All
 
|
 
 


Criminal punishment and digital technology: bifurcation point
 
PIIS102694520010658-4-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520010658-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Evgeny Russkevich 
Occupation: Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal Law
Affiliation: Kikot Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia
Address: Moscow, Russia
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 7
Pages77-84
Abstract

The article substantiates the significance of the scientific study of the issues of the transforming influence of information and communication technologies on criminal punishment. Based on the analysis of objective data, a probabilistic prediction of the evolution of this criminal law institution in the digital reality is formulated. It is stated that the introduction of modern information and communication technologies with elements of artificial intelligence to monitor the execution of the types of punishment used will contribute to the objectivity of supervision of prisoners, reduce corruption risks, save budget funds, and prevent the de-socialization of convicts. It is substantiated that in the conditions of intensive digitalization of life and, as a result, crime, the domestic punishment system must be supplemented with a special punishment, which consists in restricting the right of a convicted person to a digital presence on the Internet. The paper draws a conclusion (forecast) about the possible introduction of a digital public safety rating in the Russian Federation and the addition of a new type of punishment to criminal law – a reduction in the public reliability rating.

KeywordsCriminal Law, criminal punishment, digital technologies, digitalization, cybercrime, computer crime
Received16.05.2019
Publication date07.08.2020
Number of characters27664
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 801

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Babaev M.M., Pudovochkin Yu. E. Problems of the Russian criminal policy. M., 2014 (in Russ.).
2. Zhesterov P.V. The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Transformation of the Content of Criminal Repression // Criminal Law: Development Strategy in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the XV International Scientific Practical Conference. M., 2018.  P. 625, 626 (in Russ.).
3. Knapp V. On the possibility of using cybernetic methods in law. M., 1965 (in Russ.).
4. The course of the Soviet criminal law (Part General). Vol. 1 / ed. N.A. Belyaev, M.D. Shargorodsky.  L., 1968 (in Russ.).
5. Savenkov A.N. Counteraction of cybercrime in the financial and credit sphere as a vector of ensuring global security // State and Law. 2017. No. 10. P. 5–18 (in Russ.).
6. Talapina E.V. Law and Digitalization: Challenges and Perspectives // Journal of Russ. Law. 2018. No. 2. P. 5–17 (in Russ.).
7. Tikhomirov Yu. A. The influence of digitalization on the competence of federal executive bodies // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2018. No. 12. P. 90–94 (in Russ.).
8. Khabrieva T. Ya. Law before the challenges of digital reality // Journal of Russ. law. 2018. No. 9. P. 5–16 (in Russ.).
9. Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution / transl. from English. M., 2018 (in Russ.).
10. Roache R. How Technology Could Make “Life in Prison” a Much Longer, Tougher Sentence // Slate. 2013. URL: https://slate.com/technology/2013/08/daniel-pelka-ariel-castro-how-life-extending-technology-could-make-a-life-sentence-tougher-and-longer.html   (дата обращения: 20.04.2019).
11. Smith R. Criminal forfeiture and restriction-of-use orders in sentencing high tech offenders // Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice. 2004. №. 286. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology. URL: https://aic.gov.au/publications/tandi/tandi286  (дата обращения: 12.02.2019).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up