Socio-philosophical Approach to the Problem of Human Subjectivity

 
PIIS023620070018379-3-1
DOI10.31857/S023620070018379-3
Publication type Article
Status Published
Authors
Occupation: head of the Department of Social Philosophy, Faculty of Philosophy of the Lomonosov Moscow State University
Affiliation: Lomonosov Moscow State University
Address: Building 4, 27 Lomonosovsky Prospekt, Moscow 119991, Russian Federation.
Journal nameChelovek
EditionVolume 33 Issue 4
Pages7-25
Abstract

The author analyzes the phenomenon of the subject in its socio-philosophical perspective, which differs from the ontological, gnoseological, and anthropological consideration of subjectivity. Using the methodology of the substantive-activity approach, the author considers the subject as an active entity capable of initiating and controlling goal-oriented activity aimed at satisfying his own needs, interests, and goals. The author is convinced that the properties of the social subject - the ability to self-purpose existence, based on the motivational examination of different options of behavior and the free choice between them - have only separately taken people, human individuals. The author criticizes the ideas of "methodological collectivism," which attributes subjectivity to society, the state, and other institutional forms of human coexistence that influence activity but are not capable of carrying it out. The article analyzes organizational forms of subject-object mediation based on links of intersubjectivity, compositional intersection, and interpenetration. The author offers his understanding of the well-known philosophical formulas: "there is no activity without a subject and no subject outside of activity"; "there is no activity without an object and no object outside of activity"; "there is no subject without an object". The author considers subjectivity as the most important property of man, which is preserved by him in the conditions of forced functioning, which presupposes normally interiorization of externally imposed goals and agreement to their realization. At the same time, a person is capable of losing his or her subjective status in a situation when external coercion deprives him or her of the freedom of choice - when it is not a person who does something, but something is done to a person, using another person's activity as an object.

KeywordsSubstance, function, activity, subject, object, need, interest, purpose, motive, value, freedom
AcknowledgmentThe article was prepared within the framework of the activities of scientific school of the Moscow State University "Preservation of the world cultural-historical heritage" supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences project No. 21-511-93006, as well as Russian Science Foundation project 22-28-00927 "Diagnosis of modernity and global public challenges in socio-philosophical reflection".
Received28.09.2022
Publication date28.09.2022
Number of characters38921
Cite  
100 rub.
When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 1, views: 350

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Bart R. Smert' avtora [La mort de l'auteur], transl. from French. Bart R. Izbrannye raboty. Semiotika. Poetika [Fuvres sélectionnées], Moscow: Progress Publ., 1989.

2. Baudrillard J. Prozrachnost' zla [La transparence du mal], transl. from French by L. Lyabarskaya, E. Markovskaya. Moscow: Dobrosvet Publ., 2000.

3. Bhascar R. Obshchestva [Societies], transl. from English. Sociologos, Iss. 1. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1991.

4. Galanina K.E. Transformaciya koncepta sub"ekta v filosofii Lyudviga Vitgenshtejna [The Transformation of the Concept of the Subject in the Philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein]. Voprosy filosofii. 2011. N 7. P. 68–81.

5. Deleuze J. O smerti cheloveka i o sverhcheloveke [De la mort de l'homme et du surhomme]. Deleuze J. Fuko [Foucault], transl. from French by E.V. Syomina. M.: Humanitarian Literature Publishers Publ., 1998.

6. Il'enkov E.V. Problema ideal'nogo [The Problem of the Ideal]. Voprosy filosofii. 1979. N 6. P. 128–140.

7. Il'in A.N. Antropologiya sub"ekta [Anthropology of the Subject]. Information humanitarian portal “Knowledge. Understanding. Skill”. N 1. 2010.

8. Momdzhyan K.Kh. Universal'nye potrebnosti i rodovaya priroda cheloveka [Universal needs and the generic nature of man]. Voprosy filosofii. 2015. N 2. P. 3–15.

9. Momdzhyan K.H. Social'no-filosofskij analiz svobody chelovecheskoj voli [Sociophilosophical Analysis of the Freedom of the Human Will]. Voprosy philosofii. 2017. N 9. P. 68–81.

10. Momdzhyan K.Kh. Substancial'nyj podhod v teoreticheskom obshchestvoznanii, ego neobhodimost' i principy [The Substantial Approach in Theoretical Social Science, Its Necessity and Principles]. Voprosy filosofii. 2022. N 2. P. 71–82.

11. Fomenko A.P. Problema sub"ekta v filosofii postmodernizma [The Problem of the Subject in the Philosophy of Postmodernism]. Tsennosti i smysly. 2016. N 2. P. 8–18.

12. Frankl V. Chelovek v poiskah smysla [Man in Search of Meaning]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1990.

13. Foucault M. Slova i veshchi. Arheologiya gumanitarnyh nauk [Les mots et les choses. Archéologie des sciences humaines], transl. from French by V.P. Vizgin, N.S. Avtonomova. St. Petersburg: A-cad Publ., 1994.

14. Shtompka P. Sociologiya social'nyh izmenenij [Sociology of Social Change]. transl. from English by V.A. Yadov. Moscow: Aspect Press Publ., 1996.

Система Orphus

Loading...
Up