Self-forgiveness As an Imaginary Idea

The paper analyses the phenomenon of self-forgiveness as it is comprehended in current ethics from the point of view of mutually defining tasks, which morality sets before a person, namely, orients him: first, on achievement and maintenance of consent, reconciliation, solidarity in relations between people; second, on aspiration for personal perfection. Two basic meanings of the idea of self-forgiveness are emphasized in different concepts. First, self-forgiveness is understood as self-recovery (self-rehabilitation) after a moral failings — harm to other person and thus to oneself in the form of loss of self-respect, dignity, etc. Second, self-forgiveness is understood as a necessary condition of interpersonal forgiveness. In this sense, it presupposes recognition as his own the act that caused harm to another person and taking responsibility for it, as well as repentance, self-examination aimed at revealing the features of character that led to the wrong act, efforts to correct them and improve oneself, care for the victim of the wrong act, compensation for the harm caused, etc. In other words, it turns out that behind the discussion of the idea of self-forgiveness hides the other phenomena (both moral and non-moral): self-improvement, self-acceptance, repentance, caring for the other, asking for forgiveness, etc., which only confuses ethical reasoning. Consideration of the idea of self-forgiveness in the perspective to the concept of morality has shown that if self-forgiveness is interpreted as justified and deserved liberation of oneself from the feeling of guilt for the consequences of one's transgressions, then it loses its moral importance and distorts the nature of forgiveness, as it orients the person to himself and not to another/other and cannot solve those specific tasks that are solved by forgiveness, namely restoration of consent and reconciliation in relations between people.

Keywords

morality, forgiveness, resentment, self-forgiveness, repentance, self-improvement

Received

29.09.2020

Publication date

29.09.2020

Number of characters

38415

Cite

GOST	Artemyeva O. Self-forgiveness As an Imaginary Idea // Chelovek – 2020. – V. 31. – Issue №4 C. 128-146 [Electronic resource]. URL: https://chelovek-journal.ru/S023620070010934-4-1 (circulation date: 19.04.2024). DOI: 10.31857/S023620070010934-4
MLA	Artemyeva, Olga "Self-forgiveness As an Imaginary Idea." Chelovek 31.4 (2020):128-146. DOI: 10.31857/S023620070010934-4
APA	Artemyeva O. (2020). Self-forgiveness As an Imaginary Idea. Chelovek 31(4), pp.128-146 DOI: 10.31857/S023620070010934-4

100 rub.

When subscribing to an article or issue, the user can download PDF, evaluate the publication or contact the author. Need to register.

Number of purchasers: 0, views: 781

Readers community rating: votes 0

1. Arendt H. Nekotorye voprosy moral'noi filosofii [Some Questions of Moral Philosophy], transl. from Engl. by A.D. Aronson. Arendt H. Otvetstvennost' i suzhdenie [Responsibility and Judgement]. Moscow: The Gaidar Institute Publ., 2013.

2. Arendt H. Vita activa, ili o deyatel'noi zhizni [Vita Activa and the Human Condition], transl. from Germ. and Engl. by V.V. Bibikhin. St. Petersburg: Aleteia Publ., 2000.

3. Slovar' russkogo yazyka: v 4 t. [Russian Dictionary: in 4 vol.], ed. by A.P. Evgen'eva. 4th ed. Vol. 1. Moscow: Russkii yazyk: Poligrafresursy Publ., 1999.

4. Troitskiy K.E. Proshchenie: ot dvukh ehticheskikh kontseptsii k dvum moral'nym perspektivam [Forgiveness and Morality: From Two Ethical Approaches to Two Moral Perspectives]. Voprosy Filosofii. 2020. N 2. P. 86–97.

5. Bauer L., Duffy J., Fountain E. et al. Exploring Self-Forgiveness. Journal of Religion and Health. 1992. Vol. 31, N 2. P. 149–160.

6. Butler J. Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel. Butler J. The Works of Bishop Butler, ed. by D.E. White. Rochester: Univ. of Rochester Press, 2006. P. 33–146.

7. Dillon R.S. Self-Forgiveness and Self-Respect. Ethics. 2001. Vol. 112, N 1. P. 53–83.

8. Downie R.S. Forgiveness. The Philosophical Quarterly. 1965. Vol. 15, N 59. P. 128–134.

9. Gamlund E. Ethical Aspects of Self-forgiveness. SATS. 2014. Vol. 15, N 2. P. 237–256.

10. Griswold Ch. Forgiveness: A Philosophical Exploration. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007.

11. Holmgren M. Forgiveness and Retribution, Responding to Wrongdoing. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012.

12. Hughes M. Forgiveness. Analysis. 1975. Vol. 4, N 35. P. 113–117.

13. Hughes P.M., Warmke B. Forgiveness. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), ed. by E.N. Zalta. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/forgiveness/ (date of access: 25.04.2020).

14. Konstan D. Before Forgiveness: The Origins of a Moral Idea. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010.

15. Moore K.D. Justice, Mercy and the Public Interest. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 1989.

16. Murphy J.G. Getting Even: Forgiveness and Its Limits. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2003.

17. Murphy J.G., Hampton J. Forgiveness and Mercy. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988.

18. Newberry P.A. Joseph Butler on Forgiveness: A Presupposed Theory of Emotion. Journal of the History of Ideas. 2001. Vol. 62, N 2. P. 233–244.

19. Nussbaum M. Anger and Forgiveness. New York: Oxford Univ. Press, 2016.

20. Snow N. Self-forgiveness. The Journal of Value Inquiry. 1993. Vol. 27, N. 1. P. 75–80.

21. Strawson P.F. Resentment and Freedom. London; New York: Routledge, 2008.

22. Vitz P., Mead J.M. Self-forgiveness in Psychology and Psychotherapy: A Critique. Journal of Religion and Health. 2011. Vol. 50, N 2. Р. 248–263.

23. Weitzel S. On the Relationship between Forgiveness and Resentment in the Sermons of Joseph Butler. History of Philosophy Quarterly. 2007. Vol. 24, N 3. P. 237–253.

24. Williston B. The Importance of Self-forgiveness. American Philosophical Quarterley. 2012. Vol. 49, N 1. P. 67–80.