On unity and differentiation of legal science in the Russian Federation

The problem of understanding the unity and differentiation of legal science is one of the urgent problems facing jurisprudence. The relevance of this problem is due to the fact that the main object of the study of legal science is law, the raison d’être of which is that it is designed to regulate social relations. The purpose of the work is to study the features of legal science as a social phenomenon and to determine its features. Logical research methods were used as research methods: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, abstraction, generalization, systems approach. In the course of the study, it was found that legal science is a specific area of human knowledge, the subject of which is the regularities of the formation, development and functioning of legal systems, their components and elements, which can be classified depending on the level of generalization into general, sectoral and institutional.

Keywords

jurisprudence, science, patterns, legal regulation, unity, differentiation, ontology, epistemology, interdisciplinary approach, legal research

Received

19.02.2021

Publication date

20.06.2022

Number of characters

24619

Cite

GOST
MLA	Осипов, Михаил "On unity and differentiation of legal science in the Russian Federation." Gosudarstvo i pravo 6 (2022):48-56. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520013929-2
APA	Осипов М. (2022). On unity and differentiation of legal science in the Russian Federation. Gosudarstvo i pravo (6), pp.48-56 DOI: 10.31857/S102694520013929-2

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 412

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avrutin Yu. E. On the issue of the passport of the nomenclature of specialties of researchers // Legal education and science. 2015. No. 4. P. 30 (in Russ.).

2. Baytin M.I. The essence of law (modern normative legal understanding on the verge of two centuries). M., 2005. P. 227 (in Russ.).

3. Vasilevskaya L. Yu. On the subject of legal science // Russ. legal journal. 2017. No. 1. P. 34, 35 (in Russ.).

4. Vedenev Yu. A. Legal science: system and structure // Citizen. Elections. Power. 2016. No. 2 - 3. P. 21 -43 (in Russ.).

5. Zhukov V.N. Anthropology of Law // Zhukov V.N. Philosophy of Law. Dictionary. 2nd ed., rev. and add. / ed. and comp. V.N. Zhukov. M., 2021. P. 26 - 33 (in Russ.).

6. Zhukov V.N. State, law, power: philosophy and sociology. M., 2015 (in Russ.).

7. Zhukov V.N. General theory of law // Zhukov V.N. Philosophy of Law. Dictionary. 2nd ed., rev. and add. / ed. and comp. V.N. Zhukov. P. 458 - 464. M., 2021 (in Russ.).

8. Zhukov V.N. Philosophy of Law. Dictionary. 2nd ed., rev. and add. / ed. and comp. V.N. Zhukov. M., 2021 (in Russ.).

9. Zhukov V.N. Philosophy of Law: textbook for universities. M., 2019 (in Russ.).

10. Zhukov V.N. Legal science // Zhukov V.N. Philosophy of Law. Dictionary. 2nd ed., rev. and add. / ed. and comp. V.N. Zhukov. M., 2021. P. 868 - 883 (in Russ.).

11. Zhukov V.N. Jurisprudence as a science: return to forgotten truths // State and Law. 2017. No. 9. P. 5 - 24 (in Russ.).

12. Zavyalov Yu. S., Galkin I.V. Phenomenology and cognition of law // General theory of law: history and current state (to the 110th anniversary of A.I. Denisov) / ed. by M.N. Marchenko. M., 2018. P. 297 - 316 (in Russ.).

13. Jorgensen Marianne V., Philips Louise J. Discourse analysis. Theory and method / transд. from English. 2nd ed., corrected. Kharkov, 2008 (in Russ.).

14. Krotkova N.V. History and methodology of legal science (“Round Table” of the Department of Theory of State and Law and Political Science of the Faculty of Law of Lomonosov Moscow State University and the journal “State and Law”) // State and Law. 2016. No. 4. P. 5 - 31 (in Russ.).

15. Krotkova N.V. General theory of Law: history and current state. To the 110th anniversary of the birth of A.I. Denisov (1906 - 1984) // State and Law. 2017. No. 4 (in Russ.).

16. Kudryavtsev V.N., Nikitinsky V.I., Samoshchenko I.S., Glazyrin V.V. Effectiveness of legal norms. M., 1980 (in Russ.).

17. Lafitskiy V.I. Legal science: history and modernity // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Jurisprudence. 2010. No. 3 (22). P. 26 - 29 (in Russ.).

18. Maltsev G.V. Understanding of law. Approaches and problems. M., 1999 (in Russ.).

19. Maltsev G.V. Social foundations of law. M., 2007 (in Russ.).

20. Marx K., Engels F. Manifesto of the Communist Party. M., 1989 (in Russ.).

21. Interdisciplinarity in sciences and philosophy / ed. I.T. Kasavin. M., 2010 (in Russ.).

22. Petrazhitsky L.I. Theory of law and the state in connection with the theory of morality: in 2 parts. M., 2018. Part 1 (in Russ.).

