About the patent system in foreign countries and in Russia (historical and legal aspect)

 
PIIS102694520014150-6-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520014150-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Expert Coordinator of the State Duma Committee on information policy, information technologies and communication
Affiliation: State Duma Committee on information policy, information technologies and communication
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 3
Pages122-130
Abstract

Problems in the field of patenting have arisen since the issuance of the first patents even before the adoption of patent legislation. The discussion of the patent issue has received a new impetus in connection with the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) and the vaccine being developed against it. The article describes the essence of the patent system. The first court case of 1602, adopted in England against monopolies even before the adoption of the first legislative act on patents (the statute "On monopolies" of 1623), is presented. The author has discovered the origins of such patent law institutions as the inventive level (non-obviousness, inventive step), compulsory licenses and utility models.

Keywordscancellation of patent protection, legalized piracy, patent trolling, abuse of patent rights, antitrust law, compulsory licenses, the requirement of the inventive step (inventive step, non-obviousness), freedom of trade, public interests, the public good industrial revolution, industrial recovery, stimulating innovation
Received23.03.2020
Publication date23.03.2021
Number of characters32839
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 867

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Afanasyev D.V. Basic principles of patent law and their genesis. The first patents, the first patent laws and the first criticism of patents // Economy and Law. 2020. No. 6 (in Russ.).

2. Afanasyev D.V. The fine line between the patentable and the non-patentable in the legislation of foreign countries and Russia: discoveries, computer programs, biotechnologies, methods of treatment and other // Economy and Law. 2020. No. 2 (517). P. 73 - 96 (in Russ.).

3. Pilenko A.A. The right of the inventor. 3rd ed. M., 2013. P. 185 (in Russ.).

4. Pobedonostsev K. Course of Civil Law. SPb., 1896. Vol. 1. P. 676, 677 (in Russ.).

5. Siemens E.V. von. Personal memories / transl. from the German. V. Chumakov. M., 2010 (in Russ.).

6. Babbage Ch. Reflections on the Decline of Science in England and Some of its Causes (1830). London, 1830. P. 141.

7. Bagchi A. Compulsory Licensing and the Duty of Good Faith in TRIPS // Stanford Law Review. 2003. Vol. 55. No. 5. P. 1529 - 1555.

8. Brewster D. Decline of Science in England // Quarterly Review 43 (October 1830). P. 333.

9. Doorman G. Patent Law in Netherlands. Part I // Journal of the Patent Office Society. 1948. Vol. 30. No. 3. P. 212, 236.

10. Doorman G. Patents for Inventions in the Netherlands during the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries. Martinus Nijnoff. 1942.

11. Dutton H. The patent system and inventive activity during the industrial revolution 1750 - 1852. Manchester University Press. 1984. P. 5, 6.

12. Kuznets S.S. Modern Economic Growth: Finding and Reflection // The American Economic Review. 1973. V. 63 (3). P. 247.

13. Machlup F., Penrose E. The Patent Controversy in the Nineteenth Century // Journal of Economic History. 1950. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 1 - 29.

14. Miller S. The Case of the Monopolies: Some of Its Results and Suggestions // Michigan Law Review. 1907. Vol. 6. No. 1. P. 1 - 24.

15. Schiff E. Industrialization Without National Patents: The Netherlands, 1869 - 1912; Switzerland, 1850 - 1907. Princeton Legacy Library. 1971.

16. Pooling of Patents: Hearings Before the Committee on Patents, House of Representatives, Seventy-fourth Congress, a Bill Providing for the Recording of Patent Pooling Agreements and Contracts with the Commissioner of Patents, 1935. U.S. Government Printing Office, 1936.

17. Stieglitz J. Give Prizes not Patents // New Scientists. September. 2006. P. 21.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up