Do the procedural forms of preliminary investigation meet the requirements of legal proceedings in the Russian Federation

 
PIIS013207690009238-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690009238-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Professor of Department of management bodies investigation of crimes Academy of the interior Ministry of the Russian Federation
Affiliation: Academy of the interior Ministry of the Russian Federation
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 4
Pages87-95
Abstract

The article analyzes the modern criminal procedure, confirms the trend of its constant development, which was reflected in the adoption of more than 250 Federal laws that make changes to it after the entry into force of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. At the same time, it is noted that the adoption of some of these Federal laws was due to compromise decisions during the preparation and adoption of the CPC of the Russian Federation. Among the problems of the current Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation that require further legislative improvement are the procedural terms of the investigation, the rules governing the procedure for bringing charges, the introduction of a protocol form of investigation, absentee detention, and a number of others.

KeywordsCriminal Procedure Code, stage of initiation of a criminal case, presentation of charges, differentiation of procedural powers, Prosecutor, head of the investigative body, head of the inquiry unit, remand in custody, protocol form of investigation
Received26.07.2019
Publication date11.06.2020
Number of characters30789
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 997

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Speech of the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Yu. Ya. Chayka at the parliamentary hearings in the Federation Council of the Russian Federation on November 18, 2013 on the topic "Criminal policy in the Russian Federation: problems and solutions". URL: http://www.genproc.gov.ru (accessed: 05.07.2019) (in Russ.).

2. Gavrilov B. Ya. Doctrine of pre-trial proceedings: present and future // Russ. justice. 2018. No. 1. P. 37 – 41 (in Russ.).

3. Gavrilov B. Ya. On increasing the role of the Prosecutor in criminal proceedings in the context of radically liberal trends in the development of legislation // Public and Private Law. 2019. No. 1. P. 137–146 (in Russ.).

4. Golovko L.V. Archetypes of pre-trial proceedings, possible prospects for the development of domestic preliminary investigation // Criminal proceedings. 2014. No. 2. P. 9–16 (in Russ.).

5. Doctrinal model of criminal procedural evidentiary law of the Russian Federation and comments on it / songwriters: A.S. Alexandrov et al., 2015 (in Russ.).

6. Makharinsky P.V. Practical guide for forensic investigators. SPb., 1907. P. 386 (in Russ.).

7. New theory of criminal procedural evidence: within the framework of the sixth "Babaevskih readings" // Herald of the Nizhny Novgorod legal Academy. 2015. No. 5 (in Russ.).

8. Problems of legislative support for the draft concept of criminal policy. URL: http://www.igpran.ru/nlive/4461/ (accessed: 05.07.2019) (in Russ.).

9. Modern problems of proof and decision-making in criminal proceedings. Social technologies and legal institutions: mater. International science-practice Conf., dedicated to the 95th anniversary of Prof. Polina A. Lupinskaya. M., 2016 (in Russ.).

10. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Belarus from 16.07.1999 No. 295-Z // National legal Internet portal of the Republic of Belarus. URL: http://www.pravo.by (accessed: 05.07.2019) (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up