Auschwitz: The Ruined Concept of Evil

Attempts to philosophically comprehend Auschwitz, which inevitably become acts of moral thinking, are faced with the impossibility of relying on the concept of evil and turn into criticism, through to its rejection. H. Arendt's concept of radical evil, which is fundamentally different in content from Kant's, captures the transformation of people into superfluous, which in the idea of the banality of evil is defined as lack of subjectness. Both radical nature and banality take the idea of evil outside the bounds of moral philosophy. But the peculiarity of thinking about Auschwitz also lies in the fact that it does not allow itself to use those “measurement instruments” that are destroyed or discredited by it. Such a discredited means is the dichotomy of good and evil, which lies at the heart of any, but especially Nazi morality: it is in it that the idea of evil and the appeal to it are present to the greatest extent, in contrast to the world of victims and witnesses. The view of Auschwitz and its assessment as evil by an ethical scientist looking from the outside, for whom evil is given as knowledge, is subjected to special criticism: the author refers to the criticism of the idea of knowledge of good and evil by Spinoza and Bonhoeffer. The remaining opportunity to preserve the concept of evil for those who think of Auschwitz as their own act is rejected on the basis of the conclusion that Auschwitz as the ultimate givennes of killing can only be opposed by the givenness of an act of non-murder that is not mediated by moral ideas and norms, primarily by the idea of combating evil

Keywords

Morality, philosophy, evil, Auschwitz, radical evil, Nazi ethic, knowledge of good and evil, act, non-killing

Received

28.09.2022

Publication date

28.09.2022

Number of characters

34232

Cite

GOST	Zubets O. Auschwitz: The Ruined Concept of Evil // Chelovek – 2022. – V. 33. – Issue 4 C. 77-93 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070021629-8-1 (circulation date: 03.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070021629-8
MLA	Zubets, Olga P "Auschwitz: The Ruined Concept of Evil." Chelovek 33.4 (2022):77-93. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070021629-8
APA	Zubets O. (2022). Auschwitz: The Ruined Concept of Evil. Chelovek 33(4), pp.77-93 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070021629-8

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 215

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Agamben J. Homo sacer. Chto ostaetsya posle Osvencima: arkhiv i svidetel'. [Homo sacer. Remnants of Auschwitz: The Witness and the Archive]. Moscow: Evropa Publ., 2012.

2. Amery J. Po tu storonu prestupleniya i nakazaniya. Popytki odolennogo odolet' [At the Mind's Limits: Contemplations by a Survivor on Auschwitz and Its Realities]. Moscow: Novoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 1977.

3. Arendt H. Istoki totalitarizma [The Origins of Totalitarianism], eds: M. S. Kovaleva, D. M. Nosov. Moscow: CentrKom Publ., 1996.

4. Arendt H. Skrytaya tradiciya [The Jew as Pariah: A Hidden Tradition]. Moscow: Text Publ., 2008a.

5. Arendt H. Ehjkhman v Ierusalime. Istoriya obydennykh zlodeyanij [Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil]. Jerusalem-Moscow: DDA /Znanie Publ., 2008b.

6. Arendt H., Jaspers K. Pis'ma, 1926–1969 [Letters, 1926–1969]. Moscow: Instituta Gajdara Publ., 2021.

7. Bonhoeffer D. Ehtika [Ethics]. Transl. from Germ. Moscow: BBI Publ., 2013.

8. Gradovsky Z. V serdcevine ada: Zapiski, najdennye v peple vozle pechej Osvencima [In the Heart of Hell: Notes Found in the Ashes near the Auschwitz Furnaces]. Moscow: Gamma-Press Publ., 2011.

9. Kant I. Religiya v predelakh tol'ko razuma [Religion within the Bounds of Bare Reason]. Traktaty i Pis'ma [Treatises and Letters]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1980.

10. Levi P. Kanuvshie i spasyonnye [The Drowned and the Saved]. Moscow: Novoe Publ., 2010.

11. Shestov L. Kirgegard i ehkzistencial'naya filosofiya [Kierkegaard and the Existential Philosophy]. Shestov L. Apofeoz bespochvennosti [Apotheosis of Groundlessness]. Moscow: AST Publ., 2000. P. 621–809.

12. Bernstein R. J. Reflections on Radical Evil: Arendt and Kant. Soundings: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 2002. Vol. 85. P. 17–30.

13. Cohen J. Interrupting Auschwitz: Art, Religion, Philosophy. New York–London: Philosophy continuum, 2005.

14. Geddes J. G. Banal Evil and Useless Knowledge: Hannah Arendt and Charlotte Delbo on Evil after the Holocaust. The Double Binds of Ethics after the Holocaust. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009. P. 119–132.

15. Haas P. J. Morality after Auschwitz: The Radical Challenge of the Nazi Ethic. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1988.

16. Harvey W.Z. Two Jewish Approaches to Evil in History. Wrestling with God Jewish Theological Responses during and after the Holocaust. Steven T. Katz, Sh. Biderman, G. Greenberg (Eds). Oxford Univ. Press, 2007. P. 326–331.

17. Ricoeur P. The Symbolism of Evil. Boston: Beacon Press, 1986.

18. Russell N. The Nazi’s Pursuit for “Humane” Method of Killing. Understanding Willing Participants. 2019. Vol. 2. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 241–276.

19. Tec N. When Light Pierced the Darkness: Christian Rescue of Jews in Nazi-Occupied Poland. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1986.