Childbirth in the uncertainty of COVID-19

The article describes the situation of uncertainty associated with childbirth during COVID-19. Future insecurity can increase women’s subjective experience of vulnerability. The theoretical analysis lets to determine three key points. These points provide information about subjective attitudes towards childbirth in a situation of uncertainty. (1) understanding the seriousness and fear of COVID-19, (2) the changes in routine prenatal care (3) changes in routines and social lives. Based on the proposed conceptual framework, an online survey was conducted in November 2021. 57 women who gave birth between May 2020 and November 2021 were interviewed. The questions were about: (1) the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants and their families (2) characteristics of childbirth during a pandemic. The Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS-R) was also used. The results of the study were analyzed from the perspective of the identified key themes. We describe the specifics of psychological distress. We state that factors that intensify anxieties and negative perceptions of the situation correlate with general life satisfaction. A significant role in the acceptance of uncertainty plays the personal experience of illness.

Keywords

pandemic, COVID-19, situation of uncertainty, pregnancy, childbirth, restrictions, anxieties, subjective perception

Received

16.06.2022

Publication date

24.06.2022

Number of characters

32106

Cite

GOST	Novikova T., Korgozha M., Evmenenko A. Childbirth in the uncertainty of COVID-19 // Chelovek – 2022. – V. 33. – Issue 3 C. 159-176 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070020519-7-1 (circulation date: 03.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070020519-7
MLA	Novikova, Tatiana, Korgozha, Maria A, Evmenenko, Alesya O "Childbirth in the uncertainty of COVID-19." Chelovek 33.3 (2022):159-176. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070020519-7
APA	Novikova T., Korgozha M., Evmenenko A. (2022). Childbirth in the uncertainty of COVID-19. Chelovek 33(3), pp.159-176 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070020519-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 349

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Anikina V.O., Savenysheva S.S., Blokh M.E. Psikhicheskoe zdorov'e i otnoshenie k beremennosti i rebenku u beremennykh zhenshchin v period pandemii koronavirusa COVID-19 [Women’s Mental Health During Pregnancy under the COVID-19 Coronavirus Pandemic: A Review of Foreign Studies]. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya. 2021. Vol. 10, N 1. P. 70–78. DOI: 10.17759/jmfp.2021100107.

2. Arshavskiy I.A. Ocherki po vozrastnoy fiziologii [Profiles on physiology of age]. Moscow: Meditsina Publ., 1967.

3. Belinskaya E.P. Neopredelennost' kak kategoriya sovremennoy sotsial'noy psikhologii lichnosti [Uncertainty as a category of modern social psychology of personality]. Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. Vol. 7, N 36. P. 3. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://psystudy.ru/index.php/num/article/view/604 (date of access: 10.01.2022).

4. Dannye ob urovne vakcinacii COVID-19 v Rossii [Data on the level of vaccination of COVID-19 in Russia]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://xn--80aesfpebagmfblc0a.xn--p1ai/information/ (date of access: 07.03.2022)

5. Demograficheskaya modernizatsiya Rossii, 1900–2000 [Demographic modernization of Russia, 1900–2000], ed. by A.G. Vishnevsky. Moscow: Novoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 2006.

6. Zdravomyslova E.A., Temkina A.A. Doverie i sotrudnichestvo vracha-ginekologa i patsientki [Confidence and cooperation of a gynecologist and a patient]. Obshchestvo remissii: na puti k narrativnoy meditsine [Remission Society: on the way to narrative medicine]. Samara: Samara State University Publ., 2012. P. 124–168.

7. Korgozha M.A., Evmenenko A.O. Skriningovaya shkala perinatal'noy trevogi (PASS-R). Kratkoe rukovodstvo po ispol'zovaniyu. Metodicheskoe posobie [Perinatal Anxiety Screening Scale (PASS-R). Brief guide to use. Toolkit]. Saint Petersburg: SPbGPMU Publ., 2021.

8. Kuksa T.L. Partnerskie rody i individual'nye soprovozhdeniya v usloviyakh COVID-19: vlastnye resheniya, praktiki i diskursy [Partnered Childbirth and Individual Care Providers in COVID-19 Conditions: Power Decisions, Practices and Discourses]. Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2021. N 6. P. 41–63.

9. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii «Organizatsiya okazaniya meditsinskoy pomoshchi beremennym, rozhenitsam, rodil'nitsam i novorozhdennym pri novoy koronavirusnoy infektsii». Ministerstvo Zdravookhraneniya RF. Versiya 5. [Methodological recommendations “Organization of medical assistance to pregnant women, women giving birth, women giving birth and newborns on new coronavirus infection”. Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation. Version 5]. 2021. [Electronic resource] URL: https://static-0.minzdrav.gov.ru/system/attachments/attaches/000/059/052/original/BMP_preg_5.pdf (date of access: 10.01.2022).

