The limits of law and paradoxes in the legal regulation

 
PIIS013207690008347-3-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690008347-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Lecturer of the Department of theory and history of law of the National Research University "Higher School of Economics"
Affiliation: National State University “Higher School of Economics”
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 1
Pages20-31
Abstract

The article deals with the historical development of concept of limits of law and its relation in connection with rational/irrational opposition. The paradoxical nature of the limit as such consists in the fact that it creates a freedom space and decease irrational forces and at the same time restricts this freedom and force the freedom to overcome the limit. There are two types of limits of law: moral (principled) limits and practical (instrumental) limits. The rational basis of these limits is analyzed in article. The moral limits of law identify deviations in the relations between individuals, society and the state, irrational approaches and decisions. The paradox of moral limits manifests itself in the form of dependence of freedom on the modern state. Practical (instrumental) limits arise in a case when law subdue to the goals and functions of other systems, and lost its autonomy. The necessity of critics of using of law as a means-to-ends is substantiated. Practical limits of law are manifested when regulation ignores the state of social system: the level of integration of social system or its stratification or the level of democracy. Paradoxes of regulation arise both in the object regulation and in the legal system itself. If legal regulation ignores the autonomy of law, rationality of legal system decreases. The signs of these are the practical limits of law and paradoxes of regulation.

Keywordslimits of law, legal system, paradoxes of legal regulation, effectiveness of law, functions of law, instrumentalization of law, rationality
Received24.04.2019
Publication date02.02.2020
Number of characters42985
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 1066

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Agamben D. Homo sacer. State of emergency. M., 2011. P. 8 (in Russ.).

2. Alexandrov N.G. Legal norm and legal relationship. M., 1947. P. 3 (in Russ.).

3. Aristotle. Metaphysics. M. - L., 1934. P. 98 (in Russ.).

4. Aristotle. Physics. M., 1937. P. 56 (in Russ.).

5. Aurobindo Sh. Collected works. Vol. 8. Fundamentals of Indian culture. SPb., 1998. P. 154, 155 (in Russ.).

6. Benvenist E. Dictionary of Indo-European social terms. M., 1995. P. 299 (in Russ.).

7. Weber M. Economy and society: essays in understanding sociology: in 4 vols. Vol. III. Law. M., 2018. P. 41, 42, 57, 58 (in Russ.).

8. Gaynutdinova L.A. Weakening of the state and civil society in the conditions of globalization // Political expertise: POLITEX. Vol. 6. 2010. No. 1. P. 245 (in Russ.).

9. Hegel G. Philosophy of Law. M., 1990. P. 147; 2007. P. 284 (in Russ.).

10. Gurvich G.D. Philosophy and Sociology of Law: elected. compositions. SPb., 2004. P. 75 - 78 (in Russ.).

11. Danilov Yu. A. Synergetics // In the book: Danilov Yu. A. The beautiful world of science: collection / comp. A.G. Shadrina; under the General ed. of V.I. Sanyuk, D.I. Trubetskoy. M., 2008. P. 210 (in Russ.).

12. Jouvenel B. de. Power: the natural history of its growth. M., 2010 (in Russ.).

13. Ilyenkov E.V. About "essence of the person" and "humanism" in understanding of Adam Shaff (about A. Shaff's book "Marxism and the human individual" [Electronic resource] - Access mode. URL: http://caute.ru/ilyenkov/texts/phc/schaff.html (accessed: 30.12.2017) (in Russ.).

14. Ilyushenko N.S. Category "border" as constitutive principle of individual self-consciousness // Philosophy. Policy. Culture: materials of the school of the young philosopher. M., 2010. P. 121 (in Russ.).

