All
 
|
 
 


On the ratio of law enforcement practice and the theory of criminal procedure in the decision of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation (In response to a resolution of Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 51 of December 19, 2017)
 
PIIS013207690004666-4-1
DOI10.31857/S013207690004666-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Vasily Galuzo 
Affiliation: Research Institute of education and science
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 4
Pages163-168
Abstract

In the article, based on the analysis of the provisions of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 51 of December 19, 2017 “On the practice of applying the legislation in criminal cases in the court of first instance” on the correlation of law enforcement practice and the theory of criminal procedure, several judgments are substantiated: for legal science, in General, and for its variety – criminal procedure science, in particular, should be provided priority theory in relation to law enforcement; any disregard of the General rule of the relationship of criminal procedure with law enforcement leads to negative consequences; any decision of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, including the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court No. 51 of December 19, 2017, is only Advisory in nature and cannot replace the criminal procedure legislation, primarily the Criminal procedure Code of the Russian Federation; General provisions of the theory of criminal procedure, as fundamental categories, are developed by representatives of the criminal procedure science; the criminal procedure legislation, especially the Criminal procedure Code of the Russian Federation, should be based on the fundamental provisions of the theory of criminal procedure; and the name and content of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 51 of December 19, 2017 does not correspond to the General provisions of the theory of criminal procedure.

KeywordsRussian Federation, legislation, Constitution of the Russian Federation, Federal law of the Russian Federation, Code of Criminal procedure, criminal procedure law, sources of criminal procedure law, decisions of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, legal science, theory of criminal procedure, law enforcement
Received04.04.2019
Publication date29.04.2019
Number of characters21240
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 3, views: 1290

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Batyuk V.I., Besedin A.V., Galuzo V.N. Dopustimost' dokazatel'stv ili processual'nyh doku-mentov? // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2016. ¹ 12. S. 135 - 140.
2. Batyuk V.I., Galuzo V.N. Princip publichnosti v ugolovnom processe Rossijskoj Federacii: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2013. ¹ 8. S. 96–101.
3. Batyuk V.I., Galuzo V.N. O dejstvennosti rezul'tatov nauchnyh izyskanij v Rossijskoj Feder-acii // Pravo i gosudarstvo: teoriya i praktika. 2015. ¹ 4. S. 103 - 106.
4. Besedin A.V., Galuzo V.N. O realizacii principa glasnosti pri osushchestvlenii sudebnoj vlasti (na primere Lipeckoj oblasti) // Zakon i pravo. 2010. ¹ 8. S. 72–76.
5. Galuzo V.N. Vozmozhno li obespechenie edinoobraznogo ispolneniya zakonodatel'stva pri otsutstvii ego sistematizacii? // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2014. ¹ 11. S. 98 - 102.
6. Galuzo V.N. O roli fundamental'nyh razrabotok v razreshenii sporov mezhdu pred-stavitelyami ugolovno-processual'noj nauki // Pravo i zhizn'. 2013. ¹ 10. S. 86–102.
7. Galuzo V.N. Sistematizaciya zakonodatel'stva v Rossijskoj Federacii: sostoyanie i perspek-tivy razvitiya // Zakon i pravo. 2009. ¹ 8. S. 28 - 30.
8. Galuzo V.N., Kanafin N.A. Organy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya v Rossijskoj Federacii (sos-toyanie i perspektivy razvitiya) // Tavricheskij nauchnyj obozrevatel'. 2015. ¹ 2. S. 58 - 61.
9. Galuzo V.N., Yakupov R.H. Ugolovnyj process: ucheb. 7-e izd., pererab. M., 2013. S. 42, 43, 420, 450, 451.
10. Dokazyvanie v ugolovnom processe Rossijskoj Federacii (teoriya i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika) / pod red. V.S. Afanas'eva. M., 2012. S. 98–104.
11. Dokazyvanie pri pravoprimenenii v Rossijskoj Federacii / pod red. V.N. Galuzo. 4-e izd., ispr. i dop. M., 2018. S. 130–134, 210.
12. Immunitety v rossijskom ugolovnom processe / pod red. V.N. Galuzo. M., 1998.
13. Sidorenko M.V. Pravovaya opredelennost' rossijskogo ugolovno-processual'nogo prava (sos-toyanie i postanovka problemy). M., 2017. S. 251–279.
14. Ugolovnyj process: ucheb. 7-e izd., pererab. / pod obshch. red. A.V. Smirnova. M., 2017. S. 64.
15. Ugolovnyj process: ucheb. dlya bakalavrov / otv. red. L.A. Voskobitova. M., 2016. S. 54, 55.
16. Eriashvili N.D., Galuzo V.N. O sisteme ugolovno-processual'nogo zakonodatel'stva v Ros-sijskoj Federacii // Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta MVD Rossii. 2012. ¹ 2. S. 80 - 82.
17. Yakupov R.H. Pravoprimenenie v ugolovnom processe Rossii (yuridicheskie proble-my). M., 1993.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up