Oddities and Origins of Human Sexuality

Occupation: Chief Researcher in the Institute for Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences; Head of Department for Social Philosophy and Political Sciences of Novosibirsk State University; Professor of Department for International Affairs an
Affiliation:
Institute for Philosophy and Law, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
Novosibirsk State University
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Address: Novosibirsk, 630090, Novosibirsk, ul. Nikolayeva, 8, RUSSIA

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 32 Issue №2

Pages

125-146

Abstract

The paper is devoted to discussion of the key problems of the nature and genesis of human sexuality. The classical concept (D. Symons, H. Fisher, D. Bass, etc.) includes statements about different sexual strategies of men and women, the primacy and naturalness of monogamy, the lack of interest of women in sex, the evolutionary “side effects” of female orgasm. The main counterarguments are related to the ineradicability of adultery, not only from the male, but also from the female side, a variety of sexual relations in pre-state societies with the widespread distribution of ideas of “partial paternity” among them, special mechanisms of competition and selectivity in anatomy and physiology of male and female reproductive organs. Particular attention is paid to modern versions of the adaptive value and functions of the female orgasm. It is shown that neither “egoistic” explanations (keeping a partner and “hunting” for good genes), nor aesthetic (the intrinsic value of pleasure) can be considered sufficient. An evolutionary hypothesis explains the genesis of emotional-sexual syncretism in women and the “split” (dualism) of male sexuality. Feminine feelings for men have origin from the love and commitment of girls to fathers and older men as protectors. These emotions remain intact. Women usually retain close relationships and at least partial identification with their mothers. Among boys the initial love for their mothers inevitably suffers a crisis both in phylogeny through sexual selection and in ontogeny through negative reinforcements. In result, the direct transfer of this feeling to potential female partners becomes impossible but it can sublimate as a platonic love for ideal or inaccessible women. At the same time “sinister” sexual need develops separately and cannot always be combined with “high feelings”. This male split is compensated (at least partially) due to especially close relationships with a woman who reward herself and her partner with violent outpourings of sexual pleasure.

Keywords

sexuality, sexual strategies, evolution of sexuality, paleopsychology, female orgasm, "sperm war", primate sexuality, sex differences, human reproductive system, psychology of love

Publication date

30.04.2021

Number of characters

29298

Cite

GOST	Rozov N. Oddities and Origins of Human Sexuality // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №2 C. 125-146 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070014865-8-1 (circulation date: 19.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014865-8
MLA	Rozov, Nikolai S "Oddities and Origins of Human Sexuality." Chelovek 32.2 (2021):125-146. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014865-8
APA	Rozov N. (2021). Oddities and Origins of Human Sexuality. Chelovek 32(2), pp.125-146 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014865-8

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 734

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Aristotle. Nikomahova etika [Etica Nicomahica], transl. from Аncient Greek by I.V. Braginskaya. Aristotle. Sochineniya: v 4 t. [Collected Works: in 4 vol.]. Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1983. P. 53–293.

2. Bentham J. Vvedenie v osnovaniya nravstvennosti i zakonodatel'stva: per. s angl. [An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation: transl. from Engl.]. Moscow: ROSSPEN Publ., 1998.

3. Galichin V.A. Mezhdunarodnyj rynok obrazovatel'nyh uslug: Оsnovnye harakteristiki i tendencii razvitiya [International Market of Educational Services: Main Characteristics and Development Trends]. Moscow: Delo Publ., 2015. (Scientific Reports: Education / The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. 15/4).

4. Kant I. Osnovy metafiziki nravstvennosti [Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals]. Kant I. Sochineniya: v 6 t. [Collected Works: in 6 vol.] Vol. 4, Pt 1. Moscow: Mysl' Publ., 1965.

5. Konstitutsiya Rossiiskoi Federacii. Рprinyata vsenarodnym golosovaniem 12 dekabrya 1993 goda c izmeneniyami, odobrennymi v hode obshcherossiiskogo golosovaniya 1 iyulya 2020 goda. [The Constitution of the Russian Federation. Was Adopted by National Voting on 12 December 1993 with Amendments Approved During a National Voting on 1 July 2020]. URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202007040001 (date of access: 07.02.2020).

6. Coombs Ph.H. Krizis obrazovaniya v sovremennom mire [The World Educational Crisis: A Systems Analysis], transl. from Engl. by S.L. Volodina et al.; ed. by G.E. Skorov. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1970.