23. Polyakov A.V. The communicative concept of law: problems of genesis and theoretical and legal justification: dis. ... Doctpr of Law in the form of a scientific report. SPb., 2002 (in Russ.).

24. Ponomareva E.V. Subjects and quasi-subjects of law: theoretical and legal problems of differentiation: abstract ... PhD in Law. Ekaterinburg, 2019. P. 10 (in Russ.).

25. Pukhta G.F. Encyclopedia of Law / transl. from the 6th ed. ed. by P. Karasevich, a student of the Demidov Law Lyceum Linderbraten. Yaroslavl, 1872 (in Russ.).

26. Sinitsyn S.A. Contract: new facets of legal regulation and issues of legal understanding // Journal of Russian law. 2019. No. 1. P. 45 - 61. DOI: 10.12737/art_2019_1_5 (in Russ.).

27. Sitnikova M.P. Criminological characteristics of the criminal's personality in the sphere of extremist activity of youth // Russ. legal journal. 2018. No. 1. P. 84 - 92 (in Russ.).

28. Solovyov V.S. Justification of good / res. ed. O.A. Platonov. M., 2012 (in Russ.).

29. Spiridonov L.I. Philosophy of Law // Jurisprudence. 2009. No. 5. P. 213 - 227 (in Russ.).

30. Sukhodolskaya Yu. V. Subculturization of mass murder in educational organizations as a new Russian criminological phenomenon // Legality. 2020. No. 10. P. 37 - 40 (in Russ.).

31. Syrykh V.M. Logical foundations of the General theory of law. Elementary composition. M., 2004. P. 185, 186 (in Russ.).

32. Uvarov A.A. On the typology of legal understanding in decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation // Constitutional and Municipal Law. 2019. No. 5. P. 55 - 59 (in Russ.).

33. Chestnov I.L. Socio-cultural Anthropology of Law as a postclassical research program // Russ. journal of Legal Studies. 2014. No. 4 (1). P. 77 - 84 (in Russ.).

34. Shishkin V.V. Synergetic approach in the theory of law: abstract ... PhD in Law. N. Novgorod, 2007 (in Russ.).

35. Ekimov A.I. Trust in legal science in Russia: methodological and praxeological problems // State and Law. 2021. No. 6. P. 63 - 72. DOI: 10.31857/S102694520015037-1 (in Russ.).

36. Erlikh O. The foundation of the Sociology of Law / transl. from German by M.V. Antonov; ed. by V.G. Grafsky, Yu. I. Grevtsov. SPb., 2011 (in Russ.).

37. Adisa W.B., Alabi T.A. An empirical investigation of court users’ encounters with bribery, judicial extortion and corruption victimisation in Lagos State. Crime Law Soc Change 75, 141–163 (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s10611-020-09931-0

38. Advancing Interdisciplinary Approaches to International Relations / S.A. Yeti, P. James (eds.). Springer, 2017. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-40823-1

39. Black Donald (1983). Crime as Social Control. American Sociological Review. 48. 34. DOI: 10.2307/2095143

40. Cohen F. Transcendental nonsense and the functional approach // Columbia Law Review. 1935. No. 35. P. 809–849.

41. Eristavi K. Performing Defiance with Rights. Law Critique (2020). DOI: 10.1007/s10978-020-09277-5

42. Ferreira M.A. Feltran G. (2020). The Entangled City: Crime as Urban Fabric in Sao Paulo. Crime Law Soc Change (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s10611-021-09937-2

43. Galanis M. Corporate Law Versus Social Autonomy: Law as Social Hazard. Law Critique 32, 1–32 (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s10978-020-09267-7

44. Hägerström A. Der römische Obligationsbegriff im Lichte der Allgemeinen römischen Rechtsanschauung. Uppsala, 1941. Vol. II. Appendix.

45. Interdisciplinary Studies. In: Michalos A.C. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. 2014. Springer, 2019. DOI 0.1007/978-3-030-18659-3

46. Llewellyn K. Some realism about realism: responding to Dean Pound // Harward Law Review. 1931. No. 1. P. 222 - 264.

47. McGrath J. Self-deception as a technique of neutralization: an analysis of the subjective account of a white-collar criminal. Crime Law Soc Change (2021). DOI: 10.1007/s10611-021-09933-6

48. Meng Yusheng. Favour and Power in the Acquaintance Society: Interpreting a Conflict in White Deer Plain, International Journal of Law and Society. 2021. Vol. 4. No. 1. P. 23 - 27. DOI: 10.11648/j.ijls.20210401.13

49. Steric I. Generic. Jug end und Religion. Bestandsaufnahmen, Analyses und Fallstudten zur Re g csitat Jugendlktfier. VVeinheim & München, 2011.

Anti-plagiarism check report (Отчет_о_проверке_статьи_новый.pdf, 794 Kb) [Download]