10. Ozhiganova A.A. «Chto-to ne tak s etim kovidom»: proizvodstvo nedoveriya v rossiyskom rodovspomozhenii v situatsii pandemii.[“Something is off with this COVID”: Production of mistrust in Russian obstetrics in a pandemic situation]. Shagi/Steps. 2021. Vol. 7, N 4. P. 151–172.

11. Ozhiganova A.A., Molodtsova M.O. Rody v uslovijah karantina: pozicija douly [Birth during Quarantine: Doula’s Stance]. Medicinskaja antropologija i biojetika. 2020. N 1(19). P. 158–173. DOI: 10.33876/2224-9680/2020-1-19/09.

12. Petukhov A.S., Pirogov S.V. Teorii praktik kak metodologiya izucheniya povsednevnosti [Theories of Practice as a Methodology for the Study of Everyday Life]. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2018. N 41. P. 159–167.

13. Sidorova T.A. Detorozhdenie: sozdanie ili tvorenie? [Childbearing: Re-production or Creation?]. Chelovek. 2021. Vol. 32, N 6. P. 135–149.

14. Sociologiya pandemii. Proekt korona FOM [Sociology of pandemic. The corona project by the Public Opinion Foundation], head of the author's team A.A. Oslon. Moscow: Institute of the Public Opinion Foundation (inFOM), 2021.

15. Tartakovskaya, I. N. Doverie pered litsom pandemii: v poiskakh tochki opory [Trust in the Face of a Pandemic: Finding a Foothold]. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal. 2021. Vol. 27, N 2. P. 68–89.

16. Temkina A. “Ekonomika doveriya” v platnom segmente rodovspomozhenii: gorodskaya obrazovannaya zhenshhina kak potrebitel’ i patsientka [“Economy of Trust” in Commercial Obstetric Care: Educated Urban Women as Consumers and Patients]. Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya. 2017. Vol. 18, N 3. P. 14–53. DOI: 10.17323/1726-3247-2017-3-14-53.

17. Federal'naya sluzhba gosudarstvennoy statistiki. Demografiya [Federal State Statistics Service. Demography]. 2021. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/12781 (date of access: 10.01.2022)

18. Shyuts A. Struktura povsednevnogo myshleniya [The Structure of Everyday Thinking]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 1988. N 2. P. 129–137.

19. Ahlers-Schmidt C.R., Hervey A.M., Neil T., Kuhlmann S., Kuhlmann Z. Concerns of women regarding pregnancy and childbirth during the COVID-19pandemic. Patient Educ Couns. 2020. N 103(12). P. 2578–2582. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.09.031

20. Ayaz R., Hocaoglu M., Gunay T., et al. Anxiety and depression symptoms in the same pregnant women before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Perinatal Medicin. 2020. N 48(9). P. 965–970. DOI: 10.1515/jpm-2020-0380

21. Coxon K., Turienzo C.F., Kweekel L., Goodarzi B., Brigante L., Simon A., Lanau M.M. The impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on maternity care in Europe. Midwifery. 2020. N 88. P.102779. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102779

22. Ford E., Lee S., Shakespear J., et al. Diagnosis and management of perinatal depression and anxiety in general practice: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. British Journal of General Practice. 2017. N. 67(661). P. 538–546. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp17X691889

23. Lebel C., MacKinnon A., Bagshawe M., et al. Elevated depression and anxiety symptoms among pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2020. N 277. P. 5–13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.126

24. Lazarus J.V., Ratzan S.C., Palayew A., Gostin L.O., Larson H.J., Rabin K., Kimball S., El-Mohandes A. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med. 2021. N 27(2). P. 225–228. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9

25. Lefkovics E., Rigo J., Szita B., et al. Relevance of anxiety in the perinatal period: prospective study in a Hungarian sample. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2018. N 39(3). P. 220–227. DOI: 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1338264

26. Mertens G., Gerritsen L., Duijndam S., et al. Fear of the coronavirus (COVID-19): Predictors in an online study conducted in March 2020. J Anxiety Disord. 2020. N 74. P. 102258. DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102258

27. Mizrak Sahin B., Kabakci E.N. The experiences of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey: A qualitative study. Women Birth. 2021. N 34(2). P. 162–169. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.09.022

28. Skjefte M., Ngirbabul M., Akeju O., Escudero D., Hernandez-Diaz S., Wyszynski D.F., Wu J.W. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women and mothers of young children: results of a survey in 16 countries. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021. N 36(2). P. 197–211. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-021-00728-6

29. Tomfohr-Madsen L., Racine N., Giesbrecht G., et al. Depression and anxiety in pregnancy during COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research. 2021. N 300. P. 113912. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113912

30. Yakovi Gan-Or N. Going solo: the law and ethics of childbirth during the COVID-19pandemic. J Law Biosci. 2020. N 7(1). P. lsaa079. DOI: 10.1093/jlb/lsaa079