. No. 3 (290). P. 254 (in Russ.).

4. Greene R. Laws of power / transl. from English J.E. Migunova. M., 2009. P. 423–425 (in Russ.).

5. Kant I. Critique of pure reason / transl. from German N.O. Lossky. M., 2015 (in Russ.).

6. Kasavin I.T. Space: the existential basis of knowledge // Epistemology and Philosophy of science. Vol. XVIII. No. 4. P. 14 (in Russ.).

7. Kerimov D.A. Selected works: in 3 vols. M., 2007. Vol. 2. P. 224, 228, 229 (in Russ.).

8. Kudryavtsev V.N. Selected works on social sciences: in 3 vols. 2002. Vol. 1. P. 12, 237 (in Russ.).

9. Lisitsyn-Svetlanov A.G. Philosophy of Law: the classic ideas and challenges // The transformation of the paradigm of law in civilization human development: report of the members of the Academy / under the General editorship of A.N. Savenkov. M., 2019. P. 153 - 164 (in Russ.).

10. Makarov V.L. Knowledge Economy: lessons for Russia // Herald of the RAS. 2003. Vol. 73. No. 5. P. 450 (in Russ.).

11. Maltsev G.V. Social foundations of law. M., 2013. P. 203 (in Russ.).

12. Nersesyants V.S. "The enemy" – a self-portrait of the society // Platon. 2014. No. 4. P. 51, 52 (in Russ.).

13. Savenkov A.N. Philosophy of Law, legal thinking and global problems of modern civilization // Transformation of the paradigm of law in the civilizational development of mankind: reports of members of the Russian Academy of Sciences: reports of members of the Russian Academy of Sciences / under the general editorship of A.N. Savenkov. M., 2019. P. 9–93 (in Russ.).

14. Sartre J.-P. Problems of the method. Articles / transl. from French V.P. Gaidamak. M., 2008. P. 13 (in Russ.).

15. Solov'ev V. The philosophical beginning of integral knowledge. Mn., 1999. P. 187 (in Russ.).

16. Sorokin V.V. Will and law: actualization of the problem // Historical and legal problems: a new perspective. 2012. No. 5. P. 258 (in Russ.).

17. Toshchenko Zh. T. New trends in the development of Russian sociology // Sociological research. 2013. No. 4 (348). P. 3 - 13 (in Russ.).

18. Trubetskoy E.N. Works on the Philosophy of Law / introductory article, comp. and note by I.I. Evlampiev. SPb., 2001. P. 381 (in Russ.).

19. Ferri E. Criminal sociology. M., 1908. P. 296 (in Russ.).

20. Shibutani T. Social psychology. M., 1969. P. 15 (in Russ.).

21. Schopenhauer A. Collected works: in 6 vols. Vol. 1: World as will and representation / transl. from German; under the General editorship of A. Chanyshev. M., 1999 (in Russ.).

22. Shultz V.L. Sociology of knowledge: history and methodology. M., 2006 (in Russ.).

23. Engle E. Ontology, Epistemology, Axiology: Bases for a Comprehensive Theory of Law (September 15, 2008) // Appalachian Journal of Law. Vol. 8. P. 103 - 122, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1268528

24. Jhering R. Geist des römischen Rechts. 1906. T. III. S. 338.

25. Schlag P. The Knowledge Bubble — Something Amiss in Expertopia (December 14, 2016). Forthcoming, Justin Desautels-Stein and Christopher Tomlins (editors), In Search of Contemporary Legal Thought, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2741144 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2741144