15. Ioffe O.S. Legal norms and human actions // Actual issues of Soviet Civil Law. M., 1964. P. 12 (in Russ.).

16. Isaev M.A. History of the Russian state and law. M., 2012. P. 675, 676 (in Russ.).

17. Kelsen G. The pure theory of law. SPb., 2015. P. 489 (in Russ.).

18. Cowes R. Firm, market and law. M., 2007. P. 164 (in Russ.).

19. Locke John. The experience of toleration // Locke John. Compositions: in 3 vols. M., 1988. P. 69 (in Russ.).

20. Maltsev G.V. Understanding of law: approaches and problems. M., 1999. P. 368 (in Russ.).

21. Maltsev G.V. The social foundations of law. M., 2007. P. 744, 745 (in Russ.).

22. Mill John. S. On freedom // In the book: On freedom. Anthology of world liberal thought (I half of the twentieth century). M., 2000. P. 295 (in Russ.).

23. Montesquieu S.L. On the spirit of laws. M., 1999. P. 56 (in Russ.).

24. Otto R. Sacred. SPb., 2008. P. 7, 8, 102 - 106 (in Russ.).

25. Polyakov A.V. Efficiency of legal regulation: a communicative approach // In book: The effectiveness of legal regulation / under the General ed. of A.V. Polyakov, V.V. Denisenko, M.A. Belyaeva. M., 2017. P. 12 (in Russ.).

26. Filippova S. Yu. communicative theory of law and an instrumental approach: is the right magic? // Jurisprudence. 2015. No. 6. P. 79, 80 (in Russ.).

27. Flavius I. Jewish antiquities: in 2 vols. M., 2007 (in Russ.).

28. Hayek F.A. von Law, legislation and freedom: modern understanding of liberal principles of justice and politics. M., 2006. P. 53 - 72 (in Russ.).

29. Khalfina R.O. Law as a means of social management. M., 1988. P. 103 (in Russ.).

30. Sharpen D. Hammurabi, king of Babylon. M., 2013. P. 205 (in Russ.).

31. Eliade M. Aspects of myth. M., 2010. P. 50 - 54 (in Russ.).

32. Eliade M. History of faith and religious ideas: in 3 vols. / transl. from the French. Vol. 1. From the stone age to the Eleusinian mysteries. M., 2001. P. 199 - 228 (in Russ.).

33. Ellickson R. Order without law: how neighbors settle disputes. M., 2017 (in Russ.).

34. Yung K.G. On the archetypes of the collective unconscious. M., 1991. P. 110 (in Russ.).

35. Yaspers K. The meaning and purpose of history. M., 1991. P. 32–50 (in Russ.).

36. Aubert Vilhelm (1967). Some Social Functions of Legislation. Acta Sociologica 10, no. 1-2: 97–120.

37. Aubert Vilhelm (1965). The Hidden Society. Totowa, New Jersey.

38. Black Donald (2010). Behavior of Law. Bingley, 15.

39. Boaventura de Sousa Santos (2002). Toward a New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalization, and Emancipation. 2nd ed. L., 2-4.

40. Ellickson R. (1991). Order without Law. Cambridge, 281.

41. Feinberg Joel. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Vol. 1: Harm to Others. N.Y., 1984.

42. Habermas Jurgen (1987). Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Boston, 356–373.

43. MacCormick N. (1998). Norms, Institutions, and Institutional Facts // Law and Philosophy 17, no. 3: 159, 310–314.

44. Patrick D. The Enforcement of Morals. Oxford, 1965.

45. Raz J. 1972. Legal Principles and the Limits of Law // The Yale Law Journal 82, no. 5: 823–854.

46. Réforme du Parlement, proportionnelle, état d'urgence... les annonces de Macron à Versailles // Libération. 3.07.2017.

47. Sunstein C.R. (1990). Paradoxes of the Regulatory State // The University of Chicago Law Review 57, no. 2: 407–441.

48. Teubner Gunther (1986). Dilemmas of Law in the Welfare State. New York.

49. Tyran J.-R. (2006). Achieving Compliance when Legal Sanctions are Non-deterrent // Scandinavian journal of Economics 108, no. 1: 135–156.

50. Veitch, Scott, Emilios A. Christodoulidis and Lindsay Farmer (2012). Jurisprudence: themes and concepts. L., 228, 229, 233–235.

51. Zamboni M. (2008). Law and Politics: A Dilemma for Contemporary Legal Theory. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 131, 132.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up