Interference of Needs and Economic Decision Making

 
PIIS042473880005786-3-1
DOI10.31857/S042473880005786-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: Leading Research Associate
Affiliation: Institute of Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IEF RAS)
Address: Moscow, Russian Federation
Journal nameEkonomika i matematicheskie metody
Edition
Pages21-33
Abstract

 

Any level of business decisions imply a choice of reaction to current and projected economic events. Not all thoughtful options become real in life, but only those that have successfully passed the mental test of the expediency of implementation. The signal to begin the test is the sense of need, which, starting up the search for economic solutions plays the role of a link between individual consciousness and economy. In contrast to the previous approaches applied to the study of the decision-making process, the author of the article proceeds from non-monotonous nature of the growing need. A wave-like sensation of their urgency is postulated; it allows us to formulate a hypothesis of the needs’ interference. It follows that needs can strengthen and weaken each other, depending on the overlapping of their phases. Mutual influence gives probabilistic properties to the resulting action. The solution can be uniquely identified only at the moment of implementation, that is, the process of its adoption occurs according to the quantum world event scheme. The novelty of the article is the approach to the formation of individual economic solution; it is associated with the properties of quantum processes. The set of needs, their phases and the desirability of ways to meet depend on the composition of the environment in which interference occurs. This environment is institutional, and its influence on the decision maker is determined by education, upbringing and experience of decision-making person. The lack of a deterministic connection between motivating influences and economic decisions and the peculiarities of Russian institutions explain the incompatibility of today's typical behavioral priorities with innovative development, as well as the discrepancy between expected and actual results of reforms.

Keywordsdecision making, action, need, priorities, virtuality, wavelike oscillation, interference, quantum effects, alignment of marginal utility, motivating environment
Received13.08.2019
Publication date22.08.2019
Number of characters40790
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 882

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Avtonomov V.S., Ananyin O.I., Afontsev SA, Gloveli GD, Kapelyushnikov R.I., Makasheva N.A. (2002). History of Economic Thought: Textbook. Manual for University Students. Moscow: Infra-M (in Russian).

2. Chang H.-J. (2015). Economics: The User's Guide. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov i Ferber (in Russian).

3. Chernigovskaya T.V. (2013). Schrodinger's Cheshire Smile: Language and Consciousness. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoi kul'tury (in Russian).

4. Colombatto E. (2016). Markets, Morals, and Policy-Making. A New Defence of Free-Market Economics. Moscow: Mysl' (in Russian).

5. Dirac P. (1932). Fundamentals of Quantum Mechanics. Moscow—Leningrad: State Technical and Theoretical Publishing House. (in Russian).

6. Feynman R.P., Hibbs A.R. (1968). Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. Moscow: Mir (in Russian).

7. Fonotov A.G. (2010). Russia: Innovation and Development. Moscow: BINOM. Laboratorija znanii (in Russian).

8. Frankl V. (1990). Man Searching for Meaning. Moscow: Progress (in Russian).

9. Fukuyama F. (2004). Trust. The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. Moscow: Ermak (in Russian).

10. Galin V.V. (2013). The Last Civilization. Moscow: Algoritm (in Russian).

11. Greenstein G., Zajonc A.G. (2008). The Quantum Challenge. Modern Research on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Dolgoprudnyi: Intellekt (in Russian).

12. Hidalgo C. (2016). Why Information Grows. Moscow: Eksmo (in Russian).

13. Inozemtsev V.L. (2017). The Sovereign Himself. Available at: https://www.gazeta.ru/column/vladislav_inozemcev/10984094.shtml (accessed: December 2018, in Russian).

14. Knyazeva E.N., Kurdyumov S.P. (2002). The Foundations of Synergy. Saint Petersburg: Aleteija (in Russian).

15. Kondratiev N.D., Yakovets Yu.V., Abalkin L.I. (2002). Large Conjuncture Cycles and the Theory of Foresight. Selected Works. Moscow: Ekonomika (in Russian).

16. Malthus Ò. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population. London. Printed for J. Johnson, in St. Paul's Church-Yard. Available at: http://www.esp.org/books/malthus/population/malthus.pdf (accessed: March 2019).

17. Manin Yu.I. (2008). Mathematics as a Metaphor. Moscow: MTsNMO (in Russian).

18. Maslow A. (2016). Motivation and Personality. Saint Petersburg: Piter (in Russian).

19. Mill J.S. (1993). On Liberty. Science and life, 12, 21–26 (in Russian).

20. Myeminas E.Z. (1971). Planning Processes in Economics: Informational Aspect. Moscow: Ekonomika (in Russian).

21. Penrose R. (2003). The Emperor's New Mind. Moscow: URSS (in Russian).

22. Say J.-B. (2007). Treatise on Political Economy. Available at: http://ek-lit.narod.ru/say003.htm (accessed: December 2018, in Russian).

23. Vries J. de (2016). The Industrious Revolution: Consumer Behavior and the Household Economy. Moscow: Delo (in Russian).

24. Wheelan Ch. (2007). Naked Economics: Undressing the Dismal Science. Moscow: Mir (in Russian).

25. Yaremenko Yu.V. (2015). On the Åconomy. Moscow: MAKS Press (in Russian).

26. Yoon O.M. (2012). Ascent to the Information Society. Moscow: Ekonomika (in Russian).

27. Yoon V.O. (2019). The Content of the Concept of Quality in the Economy. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up