On metocopramide and other absolute evidence in criminal process

Occupation: Chief researcher of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Gosudarstvo i pravo

Edition

Issue 9

Pages

7-16

Abstract

The institute of evidence in the criminal procedure arose long ago, developed inconsistently and was not provided with any scientific basis for a long time – all the evidence was either purely domestic or substantiated by the results of the ordeal. Nowadays this institution is legally regulated, classified in detail, and is based on solid, multi-branch scientific research. However, mainly, including relative proof – conclusion of forensic examinations, polygraph test (polygraph detector), usage of "truth serums", etc. Society, on the other hand, desperately needs criminal justice to be based on absolute proof. There are already scientific methodologies and technologies for such evidence – this is dactyloscopy (it is more than one hundred years old) and DNA analysis (it is about twenty years old, nowadays this method is more expensive and it takes a long time to make it). According to the author, the third in this row will become a mentoscopy method based on the fact that all the information received by a person through his senses is in his memory, and extracting it (what a person has previously seen and heard – accurate to second) is the task of the nearest future science, the fourth in the row of the type of absolute proof, according to the author, will be the method of "removing" the information of the state of human empathy; the fifth will be the reception of the information from person’s ancestors through his genomic nature…

Keywords

criminal procedure, relative proof, absolute proof, dactyloscopy, DNA analysis, mentoscopy, empathy, hereditary genomic information

Received

18.09.2019

Publication date

23.09.2019

Number of characters

40895

Cite

GOST	Kleandrov M. On metocopramide and other absolute evidence in criminal process // Gosudarstvo i pravo – 2019. – Issue 9 C. 7-16 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://gospravo-journal.ru/S013207690006726-0-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006726-0
MLA	Kleandrov, Mikhail I "On metocopramide and other absolute evidence in criminal process." Gosudarstvo i pravo 9 (2019):7-16. DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006726-0
APA	Kleandrov M. (2019). On metocopramide and other absolute evidence in criminal process. Gosudarstvo i pravo (9), pp.7-16 DOI: 10.31857/S013207690006726-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 1101

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Averin Yu. A. Forensic evidence (theoretical study). Saratov, 2006 (in Russ.).

2. Agutin A.V. Philosophical ideas in the criminal procedural proving. M., 2004 (in Russ.).

3. Balakshin V.S. Evidence in the theory and practice of criminal procedural evidence (the most important problems in the light of the criminal procedure code): abstract. dis. ... Doctor of Law'. Ekaterinburg, 2005 (in Russ.).

4. Bastrykin A.I. History of criminology. The beginning of path. Dactyloscopy. M., 2017 (in Russ.).

5. Belkin A.R. Theory of evidence in criminal proceedings. M., 2005 (in Russ.).

6. Vernadsky V.I. About science. Vol. 1. Scientific knowledge. Scientific creativity. Scientific thought. Dubna, 1997 (in Russ.).

7. Gavrishev Alexey. The investigative Committee goes to full independence / Independent newspaper. 2019. June 5 (in Russ.).

8. Denisov V. Errors as a mechanism of justice. On the use by investigators of inadmissible evidence // Lawyer's newspaper. 2019. No. 10 (291). P. 8 - 10 (in Russ.).

9. Zotov D.V. Criminal procedural proof and scientific and technical achievements: theoretical problems. Voronezh, 2005 (in Russ.).

10. Kozlova N. Invisible traces // Ross. newspaper. 2019. 26 Feb (in Russ.).

11. New Russian encyclopedia: in 12 vols. Vol. 12 (1). M., 2003. P. 457 (in Russ.).

12. Popova N.A. Material evidence: collection, presentation and use in proof: abstract. dis. ... PhD in Law. Saratov, 2007 (in Russ.).

13. Prokhorov Yu. B. Evidence in criminal proceedings (epistemological and legal interpretation). SPb., 2004 (in Russ.).

14. Dictionary of philosophical terms / scientific. ed. M., 2005. P. 697 (in Russ.).

15. Shcherbakov S.V. Theory of evidence and proof: content and problems. M., Arkhangelsk, 2007 (in Russ.).