All
 
|
 
 


Development of law contrary to the legal acts (contra legem) in the Republic of Armenia
 
PIIS0018068-4-1
DOI10.31857/S102694520025195-5
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Artur S. Ghambaryan 
Occupation: Head of the Department of Theory of Law and Constitutional Law, Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University
Affiliation: Russian-Armenian (Slavonic) University
Address: Armenia, Yerevan
Journal nameGosudarstvo i pravo
EditionIssue 5
Pages145-157
Abstract

The article discusses the doctrine of law contra legem and the issues of the boundaries of its practical application. The main objectives of the article are to define the development of law contra legem and to present its differences from the development of law extra legem, to analyze the possibility and permissible limits of applying law enforcement agencies to the doctrine of the development of law contra legem in case of a blatant contradiction of law and law. The author claims that the law enforcement of contra legem and contra legem have similarities, therefore, in order to distinguish them, it is proposed to distinguish between hard and soft types of law enforcement of contra legem. Based on the practice of the Republic of Armenia, the article provides examples of law enforcement contra legem, which are subjected to critical analysis.

Keywordsdevelopment of law, law enforcement, contrary to the law, contra legem, extra legem, analogies of the law, legal understanding, unjust law, Radbruch’s formula, judicial system
Received21.12.2021
Publication date30.05.2023
Number of characters52364
Cite  
1 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 173

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Avetyan G. Prohibition of retroactive force of the law in the context of the principle “Nullum Crimen Sine Lege” // Orinakanutyun. 2019. No. 110. P. 28–30 (in Russ.).
2. Vlasenko N.A. Legal understanding in the light of categories of certainty and uncertainty // Journal of Russ. law. 2014. No. 2 (206). P. 37 - 44 (in Russ.).
3. Gambaryan A. Collisions of law and law in the philosophy of law // Scientific Artsakh. 2021. No. 1 (8). P. 75, 76 (in Armenian).
4. Gambaryan A.S. The conflict of laws rule “lex posterior" in Armenian law // Herald of RUDN. 2020. Vol. 24. No. 4. P. 1224 - 1239 (in Russ.).
5. Gambaryan A.S. Silence and acquiescence in the public law of Armenia: legal fiction, presumption or substitution? // Herald of the SPbU. Law. 2021. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 728 - 751 (in Russ.).
6. Gambaryan A. Judicial policy in the Republic of Armenia (general theoretical and methodological problems). Yerevan, 2013. P. 200 - 203 (in Armenian).
7. Iering R. Goal in Law. St. Petersburg, 1881. Vol. 1. P. 300 (in Russ.).
8. Kelsen G. Pure doctrine of law / transl. from German. 2nd ed. SPb., 2015. P. 246 (in Russ.).
9. Kudryavtsev V.N. On legal understanding and legality // State and Law. 1994. No. 3. P. 3 - 8 (in Russ.).
10. Scientific and practical comments on the decisions of the Cassation Court of the Republic of Armenia. Yerevan, 2011. P. 22, 23 (in Armenian).
11. Nersesyants V.S. Philosophy of Law: textbook for universities. M., 1999. P. 593, 594 (in Russ.).
12. General Theory of State and Law: acad. course: in 3 vols / res. ed. M.N. Marchenko. M., 1998. Vol. 2. P. 327 (in Russ.).
13. General Theory of State and Law. L., 1961. P. 431, 432 (in Russ.).
14. Hovhannisyan G. General jurisprudence and legal methodology. Yerevan, 2020. P. 327 (in Armenian).
15. Radbruch G. Legal wrong and law enforcement // Philosophy of Law / transl. from German. M., 2004. P. 233, 234 (in Russ.).
16. Radbruch G. Five minutes of Philosophy of Law // Philosophy of Law / transl. from German. M., 2004. P. 225 (in Russ.).
17. Modern legal understanding: a course of lectures / ed. by M.N. Marchenko. M., 2016 (in Russ.).
18. Sorokin V.V. Fundamental theory of law. M., 2020. P. 81, 82 (in Russ.).
19. Udartsev S.F. Concepts of “Rule of Law” (rule of law) and “Rechtsstaat” (rule of law): comparative analysis // State and Law. 2015. No. 5. P. 5 - 16 (in Russ.).
20. Fedotov A.V. Is it possible to apply contra legem in a democratic state governed by the Rule of Law? // Journal of Russ. law. 2002. No. 8. P. 92 - 99 (in Russ.).
21. Finnis J. Natural Law and Natural rights / transl. from English. M., 2012. P. 435–453 (in Russ.).
22. Thomas Aquinas. The sum of theology. Ch. II-I. Questions 90 - 114. Kiev, 2010. P. 76, 80 (in Russ.).
23. Hart G.L.A. Positivism and the differentiation of law and morality / transl. from English // Jurisprudence. 2005. No. 5. P. 127 (in Russ.).
24. Hart G.L.A. The concept of law / transl. from English. SPb., 2007. P. 16, 209 (in Russ.).
25. Chestnov I.L. The concept of justice in postclassical legal understanding // Jurisprudence. 2013. No. 2 (307). P. 35-50 (in Russ.).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up