All
 
|
 
 


Alarmist Discourse of the Future: From Cyberpunk to Ecology
 
PIIS023620070020516-4-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070020516-4
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Samson Liberman 
Affiliation: Kazan Federal University
Address: 18, Kremlevskaya Str., Kazan' 420008, Russian Federation
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 33 Issue 3
Pages119-137
Abstract

The Coronavirus pandemic forces us to reconsider our usual ideas about the future and historical development. The eternal present, the end of history, and many other concepts that problematize the possibility of the future are almost unusable for analyzing modern historical expectations. The return of concepts of the utopian and political, the return of concept of the future are visible to the naked eye not only in the public field, but also in scientific and philosophical discussions. However, the pandemic not only reactualizes the old discourses of the future, but also brings to the fore completely new or just appeared. The latter include the alarmist discourse of the future, which is considered in the article. The author proposes to consider its main characteristic the idea of the future as a threat to the life of mankind. Unlike eschatological historical representations, such an end of the world cannot be presented as the “goal” or “meaning” of human history. The invasion does not come from the realm of the transcendent and divine, not from the space of utopia/anti-utopia, but from the “neighboring” competing realm of the non-human. Unlike utopia and the transcendent, which can be imagined as alienated humanity, the invasion of non-humans is fundamentally external to us. And if N. Land's cyberpunk can still be represented as a progressive development, when a person turns out to be a means of existence of machines, a transitional link of evolution, then modern “ecological” and “materialistic” philosophies speak of literally non-human: animals, viruses, asteroids, carbon derivatives, etc. This “neighborhood” with a Stranger most resembles mythological, pre-religious ideas, especially in their interpretation by E.V. de Castro. Therefore, the project of anthropology of the latter is the author's main theoretical reference point when considering the alarmist discourse of the future. The second approach to its theorization is connected with the development of the analysis of modern capitalism, primarily with the concepts of N. Srnicek (platform capitalism) and H. Frank (attention economics).

Keywordsfuture, postmodern, platform capitalism, alarmism, eternal present, end of history, posthistorism, Аlien, Other
Received16.06.2022
Publication date24.06.2022
Number of characters33247
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 322

Readers community rating: votes 0 

1. Afanasov N.B. “Traur po budushhemu”, ili Kartografiya apokalipsisa [“Mourning for the Future”, or Cartography of the Apocalypse]. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. 2020. Vol. 2, N 1. P. 205–220.
2. Budraitskis I. Apokalipsis i politiki nevozmozhnogo [The Apocalypse and the Politics of the Impossible]. Logos. 2021. Vol. 31, N 4. P. 193–218.
3. Deleuze G. Peregovory. 1972–1990 [Negotiation. 1972–1990], transl. from French by V.Yu. Bystrov. St. Petersburg: Nauka Publ., 2004.
4. Dupuit J.-P. Malaya metafizika tsunami [Small Metaphysics of the Tsunami], transl. from French by A. Zakharevich. St. Petersburg: Ivan Limbah Publ. House, 2019.
5. Castrо E.V. de. Kannibal'skie metafiziki. Rubezhi poststrukturnoi antropologii [Cannibal Metaphysics. Frontiers of Poststructural Anthropology], transl. from French by D. Kralechkin. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2017.
6. Kobylin I. Nevidimaya ruka istorii: “guvernamental'nost'”, providentsial'naya mashina i istoricheskii materializm [The Invisible Hand of History: Governmentality, the Providential Machine, and Historical Materialism]. Logos. 2021. Vol. 31, N 4. P. 247–265.
7. Land N. Vytvoryaya eto so smert'yu: zametki o Tanatose i zhelayushhem proizvodstve [Doing It with Death: Notes on Thanatos and Wishing Production], transl. from Engl. by А. Morozov. Land N. Sochineniya: v 6 t. [Works: in 4 vol.], ed. by A. Morozov. Vol. 2. Perm': Hyle Press Publ., 2018а.
8. Land N. Mashinnoe zhelanie [Machine Desire], transl. from Engl. by D.Ya. Khamis. Land N. Sochineniya: v 6 t. [Works: in 4 vol.], ed. by A. Morozov. Vol. 2. Perm': Hyle Press Publ., 2018в.
9. Lovink G. Kriticheskaya teoriya interneta [Critical Internet Theory], transl. from Engl. by D. Lebedev, P. Torkanovskii. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press: Muzei sovremennogo iskusstva “Garazh” Publ., 2019.
10. Negarestani R. Ciklonopediya: souchastie s anonimnymi materialami [Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials], transl. from Engl. by P. Hanova. Moscow: Nosorog Publ., 2019.
11. Nikolai F.V., Kobylin I.I. “Vyigrat' vremya”, ili Temporal'nye (za)stenki neoliberal'nogo kapitalizma [“Buying Time” or the Temporal Walls of Neoliberal Capitalism]. Sociologiya vlasti. 2021. Vol. 33, N 1. Р. 84–102.
12. Pavlov A.V. Chto novogo v novom kapitalizme? [What is New in New Capitalism?]. Sociologiya vlasti. 2021. Vol. 33, N 1. Р. 39–63.
13. Regev Y. Nevozmozhnoe i sovpadenie: O revolucionnoi situatsii v filosofii [The Impossible and the Coincidence: On the Revolutionary Situation in Philosophy], transl. from Ivrit by M. Makarovskiy; transl. from Engl. by P. Hanova. Perm': Hyle Press Publ., 2016.
14. Srnicek N. Capitalism platform [Platform Capitalism], ed. and transl. from Engl. by M. Dobryakova; National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ. House, 2019.
15. Stigler B. Uprazdnennyi individ [Abolished Individual]. Sygma. 24.04.2019 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://syg.ma/@lacanalia/biernar-stighlier-uprazdniennyi-individ-nieudobstvo-kultury-v-epokhu-psikhichieskoi-i-sotsialnoi-diezindividuatsii  (date of access: 15.01. 2022).
16. Fukuyama F. Identichnost': Stremlenie k priznaniu i politika nepriyatiya: per. s angl. [Identity: Desire for Recognition and Politics of Rejection: transl. from Engl.]. Moscow: Al'pina Pablisher Publ., 2019.
17. Harvey D. Sostoyanie postmoderna: Issledovanie istokov kul'turnyh izmenenii [The Postmodern State: Exploring the Origins of Cultural Change], transl. from Engl. by N. Protsenko; ed. by A. Pavlov; National Research University Higher School of Economics. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publ. House, 2021.
18. Tsukerman E. Novye soedineniya: Cifrovye kosmopolity v kommunikativnuyu ehpokhu [New Connections: Digital Cosmopolitans in the Communication Age], transl. from Germ. by A. Fomenko. Moscow: Ad Marginem Press Publ., 2015.
19. Eliade M. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii [The Myth of the Eternal Return], transl. from French by E. Morozova, E. Murashkinceva. St. Petersburg: Aleteia Publ., 1998.
20. Franck G. The Economy of Attention. Telepolis.1999. Dec. 7.
21. Kahneman D. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
22. Liberman S. Attention Deficit: Alienation in Platform Capitalism. Symposion. 2021. Vol. 8, Iss. 1. Р. 79–88.
23. Smythe D.W. On the Audience Commodity and its Work. Media and Cultural Studies: KeyWorks. Hong Kong: Blackwell Publ., 1981.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up