Evaluation of the effects from various ways of import substitution “input–output” method: Evidence from the Russian Federation

 
PIIS042473880024869-4-1
DOI10.31857/S042473880024869-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Address: Russian Federation,
Affiliation: HSE University
Address: Russia
Occupation: laboratory researcher
Affiliation: Plekhanov Russian University of Economics
Address: Stremyanny lane, 14.1
Journal nameEkonomika i matematicheskie metody
EditionVolume 59 No. 1
Pages30-47
Abstract

The article is devoted to the issue of assessing the economic effects of import substitution to determine the consequences of investment decisions at the state level in the context of geopolitical risks. Due to a number of economic restrictions on the part of Western countries, the problem of replacing those types of products for which trade turnover were suspended particularly acute. In the conditions of a dramatic shock reduction of supply in the markets of many industries, with the level of demand remaining, there is a need for emergent reorientation of domestic production. Public investments should take into account the multiplier effect caused by the impact of each industry's output on each other. The paper proposes methodology for constructing a theoretical model of global interaction of countries based on input–output tables that take into account the production needs of each industry in the production of other industries and the multiplicative effect. Two experiments, the impact on the economies of all the countries of termination of trade between Russia and the European Union in a number of industries with subsequent measures: the replacement of European products with goods and services through China as well as its import substitution at the expense of Russia's own product facilities. The consequences of two scenarios of changes in output, tax charges, imports and exports of Russia and the EU are estimated; long-term effects are predicted. The practical significance of this work consists in helping to make managerial decisions at the state level in financing certain sectors of the Russian economy.

Keywordsimport substitution, input-output tables, multiplier, intersectoral balance, investment assessment, modeling
AcknowledgmentThe work was carried out within the framework of the project of the Russian Science Foundation (project 22-78-10150) (“Development of a system for assessing and optimal planning of the implementation of state economic projects in conditions of geopolitical risks”).
Received16.03.2023
Publication date29.03.2023
Number of characters30399
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 222

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Akhmadeev B.A., Moiseev N.A. (2017). Method of calculating the coefficient of the industry's influ-ence on the economy. Audit and Financial Analysis, 1, 69–73 (in Russian).

2. Azhekbarov K.A., Abduvaitov E.Ch. (2020). EU economic sanctions against Russia and their conse-quences. Entrepreneur's Guide, 13 (1), 23–31 (in Russian).

3. Baranov A.O., Goreyev A.V. (2019). Assessment of the impact of national projects on the develop-ment of the Russian economy using a dynamic intersectoral model. ECO, 10 (544), 94–114 (in Russian).

4. Barkovsky A.N., Alabyan S.S., Morozenkova O.V. (2015). Consequences of Western sanctions and retaliatory sanctions of the Russian Federation. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, 9, 3–7 (in Russian).

5. Chen Q., Zhu K., Liu P., Chen X., Tian K., Yang L., Yang C. (2018). Distinguishing China's processing trade in the world input-output table and quantifying its effects. Economic Systems Research, 31, 1–21.

6. Dolmatova V.Yu., Bezuglova M.N., Salman O.F. (2020). The impact of anti-Russian sanctions on the economy of the Russian Federation. State and Municipal Administration. Scientific Notes, 2, 130–134 (in Russian).

7. Golovin A.A., Golovin A.A., Parkhomchuk M.A. (2018). The consequences of world economic sanctions for the national economy of Russia. Fundamental Research, 11–2, 216–221 (in Rus-sian).

8. Hong J., Byun J.E., Kim P. (2016). Structural changes and growth factors of the ICT industry in Ko-rea. Telecommunications Policy, 40, 502–513.

9. Kalinin A.M., Koroteev S.S., Krupin A.A., Nefedov A.V. (2021). Technological import dependence of the Russian economy: Assessment using input–output tables. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 1 (184), 83–93 (in Russian).

10. Keynes M.J. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Moscow: Helios ARV (in Russian).

11. Lin H.C., Hsu S.H., Liou R.W., Chang C.C. (2016). A value-added analysis of trade in Taiwan and Korea’s ICT industries. Journal of Korea Trade, 20, 47–73.

12. Luchinkin M. (2021). Protectionism and import substitution as part of the national policy of socio-economic and scientific-technological development. German International Journal of Modern Science, 22, 12–20.

13. Moiseev N.A., Akhmadeev B.A. (2021). An algorithm for assessing import substitution based on in-put-output tables. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 3 (117), 117–129 (in Russian).

14. Mori T., Sasaki H. (2007). Interdependence of production and income in Asia-pacific economies: An international input–output approach. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, 26 (7), 1–29.

15. Serebryakov G.R. (2000). The experience of constructing a dynamic intersectoral equilibrium model of the Russian economy. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 2, 1–17 (in Russian).

16. Shirov A.A., Yantovsky A.A. (2017). Intersectoral macroeconomic model rim — development of tools in modern economic conditions. Studies on Russian Economic Development, 3, 3–18 (in Russian).

17. Simachev Y., Kuzyk M., Zudin N. (2016). Import dependence and import substitution in Russian manufacturing: A business viewpoint. Foresight, 4, 25–45.

18. Timmer M.P., Dietzenbacher E., Los B., Stehrer R., Vries G.J. de (2015). An illustrated user guide to the world input–output database: The case of global automotive production. Review of International Economics, 23, 575–605.

19. Yunushkina A.S., Shapovalova K.A., Katkova E.Yu. (2021) The US trade war with China as an at-tempt to regain global leadership. International Relations, 2, 55–68 (in Russian).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up