Number of purchasers: 0, views: 597
Readers community rating: votes 0
1. Alexy R. The concept and reality of law (reply to legal positivism) / transl. from German A.N. Laptev, F. Kalshoyer; scientific. ed. by T.F. Yakovleva. M., 2011. P. 16. 103 (in Russ.).
2. Basu D.D. Constitutional Law of India. M., 1986. P. 245, 246 (in Russ.).
3. Belov S.A. Whether rational discourse to justify the value choice in law // Jurisprudence. 2014. No. 5 (316). P. 232 (in Russ.).
4. Leontiev D.A. Values of society and values of the individual. Thesis of reports. URL: http://iphras.ru/page52169422.htm (in Russ.).
5. Sivitsky V.A. Balance of constitutional values as a subject and method of activity of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation // Compromise in law: theory, practice, technique: collection of articles based on the materials of the international scientific and practical conference (Nizhny Novgorod, May 29 - 30, 2014). N. Novgorod, 2014. Vol. 2. P. 290 - 299 (in Russ.).
6. Khorunzhiy S.N. Constitutional ideology of the balance of constitutional values // Legal epistemology. 2016. No. 3. P. 78–85 (in Russ.).
7. Shugurov M.V. Balance and disbalance as categories of legal reality: system-synergetic approach // Russ. journal of legal research. 2016. No. 1(6). P. 88 (in Russ.).
8. Aleinikoff T.A. Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing, 96 Yale L.J. (1987). P. 945, 948, 949. URL: http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol96/iss5/1
9. Alexy R. Balancing, constitutional review, and representation // International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 3. Issue 4. 1 October 2005. P. 573, 575. URL: https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/3/4/572/792008
10. Alexy R. Proportionality, constitutional law, and sub-constitutional law: A reply to Aharon Barak // International Journal of Constitutional Law. Vol. 16. Issue 3. 9 November 2018. P. 871–879.
11. Antieau Chester James. The Jurisprudence of Interests as a Method of Constitutional Adjudication, 27 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 823 (1977). URL: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol27/iss4/10
12. Barak Aharon. Proportionality: Constitutional Rights and their Limitations (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law). Cambridge, 2012. P. 340–349.
13. Benvindo J.Z. Balancing Within the Context of German Constitutionalism: The Bundesverfassungsgericht’s Shift to Activism / chapter from: On the limits of constitutional adjudication: Deconstructing balancing and judicial activism. 2010. P. 31–81.
14. Dickinson J. The Law behind the Law // Columbia Law Review. 1929. No. 3. P. 296 - 315.
15. Faigman David L. Madisonian Balancing: A Theory of Constitutional Adjudication, 88 Nw. U. L. Rev. 641. 1994. URL: http://repository.uchastings.edu/faculty_scholarship/870.
16. Gunther G. Constitutional Law. 11th ed. 1985. P. 130.
17. Haines C.G. The American Doctrine of Judicial Supremacy. 2d ed. 1932; Boudin Louis B. Government by Judiciary, 2 vols. New York, 1932.
18. Kommers Donald P. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Duke University Press, 1997. P. 315 - 318.
19. Laurent B. Frantz. Is the First Amendment Law? A Reply to Professor Mendelson // 51 CALIF. L. REV. 729, 748 (1963).
20. Paradoxes of Legal Science by Benjamin N. Cardozo: Review / by Rousseau A. Burch // Michigan Law Review. Vol. 27. No. 6 (Apr., 1929). P. 637 - 649.
21. Pound R. Discretion, Dispensation and Mitigation: The Problem of the individual special case // 35 N.Y. University Law Review. 925 (1960). P. 925.
22. Ryssdal R. Opinion: The Coming Age of the European Convention on Human Rights // EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW. 1996. P. 26.
23. Scanlan Alfred L. The Passing of Justice Murphy-The Conscience of a Court // 25 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 7, 38 (1949).
24. Stevens John Paul. Judicial Activism: Ensuring the Powers and Freedoms Conceived by the Framers for Today's World // C.B.A. REC., Oct. 16, 2002, at 26.
25. Stone H.F. The Common Law in the United States, 50 HARV. L. REV. 4, 10 (1936). P. 20.
26. Urbina, Francisco J. A Critique of Proportionality and Balancing. Cambridge, 2017.
27. Veel Paul-Erik N. Incommensurability, Proportionality, and Rational Legal Decision-Making // Law and Ethics of Human Rights. Is. 4 (2), 2010. P. 178 - 228.