Against Naturalism. On Rational Strategies and Role of Idealizations

 
PIIS023620070019509-6-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070019509-6
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: Российская Федерация, 109240 Москва, ул. Гончарная, д. 12, стр. 1
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 33 Issue 2
Pages25-45
Abstract

The article outlines the main hypotheses of the research program "Thinking, consciousness and freedom". The cluster of concepts consciousness-meaningfulness-autonomy-rationality-(in)determinism-subjectivity-idealization is under consideration. The significance of transcendentalist disposition for theories of consciousness striving for maximum consistency with reliable results of modern sciences is substantiated. On the one hand, mutually compatible variants of interpretations of the above-mentioned concepts are analyzed; on the other hand, conceptual constellations leading to the effects of theoretical trivialization of basic forms of human knowledge and self-understanding are revealed. The importance of conjugacy of the phenomenon of rational activity and the processes of (re)establishing autonomy is emphasized. Special attention is paid to the metaphysical presumptions underlying a number of scientific theories, and, accordingly, to the issue of existential and metaphysical self-determination of modern man.

Keywordsconsciousness, idealization, autonomy, rationality, (in)determinism, subjectivity, authorship
Received06.04.2022
Publication date11.05.2022
Number of characters41353
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 276

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Gutner G.B. Risk i otvetstvennost' sub'ekta kommunikativnogo dejstviya. M.: Institut filosofii RAN — Svyato-Filaretovskij pravoslavno-khristianskij institut, 2008.

2. Gutner G.B. Risk i otvetstvennost' sub"ekta kommunikativnogo dejstviya [Risk and responsibility of the subject of a communicative act]. Institut filosofii RAN — Svyato-Filaretovskij pravoslavno-hristianskij institute Publ., 2008.

3. Nepejvoda N.N. Prikladnaya logika. Izdatel'stvo Novosibirskogo universiteta, 2000.

4. Nepejvoda N. N. Prikladnaya logika [Applied logic]. Novosibirsk University Publ., 2000.

5. Pavlov-Pinus K.A. Smysl i usloviya vozmozhnosti avtonomnoj ratsional'nosti. Filosofskie problemy informatsionnykh tekhnologij i kiberprostranstva. 2018. № 2(15). S. 50–71.

6. Pavlov-Pinus K.A. Smysl i usloviya vozmozhnosti avtonomnoj racional'nosti [Meaning and conditions of possibility of autonomous rationality] Filosofskie problemy informacionnyh tekhnologij i kiberprostranstva. 2018. N 2(15). P. 50–71.

7. Pavlov-Pinus K.A. Ponyatie universal'nosti v ramkakh kibernetiki vtorogo poryadka. Vox. Filosofskij zhurnal. №34, 2021. URL: https://vox-journal.org/html/issues/612/617 (data obrascheniya: 10.02.2022)

8. Pavlov-Pinus K.A. Ponyatie universal'nosti v ramkah kibernetiki vtorogo poryadka [The concept of universality in the framework of second-order cybernetics] Vox. Filosofskij zhurnal. 2021. N 34. URL: https://vox-journal.org/html/issues/612/617 (date of access: 10.02.2022)

9. Porus V.N. Mnogomernost' ratsional'nosti. Ehpistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2010. T. XXIII, №1. S. 5–16.

10. Porus V.N. Mnogomernost' racional'nosti [Multidimensionality of rationality]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2010. Vol. XXIII. N 1. P. 5–16.

11. Porus V.N., Metafora i ratsional'nost'. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. №1, 2005, S.134–141.

12. Porus V.N., Metafora i racional'nost' [Metaphor and rationality]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii. 2005. N 1. P. 134–141.

13. Sasskind L. Kosmicheskij landshaft. Teoriya strun i illyuziya razumnogo zamysla Vselennoj / per. s angl. SPb.: Piter, 2015.

14. Susskind L. Kosmicheskij landshaft. Teoriya strun i illyuziya razumnogo zamysla Vselennoj [The cosmic landscape. String theory and the illusion of Intelligent design]. Transl. from Eng. St.-Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2015.

15. Serl' Dzh.R. Ratsional'nost' v dejstvii / per. na russkij yazyk A. Kolodij, E. Rumyantsevoj. M.: Progress-Traditsiya, 2004.

16. Searle J. Racional'nost' v dejstvii [Rationality in action]. Transl. from Eng. by A. Kolodij, E. Rumyanceva. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya Publ., 2004.

17. Dennett D., From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds. W. W. Norton & Company, 2017.

18. Hofstadter D. Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought. New York: Basic Books, 1995.

19. Ludwig David and Stéphanie Ruphy, "Scientific Pluralism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Winter 2021 Edition. Edward N. Zalta (ed.). URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/scientific-pluralism. (date of access: 10.02.2022)

20. On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. Center for Research on Foundation Models (CRFM), Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI), Stanford University. URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2108.07258.pdf. (date of access: 10.02.2022)

21. Russel B. Principles of Mathematics. London, New York, 2010.

22. Searle J. R. The Word Turned Upside Down. The New York Review of Books, 1983. P. 74–79.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up