On Valery Podoroga: Reflecting on the years of our friendship…

This essay remembers Valery Podoroga, whom I knew during the years of transition from Soviet to post-Soviet Russia. The details of our fortuitous meeting in Moscow in 1987 are chronicled in my book, Dreamworld and Catastrophe (2000), when we shared an interest in the early cinema of Eisenstein and Vertov, and a conviction that sensory experience — aesthetics in the general sense of the word — was the entryway to philosophizing. Podoroga translated these techniques of image-perception into a totally original, philosophical way of reading literature. Mimesis, his major work, contains reflections on the novels of Gogol, Dostoyevsky, Platonov, and others, analysing the sensory quality of these texts in order to feel bodily the transitory worlds that they created. Podoroga reads Platonov as embodying the rapid industrialization and agricultural collectivisation of high-Stalinism, a mimetic response that leads to the “de-anthropologisation” of experience. Mimesis describes how the bursting of literary forms culminates in the revolutionary consciousness of the avant-garde. Podoroga’s relation to Marx, who was a monumental figure in his childhood, differed from that of his predecessors (Lukacs, Lifschitz and others), and had affinities to Derrida’s reading of Marx’s “ghosts”. He considered the new, “glamorous” Marxism of the younger generation (editors of Stasis) as quite comfortably bourgeois and cautions that the equality of socialism was an equality of poverty. Podoroga valued the individual as the only possible philosophical subject. His idea of freedom was as an inner experience, which he himself attained in the last Soviet years when the archives of Western books opened to him and a “feast of knowledge” was made available. This private, inner freedom of reading and thinking was for him a kind of utopia. Yet this exercise of freedom was a strictly individual pursuit. Reflecting on the years of our friendship, 1987–2016, I ask whether the phenomenological experience of freedom would not, rather, require public acts of resistance.

Keywords

anthropogram, aesthetic avant-garde, cinematic perception, laboratory of philosophy, linguistic perception, machine mimesis, mass perception, philosophical anthropology, philosophy as image, political vision, revolution and affect, sensory ontology, visual solidarity

Publication date

23.11.2021

Number of characters

47210

Cite

GOST	Buck-Morss S. On Valery Podoroga: Reflecting on the years of our friendship… // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №5 C. 29-49 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070017437-7-1 (circulation date: 02.05.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017437-7
MLA	Buck-Morss, Susan "On Valery Podoroga: Reflecting on the years of our friendship…." Chelovek 32.5 (2021):29-49. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017437-7
APA	Buck-Morss S. (2021). On Valery Podoroga: Reflecting on the years of our friendship…. Chelovek 32(5), pp.29-49 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070017437-7

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 2, views: 594

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aronson O. Metakino. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 1993.

2. Aronson O.V. Forms of Thought within the Limits of the Body (On the Analytical Metaphysics of Valery Podoroga). Russian Studies in Philosophy. 2016. Vol. 54. N 4. P. 257–266.

3. Buck-Morss S. Aesthetics and Anaesthetics: Walter Benjamin’s Artwork Essay Reconsidered. October. Autumn 1992. N 62. P. 3–41.

4. Buck-Morss S. Dreamworld and Catastrophe: the passing of mass utopia in East and West. Cambridge/Massachusetts/London: The MIT Press, 2000.

5. Buck-Morss S. Revolution Today. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2019.

6. Buck-Morss S. The Cinema Screen as Prosthesis of Perception: A Historical Account. The Senses Still / ed. C. Nadia Seremetakis. Boulder/San Francisco/Oxford: Westview Press, 1994.

7. Buck-Morss S. The Dialectics of Seeing: Walter Benjamin and the Arcades Project. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1989.

8. Buck-Morss S. Translations in Time. October. N 172 (Spring 2020). P. 147–158.

9. Buck-Morss S. Visual Studies and Global Imagination. The Politics of Imagination: eds. Chiara Bottici and Benoît Challand. Abbingdon/New York: Birkbeck Law Press, 2011. Р. 214–233.

10. Buck-Morss S. YEAR 1: A Philosophical Recounting. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press, 2021.

11. Dean J. Crowds and Publics. Stasis. 2017. Vol. 5, N 1. P. 196–218.

12. DeBlasio A. The Filmmaker’s Philosopher: Merab Mamardaschvili and Russian Cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019.

13. Lifschitz M. The Crisis of Ugliness: From Cubism to Pop-Art: trans. and ed. David Riff. Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2019.

14. Petrovsky H. Art as an Instrument of Philosophy. The Palgrave Handbook of Russian Thought. Bykova M.F., Forster M.N., Steiner L. (eds). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham., p. 763.

15. Podoroga V. ’Revolutionary Machines’ and the Literature of Andrei Platonov. Stasis. 2017. Vol. 5, N 1. P. 36–57.

16. Podoroga V. A. Anthropograms: A Self-Critical Approach. Russian Studies in Phiosophy. 2016. Vol. 54. N 4. P. 267–358.

17. Podoroga V. Mimesis ms., English trans.

18. Podoroga V. Vtoroj Jekran. Sergej Jejzenshtejn I Kinematograf Nasiliya. T. 2. Prototelo. Fragmenty Vizualnoj Antropologii [Second Screen. Sergei Eisenstein And Cinema Violence. Vol. 2. Prototelo. Fragments of Visual Anthropology]. M: Breus, 2020.

19. Podoroga V., Chukhrov K., Penzin A. Marx against Marxism, Marxism against Marx. Stasis. Vol. 5. N 2 (2017). P. 266–288.

20. Seifrid Th. A Companion to Andrei Platonov’s “The Foundation Pit”. Academic Studies Press, 2009. Open Access: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1zxsjhv.

21. Žižek S. End of Capitalism, End of Humanity? Stasis. Spring 2017. Vol. 5, N 1. P. 16–19.