7. Musgrave R.A., Musgrave P.B. Gosudarstvennye finansy: teoriya i praktika: per. s angl. [Public Finance in Theory and Practice: transl. from Engl.]. Moscow: Byudzhet Publ., 2009.

8. Medvedev S.A., Tomashov I.A. Koncepciya global'nyh obshchestvennyh blag [Concept of Global Public Goods]. Vestnik mezhdunarodnyh organizacii: Obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika [International Organisations Research Journal]. 2009. Vol. 4, N 2. P. 21–28.

9. Pigou A.C. Ekonomicheskaya teoriya blagosostoyaniya: per. s angl. [The Economics of Welfare: transl. from Engl.]. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1985.

10. Rubinstein A. Meritorika i ekonomicheskaya sotsiodinamika: diskussiya s R. Masgreivom [Meritorics and Economic Sociodynamics: Debates with R. Musgrave]. Voprosy ekonomiki. 2009. N 11. P. 98–109. URL: https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2009-11-98-109 (date of access: 07.02.2021).

11. Samuelson P. Chistaya teoriya obshchestvennyh raskhodov [The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure], transl. from Engl. by I.A. Rozmainskii. Vekhi ekonomicheskoi mysli. Tom 4. Ekonomika blagosostoyaniya i obshchestvennyi vybor [Milestones in Economic Thought. Vol. 4. Welfare Economics and Public Choice]. St. Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya shkola Publ., 2004. P. 371–376.

12. Smirnova E.Yu. Obrazovanie kak ekonomicheskoe blago. Vvedenie v ekonomiku obrazovaniya [Education as an Economic Good. Introduction to Economics of Education]. Vesnіk adukacyі. Minsk, 2015. N 11. P. 19–22.

13. Smith A. Issledovanie o prirode i o printsipakh bogatstva narodov: per. s angl. [An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations: transl. from Engl.]. Moscow: Sotsekgiz Publ., 1962.

14. Social'naya politika, napravlennaya na sodeistvie bolee vseohvatnomu, stabil'nomu i ustoichivomu vosstanovleniyu: vosstanovlenie posle COVID-19 po principu “luchshe, chem bylo” dlya dostizheniya celei Povestki dnya na period do 2030 goda v kontekste desyatiletiya deistvii i svershenii vo imya ustoichivogo razvitiya. Zapiska Sekretariata. OON [Social Policy to Promote a More Inclusive, Resilient and Sustainable Recovery: Building Back Better Post-COVID-19 for the Achievement of the 2030 Agenda in the Context of the Decade of Action and Delivery for Sustainable Development. Note by the Secretariat. UN]. E/CN.5/2021/4 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://undocs.org/ru/E/CN.5/2021/4 (date of access: 07.02.2021).

15. Stiglitz J.E. Ekonomika gosudarstvennogo sektora [Economics of the Public Sector], transl. from Engl. by E.E. Kumanina, G.M. Kumanin. Moscow: Moscow State Univ.: Infra-M Publ, 1997.

16. Styuart T.A. Intellektual'nyj kapital: Novyi istochnik bogatstva organizacii [Intellectual Capital: The New Wealth of Organizations]. Moscow: Pokolenie Publ, 2007. P. 388–392.

17. Tugusheva R.R. Obrazovanie kak intellektual'noe blago [Educational Benefit as an Intelligent Good]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo [Izvestiya Of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Economics. Management. Law]. 2017. Vol. 2. P. 157–163.

18. Chernyh S.I. Obrazovanie kak obshchestvennoe i individual'noe blago [Education as Social and Individual Benefit]. Professional'noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire [Professional Education in the Modern World]. 2015. Vol. 1(16). P. 17–26.

19. Case K.E. Musgrave's Vision of the Public Sector: The Complex Relationship Between Individual, Society and State in Public Good Theory. Journal of Economics and Finance. 2008. Vol. 32(4). P. 348–355. DOI: 10.1007/s12197-008-9055-1.8

20. Moşteanu T., Creţan G.C. Education and the Characteristics of Public Goods. Overlaps and Differences. Theoretical and Applied Economics. 2011. Vol. 18, N 9(562). P. 33–40.

21. Stiglitz J. Knowledge as а Global Public Good. Kaul I., Grunberg I., Stern M. Global Public Goods. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1999. URL: http://pinguet.free.fr/stiglitz1999.pdf.18 (date of access: 07.02.2021).