All
 
|
 
 


The integration Essence of the modern Law and its comparative potential
 
PIIS102694520013040-5-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520013040-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Aleksey Egorov 
Occupation: Rector of the Belarusian State University of Economics; Member of the Standing Commission on Law of the House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus
Affiliation:
Belarusian State University of Economics
The House of Representatives of the National Assembly of the Republic of Belarus
Address: Republic of Belarus, Minsk
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 10
Pages31-41
Abstract

The article is devoted to the analysis of “comparative law” as a meta-theory of legal comparative formed within the framework of General theoretical legal science. The doctrine of legal comparison finds its expression in comparative law, while comparative jurisprudence is the empirical basis for the formation of comparative legal science (legal comparative). The author distinguishes between descriptive comparative jurisprudence and the doctrine of comparative legal science presented in the form of comparative law.

Through the prism of the distinction between scientific and educational components of comparative legal science, the issues of the characteristics of modern law as a product of the integration of legal systems and their national components are highlighted. The features of law (normativity, formal certainty, state guarantee, etc.) studied in the course of General theory of law are analyzed using a comparative approach and from the standpoint of an independent component of legal comparative studies - comparative law.

Keywordscomparative law, legal comparison, legal family, legal system, legal integration, legal experience, the essence of law, law enforcement, lawmaking, legal reception
Received16.03.2022
Publication date24.11.2022
Number of characters40296
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 310

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Anisimov A.P., Melnichenko R.G. Judicial precedent: from theory to practice // Russ. judge. 2009. No. 3 (in Russ.).
2. Aniskov I., Maltsev V. The language of law. M., 1990 (in Russ.).
3. Babaev V.K. Formal certainty and possibilities of formalization of legislation // Soviet State and Law. 1978. No. 4. P. 47 (in Russ.).
4. Bogdanovskaya I. Yu. Case law. M., 1993 (in Russ.).
5. Borulenkov Yu. P. Legal thinking as an intellectual component of legal cognition // Jurisprudence. 2017. No. 2 (in Russ.).
6. Vasilevich G.A. Judicial precedent as a source of law // Justice of Belarus. 2004. No. 7 (in Russ.).
7. Gryazin I. Text of the law. Experience of methodological analysis of competing theories. Tallinn, 1983 (in Russ.).
8. Guk P.A. Judicial precedent: theory and practice. M., 2009 (in Russ.).
9. David R., Joffre-Spinosi K. Basic legal systems of modernity / transl. from French by V.A. Tumanov. M., 1997. P. 70 (in Russ.).
10. David R., Joffre-Spinosi K. Basic legal systems of modernity / transl. from French and the introductory article by V.A. Tumanov.  M., 1988. P. 308 - 376 (in Russ.).
11. Dubovitsky V.N., Ivanova T.V. Judicial practice as a source of law in the Republic of Belarus // Herald of Yanka Kupala Grodno State University. Ser. 4. Jurisprudence. 2009 (in Russ.).
12. Egorov A.V. Sources of law in foreign legal systems (comparative analysis of Romano-Germanic and Anglo-Saxon legal traditions) // Herald of Yanka Kupala Grodno State University. Ser. 4. Jurisprudence. 2008. No. 2. P. 107 - 113 (in Russ.).
13. Egorov A.V. Law enforcement technology in comparative legal studies // Herald of Yanka Kupala Grodno State University. Ser. 4. Jurisprudence. 2013. No. 2 (in Russ.).
14. Egorov A.V. Legal thinking and its types (comparative analysis) // Herald of the Polotsk State University. Ser. D. Economic and Legal Sciences. 2004. No. 2 (in Russ.).
15. Sources of law / res. ed. V.P. Kazimirchuk. M., 1981 (in Russ.).
16. Krasheninnikova N.A. Hindu law: history and modernity. M., 1982 (in Russ.).
17. Kross R. Precedent in English law. M., 1985 (in Russ.).
18. Kutarev O. Yu. Does legal geography have the right to life? // Sociosphere. 2012. No. 1 (in Russ.).
19. Leist O.E. The essence of law. Problems of theory and Philosophy of Law. M., 2002. P. 70 (in Russ.).
20. Marchenko M.N. Sources of law. M., 2005 (in Russ.).
21. Marchenko M.N. Legal systems of the modern world. M., 2001 (in Russ.).
22. Marchenko M.N., Deryabina E.M. Theory of state and law of Russia: in 2 vols. M., 2019. P. 44 (in Russ.).
23. Muromtsev G., Supataev M.A. Customary law in the countries of East Africa. M., 1984 (in Russ.).
24. Nesterova Yu. S. Judicial precedent: theory and practice // Vectors of development of modern Russia. M., 2010 (in Russ.).
25. General theory of state and law: akadem. course: in 2 vols. Vol. 1. Theory of law. M., 1998. P. 15 (in Russ.).
26. Saidov A.H. Comparative jurisprudence and legal geography of the world. M., 1993 (in Russ.).
27. Syukiyainen L.R. Muslim Law. Questions of theory and practice. M., 1986 (in Russ.).
28. Tikhomirov Yu. A. New vectors of regulation – “other” law? // Journal of Russ. law. 2016. No. 4. P. 6, 7 (in Russ.).
29. Legal technique. Special issue. Legal technique in the system of university training of lawyers: scientific and methodological support and didactic ways of its improvement. N. Novgorod, 2009 (in Russ.).
30. Criminal Law. A Criminal Code for England and Wales. Vol. 1. Report and Draft Criminal Code Bill. London, 1989.
31. Davis D. The Spirit of Hindu Law. Cambridge, 2010.
32. Gans E. Das Erbrecht in Weltgeschichticher Entwicklung. Eine Abhandlungder Universalgeschichte. Berlin, Tűbingen. B. 1–4. 1824–1835.
33. Hage J., Walterman A., Akkermans B. Introduction to Law. Maastricht, 2014. P. 2.
34. Joubert W. A. The Law of South Africa. Durban, 1993.
35. Kamali M. H. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. Cambridge, 1991.
36. Landes W., Posner, R. Legal Precedent: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis // Journal of Law and Economics. 1976. Vol. 19 (2). P. 249–307.
37. Marry A. G. The Sources of law in a changing legal order // Creighton Law Revier. 1983. Vol. 17. P. 663–698.
38. Philippe J. Les sources du droit. Dalloz, 2005.
39. Roguin E. Traité de droit civil compare: Les successions. Paris, 1904–1912.
40. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford, 2008. P. 4–31.
41. Wigmore J. H. A panorama of the world’s Legal Systems. 1928. Vol. 1–3.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up