Ethnozoology or the Interaction of Humans with the World of Fauna? (An Introduction)

Publication type Article
Status Published
Affiliation: Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow, 32a Leninsky prospekt
Journal nameEtnograficheskoe obozrenie

This article introduces a special theme of the issue discussing the area of research that could be broadly termed as the “interaction of humans with the world of fauna” and that draws on explorations within anthrozoology which focuses on relationships between humans and animals at the level of species; ethnozoology which studies various bonds between people, ethnic groups, and animals; and ethnozoology as ethnoscience whose object of attention is all and any fauna species, and research subject is notions and conceptions about them in one or another cultural or ethnic milieu. The contributors are D.V. Vorobiev, N.S. Shishelov, A.A. Matusovskiy, and D.S. Gvozdikov.

Keywordsethnozoology, ethnoscience, popular knowledge, human animal relations, anthrozoology, ethnobotany
Publication date11.10.2018
Number of characters673
Cite   Download pdf To download PDF you should sign in
Размещенный ниже текст является ознакомительной версией и может не соответствовать печатной

views: 2093

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Alves, R.R.N., and W.M.S. Souto. 2015. Ethnozoology: A Brief Introduction. Ethnobiology and Conservaton 4 (1): 1– 13.

2. Clément, D. 1998. The Historical Foundation of Ethnobiology (1860–1899). Journal of Ethnobiology 18 (2): 161–187.

3. Clément, D. 2012. Le bestiaire inna. Les quadrupèdes. Collection “Mondes Autochtones” [The Innu Bestiary: Quadrupeds. Collection “Mondes Autochtones”]. Québec: Presse de l’Universitй Laval.

4. Gouabault, E., and C. Burton-Jeangros. 2010. L’ambivalence des relations humain-animals: Une analyse socio-anthropologique du monde contemporain [The Ambivalence of Human-Animal Relations: A Social Anthropological Analysis in the Contemporary World]. In Sociologie et sociétés 42 (1): 299–324.

5. Gres, R.A. 2017. Etnobotanika: otechestvennaia i zarubezhnaia paradigmy, napravleniia i perspektivy razvitiia [Ethnobotany: The Domestic and Foreign Paradigms, Directions, and Prospects for Development]. Nauchnyi al’manakh. Nauki o zemle 1–3: 317–327.

6. Kolosova, V.B. 2009. Leksika i simvolika slavianskoi narodnoi botaniki: etnolingvisticheskii aspect [Lexicon and Symbolism of the Slavic Folk Botany: An Ethnolinguistic Aspect]. Moscow: Indrik.

7. Radt, Ch. 1980. L’Homme et L’animale. Premier colloque d’ethnozoologie. Intro de Raymond Pujol [The Human and the Animal: The First Colloquium on Ethnozoology: Introduction by Raymond Pujol]. Le Monde alpin et rhodanien. Revue regionale d’ethnologie 1–2: 165.

8. Rousseau, J., and M. Raymond. 1945. Études ethnobotaniques québéqoises [The Quebec Ethnobotany Studies]. Contributions de l’Institut botanique de l’Université de Montréal 55. Montréal.

9. Rousseau, J. 1946. Notes sur l’ethnobotanique d’Anticosti [Notes on the Anticosti Ethnobotany]. Archives de folklore 1: 60–71.

10. Rousseau, J. 1948. Ethnobotanique et ethnozoologie gaspésiennes. (Semples notes) [Gaspesian Ethnobotany and Ethnozoology]. Archives de folklore 3: 51–64.

11. Sokolova, Z.P. 1972. Kul’t zhivotnykh v religiiakh [The Cult of Animals in Religions]. Moscow: Nauka.

12. Sokolova, Z.P. 1993. Zhivotnye v dukhovnom mire narodov Severnoi Sibiri (teoreticheskie aspekty izucheniia zoolatrii [Animals in the Spiritual World of Northern Siberia (Theoretical Aspects of Studying Zoolatry)]. In Rossiiskii etnograf. Etnologicheskii al’manakh. Antropologiia, kul’turologiia, sotsiologiia [Russian Ethnographer: Ethnological Almanac: Anthropology, Culturology, Sociology], edited by Yu.B. Simchenko and V.A. Tishkov, 203–214. Moscow: IEA RAN.

13. Villerslev, R., P. Vitebski, and A.A. Alekseev. 2016. Zhertvoprinoshenie kak idelnaja ohota: ob’jasnenie istokov domestikatsii severnogo olenja s tjchki zrenija kosmologii [Sacrifice as the Ideal Hunt: A Cosmological Explantation for the Origin of Reindeer Domestication]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 4: 154–175.

14. Vinokurova, I.Yu. 2006. Vepsskaia narodnaia klassifikatsiia zhivotnogo mira (opyt rekonstruktsii) [The Veps Folk Classification of the Animal World (An Attempt at Reconstruction)]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie 4: 126–139.

Система Orphus