The Problem of Proportionality Between Human and City in the Context of the Architecture of Soviet Modernism

Occupation: Research Fellow of the Department of Philosophy of Russian History
Affiliation: RAS Institute of Philosophy
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow

Journal name

Chelovek

Edition

Volume 32 Issue №1

Pages

25-41

Abstract

The article analyzes the nature of the relationship between human — a resident of a post-soviet city — with the surrounding urban environment, a significant part of which is formed by buildings and objects built in the period 1960–1970s in the style of the so-called soviet (or socialist) modernism. It is suggested that such architecture, which is characterized by its large scale and apparent heaviness, is still fully proportionate to a person, corresponding to the aesthetic and socio-political aspects of his everyday life, and such meanings were originally laid in it as a theoretical, philosophical foundation that does not contradict the technical and aesthetic aspects of this type of urban environment. The article also addresses the question of the relationship between space, specifically organized within the “socialist city of the future”, and the time, that a human can have in such an environment. The issue of the relationship between work, creativity and free time is considered in the context of criticism of К. Marx’s theory in H. Arendt’s work “Vita activa” and the comments, given by the philosopher and theorist of culture V. Mezhuev. In addition, the article notes that the characterization of the architecture of soviet modernism, following the architecture of the avant-garde as a kind of “utopia” is not entirely correct: as an example, the article examines a number of theoretical provisions of the project of urban organisation, named “new element of resettlement” (NER, 1960s), which, at first glance paradoxically, but in reality, quite logically combined the principles of rational planning and creative search, of individual freedom and the common good.

Keywords

philosophy of the city, human and environment, philosophical and political anthropology, modernism, philosophy of architecture, philosophical urban studies, new element of resettlement, “thaw”

Publication date

19.03.2021

Number of characters

27482

Cite

GOST	Sharova V. The Problem of Proportionality Between Human and City in the Context of the Architecture of Soviet Modernism // Chelovek – 2021. – V. 32. – Issue №1 C. 25-41 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070014181-6-1 (circulation date: 26.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014181-6
MLA	Sharova, Veronika "The Problem of Proportionality Between Human and City in the Context of the Architecture of Soviet Modernism." Chelovek 32.1 (2021):25-41. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014181-6
APA	Sharova V. (2021). The Problem of Proportionality Between Human and City in the Context of the Architecture of Soviet Modernism. Chelovek 32(1), pp.25-41 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070014181-6

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 653

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arendt H. Vita activa, ili o deyatel'noi zhizni [The Human Condition], transl. from Germ. and Engl. by V.V. Bibikhin. St. Petersburg: Aleteiya Publ., 2000.

2. Aristotle. Politika [Politics], transl. from Аncient Greek by S.A. Zhebelev, M.L. Gasparov. Moscow: AST: Astrel Publ., 2012.

3. Baburov A., Gutnov A., Dyumenton G. et al. Novyi element rasseleniya: Na puti k novomu gorodu [A New Element of Resettlement: On the Way to a New City]. Moscow: Stroiizdat Publ., 1966.

4. Berdyaev N.A. Tsarstvo dukha i tsarstvo kesarya [The Kingdom of the Spirit and the Kingdom of Caesar]. Paris: YMCA-Press Publ., 1951.

5. Ginzburg M.Ya. Novye metody arkhitekturnogo myshleniya [New Methods of Architectural Thinking]. Sovremennaya arkhitektura. 1926. N 1. P. 1–4.

6. Gutnov A.E, Lezhava I.G. Budushchee goroda [The Future of the City]. Moscow: Stroiizdat Publ., 1977.

7. Gutnov A.E, Lezhava I.G. Nekotorye predposylki formirovaniya perspektivnoi sistemy rasseleniya [Some Prerequisites for the Formation of a Promising Settlement System]. Gorod i vremya [The City and Time], Research Institute of Theory, History and Prospective Problems of Soviet Architecture (Moscow); Institute for Basic Problems of Spatial Planning (Warsaw). Moscow: Stroiizdat Publ., 1973.

8. Doch' Alekseya Gutnova — ob ottse-ideologe utopicheskogo goroda i poslevoennom pokolenii arkhitektorov [Daughter of Alexei Gutnov — About the Father, Ideologist of the Utopian City and the Post-war Generation of Architects] [Electronic resource]. URL: https://strelkamag.com/ru/article/gutnov (date of access: 01.08.2020).

9. Zhuravlev A.M., Ikonnikov A.V., Rochegov A.G. Arkhitektura Sovetskoi Rossii [Architecture of the Soviet Russia]. Moscow: Stroiizdat Publ., 1987.

10. Ikonnikov A.V. Utopicheskoe myshlenie i arkhitektura [Utopian Thinking and Architecture]. Moscow: Arkhitektura-S Publ., 2004.

11. Le Corbusier. Luchezarnyi gorod [Radiant City]. Le Corbusier. Arkhitektura XX veka [Architecture of the XXth Century], transl. from French by V.V. Fryazinov; ed. by K.T. Topuridze. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1970.

12. Le Corbusier. Novyi dukh v arkhitekture [A New Spirit in Architecture]. Le Corbusier. Arkhitektura XX veka [Architecture of the XXth Century], transl. from French by V.V. Fryazinov; ed. by K.T. Topuridze. Moscow: Progress Publ., 1970.

13. Lynch K. Obraz goroda [The Image of the City], transl. from Engl. by V.L. Glazychev; ed. by A.V. Ikonnikov. Moscow: Stroiizdat Publ., 1982.

14. Mezhuev V.M. Ideya vsemirnoi istorii v uchenii Karla Marksa [The Idea of World History in the Teachings of Karl Marx]. Logos. 2001. N 2(81). P. 3–36.

15. Park R. Gorod kak sotsial'naya laboratoriya [The City as a Social Laboratory]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie. 2002. Vol. 2, N 3. P. 3–12.

16. Pervushina E.V. Leningradskaya utopiya: Avangard v arkhitekture Severnoi stolitsy [Leningrad Utopia: Avant-garde in the Architecture of the Northern Capital]. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf Publ., 2012.

17. Tarabarina Y. Chto takoe byl NER? [What was NER?] [Electronic resource]. URL: https://archi.ru/russia/82147/chto-takoe-byl-ner (date of access: 22.07.2020).

18. Engels F. K zhilishchnomu voprosu [On the Housing Issue]. Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya: v 30 t. [Works: in 30 vol.]. 2nd ed. Vol. 18. Moscow: Gospolitizdat Publ., 1961.

19. Fisher S. Philosophy of Architecture. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition), ed. by E.N. Zalta [Electronic resource]. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/architecture/ (date of access: 24.07.2020).