The Virtue Ethics Anthropological Turn: Reactualization  of Aristotles Ethics in the Second Half of the 20th Century

The article examines the specifics of the virtue ethics as an anthropological turn in the moral philosophy of the 20th century based on Aristotle's ethics ideas. The article sets a goal to show the specificity of borrowing these ideas determined the virtue ethics thematic development direction in conceptualizing the moral assessment of human activity, but it also became the cause of the main conceptual difficulty (problematization of human nature), it has not been overcome. The article provides an analytical review of the main works of the most significant representatives of the virtue ethics, reconstructs the approaches developed in the works to the conceptualization of moral evaluation of human activity and establishes the role of Aristotle's ideas in the approaches. It is shown the appeal to Aristotle's philosophy primarily occurs when developing a method for determining the moral content of an action in a specific situation, where the application of a universal rule should be supplemented by many conditions of this situation, as well as when trying to return the motive and personal qualities to the description of the conditions. The latter also entails the conceptualization of personal qualities as a moral state of a person, correlated with his development (in possibility — by nature, in reality — in interaction with other people). It is concluded that the virtue ethics borrowed Aristotle's ideas in fragments and without a deep analysis of his philosophy. As a result, the problem of conceptualizing human nature was not solved, which would allow us to come to moral assessments of an act without appeal to a transcendental legislator or abstraction of duty. The achievements of ethics of virtue show: 1) it is impossible to selectively return individual concepts from the past to moral philosophy, but a comprehensive description of the phenomenon of morality in human activity is necessary, 2) the return of old concepts also brings back old problems of former moral theories (in the case of virtue, this is the problem of making a choice and forming a disposition).

Keywords

ethics, morality, virtue, communication, anthropological turn, virtue ethics, discourse ethics, Aristotle, Anscombe, Foote, McIntyre, Nussbaum, Habermas

Received

27.12.2023

Publication date

27.12.2023

Number of characters

38810

Cite

GOST	Platonov R. The Virtue Ethics Anthropological Turn: Reactualization of Aristotle's Ethics in the Second Half of the 20th Century // Chelovek – 2023. – V. 34. – Issue 6 C. 28-47 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070029303-0-1 (circulation date: 17.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070029303-0
MLA	Platonov, Roman "The Virtue Ethics Anthropological Turn: Reactualization of Aristotle's Ethics in the Second Half of the 20th Century." Chelovek 34.6 (2023):28-47. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070029303-0
APA	Platonov R. (2023). The Virtue Ethics Anthropological Turn: Reactualization of Aristotle's Ethics in the Second Half of the 20th Century. Chelovek 34(6), pp.28-47 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070029303-0

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 106

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Agaltsev A.M. Aristotel' o prirode obshcheniya [Aristotle on the nature of communication], Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of Tomsk State University]. N 300(1). 2007. P. 39–42.

2. Apressyan R.G. Problema Drugogo v filosofii Aristotelya [The problem of the Other in Aristotle's philosophy]. Eticheskaya mysl' [Ethical thought]. 2014. N 14. P. 65–85.

3. Aristotle. Nikomakhova etika [Ethica Nicomachea], trans. by N. Braginskaya, Sobranie sochinenii v 4 t. [Collected Works in 4 Vols.]. Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl’ Publ., 1984. P. 53–294.

4. Artemyeva O.V. Dobrodetel' i otvetstvennost' [Virtue and responsibility], Problemy etiki. Filosofsko-eticheskii al'manakh [Problems of ethics. Philosophical and Ethical Almanac]. 2015. N 5. P. 95–108.

5. Artemyeva O.V. Teoreticheskie osnovaniya etiki dobrodeteli [Theoretical foundations of virtue Ethics], Filosofiya i etika. Sbornik nauchnykh trudov k 70-letiyu akademika RAN A.A.Guseinova [Philosophy and Ethics. Collection of scientific papers dedicated to the 70th anniversary of Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences A.A. Guseynov]. Moscow: Alfa-M Publ., 2009. P. 433–445.

6. Hegel G.W.F. Lektsii po istorii filosofii. Kniga vtoraya: Istoriya grecheskoi filosofii [Lectures on the history of philosophy. Book Two: The History of Greek Philosophy]. Sobranie sochinenii v 14 t. [Collected Works in 14 vols.]. Vol. 10. Moscow: Pechatnyi dvor Publ., 1932.

7. Gutorov V.A. Antichnaya sotsial'naya utopiya: voprosy istorii i teorii [Ancient social utopia: questions of history and theory]. Leningrad: Leningrad University Publ., 1989.

8. Dmitriev T.A. Alasder Makintair: moral' posle dobrodeteli [Alasd N 12.air McIntyre: Morality after virtue]. Istoriya filosofii [History of Philosophy]. 2005. N 12. P. 89–123.

9. Habermas J. Mezhdu naturalizmom i religiei. Filosofskie stat'I [Between naturalism and religion. Philosophical articles], transl. by M.B. Skuratov. Moscow: The Whole World Publ., 2011.

10. Habermas J. Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deistvie [Moral consciousness and communicative action], transl. by D. Sklyadnev. Saint Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2001.

11. Anscombe G.E.M. Modern moral philosophy, Philosophy. 1958. Vol. 23, N 124. Р. 1–19.

12. Aristoteles. Die Nikomachische Ethik. Griechisch-Deutsch, Üb. von O. Gigon. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2007.

13. Audi R. Epistemic Virtue and Justified Belief. Virtue epistemology. Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Р. 82–97.

14. Buckle S. Aristotle's Republic or, Why Aristotle's Ethics Is Not Virtue Ethics, Philosophy. 2002. N 77. Р. 565–595.

15. Crisp R. Modern Moral Philosophy and the Virtues. How One Should Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. N 9. P. 1–18.

16. Foot Ph. Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. Р. 1–18.

17. Habermas J. Öffentlicher Raum und politische Öffentlichkeit. Lebensgeschichtliche Wurzeln von zwei Gedankenmotiven. Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2009. S. 15–26.

18. Macintyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007.

19. Newman W. L. The Politics of Aristotle. In 4 vol. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1887.

20. Nussbaum M.C. “Finely Aware and Richly Responsible”: Literature and the Moral Imagination. Love’s Knowledge. Essays on Philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. P. 148–167.

21. Nussbaum M.C. The Discernment of Perception: An Aristotelian Conception of Private and Public Rationality. Love’s Knowledge. Essays on Philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990. P. 54–105.

22. Nussbaum M.C. The Fragility of Goodness. Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press 2000.

23. Nussbaum M.C. Virtue Ethics: a Misleading Category? The Journal of Ethics. 1999. N 3. Р. 163–201.

24. Roche T.D. On the Alleged Metaphysical Foundation of Aristotle’s Ethics. Ancient Philosophy. 1988. Vol. 8 (1). P. 49–62.

25. Swanson Ju.A., David C.C. Aristotle’s Politics. A Reader’s Guide. London; New York: Continuum, 2009.

26. Winter М. Rethinking Virtue Ethics. Heidelberg; London; New York: Springer, 2012. 183 р.